Department of Life Sciences, State University of Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
University Center Unidompedro, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0309083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309083. eCollection 2024.
Although the ankle-brachial index (ABI) presents overall satisfactory accuracy, its sensitivity in the context of screening strategies does not ensure the detection of all individuals with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), especially in clinical situations where there is calcification of the arterial media layer. This study evaluated the accuracy of ABI in screening PAD among individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) in a community setting. An observational study included only individuals with DM. ABI measurement was performed, and the lower limb duplex ultrasound (DU) was used as the reference standard for PAD diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-) of ABI were assessed. The analysis included 194 limbs from 99 participants, with a PAD prevalence identified by DU of 15.98%. ABI demonstrated an accuracy of 87.63%, with a sensitivity of 35.48%, specificity of 97.55%, PPV of 73.33%, NPV of 89.83%, LR+ of 14.46, and LR- of 0.66. ABI showed high specificity but limited sensitivity in detecting PAD among individuals with DM in a community setting. An LR- of 0.66 suggests that a normal ABI result reduces but does not eliminate the possibility of PAD, highlighting the importance of complementary diagnostic approaches to enhance accuracy in identifying PAD in high-risk patients, such as those with DM. Incorporating additional diagnostic methods may be necessary to improve the effectiveness of PAD screening in this group.
尽管踝臂指数 (ABI) 的整体准确性令人满意,但在筛查策略的背景下,其敏感性并不能确保检测出所有患有外周动脉疾病 (PAD) 的个体,尤其是在动脉中层钙化的临床情况下。本研究评估了 ABI 在社区环境中筛查糖尿病患者 (DM) 中 PAD 的准确性。一项观察性研究仅纳入 DM 患者。进行 ABI 测量,并将下肢双功能超声 (DU) 作为 PAD 诊断的参考标准。评估了 ABI 的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值 (PPV 和 NPV) 以及阳性和阴性似然比 (LR+ 和 LR-)。该分析包括 99 名参与者的 194 条肢体,通过 DU 确定的 PAD 患病率为 15.98%。ABI 表现出 87.63%的准确性,敏感性为 35.48%,特异性为 97.55%,PPV 为 73.33%,NPV 为 89.83%,LR+ 为 14.46,LR-为 0.66。ABI 显示出在社区环境中检测 DM 患者 PAD 时具有高特异性但敏感性有限。LR-为 0.66 表明正常的 ABI 结果降低但不能排除 PAD 的可能性,这凸显了采用补充诊断方法来提高识别高危患者(如 DM 患者)PAD 的准确性的重要性。对于该组患者,可能需要纳入额外的诊断方法以提高 PAD 筛查的有效性。