School of Health Sciences, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, The University of Newcastle, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Diabet Med. 2021 Feb;38(2):e14379. doi: 10.1111/dme.14379. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
To systematically evaluate research investigating the accuracy of the ankle-brachial index (ABI) for diagnosing peripheral artery disease (PAD) in people with diabetes, as the accuracy is thought to be reduced in this cohort.
A database search of EBSCO Megafile Premier, Embase and The Cochrane Library was conducted to 28 February 2019. Prospective and retrospective investigations of the diagnostic accuracy of the ABI for PAD in people with diabetes using an imaging reference standard were eligible. Sensitivity and specify of the ABI and bivariate meta-analysis against reference tests, or a standard summary receiver operating curve analysis (SROC) was performed.
Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. ABI was compared with angiography in 12 studies and with colour duplex ultrasound (CDUS) in 21 studies. A SROC analysis of studies using angiography as the reference standard found a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 9.06 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.61 to 22.69], and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.76 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.86). Bivariate analysis of studies using CDUS demonstrated mean sensitivity of 0.60 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.71; P = 0.097) and mean specificity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.92; P < 0.001) with a DOR of 9.76 (95% CI 5.24 to 18.20; P < 0.0001) and AUC 0.72.
These results suggest the ABI has a high specificity but lower sensitivity in detecting imaging diagnosed PAD in people with diabetes. The low probability of the testing being able to rule diagnosis in or out suggest that the ABI has limited effectiveness for early detection of PAD in this cohort.
系统评价研究踝臂指数(ABI)诊断糖尿病患者外周动脉疾病(PAD)准确性的研究,因为该指数在该患者群体中的准确性被认为有所降低。
对 EBSCO Megafile Premier、Embase 和 The Cochrane Library 进行数据库检索,检索时间截至 2019 年 2 月 28 日。纳入前瞻性和回顾性研究,这些研究使用影像学参考标准评估 ABI 诊断糖尿病患者 PAD 的准确性。对 ABI 与参考检验的敏感性和特异性进行双变量 meta 分析,或进行标准汇总受试者工作特征曲线分析(SROC)。
33 项研究符合纳入标准。ABI 与血管造影比较的研究有 12 项,与彩色双功能超声(CDUS)比较的研究有 21 项。使用血管造影作为参考标准的研究的 SROC 分析发现,诊断比值比(DOR)为 9.06(95%置信区间(CI)为 3.61 至 22.69),曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.76(95%CI 为 0.66 至 0.86)。使用 CDUS 的研究的双变量分析显示,平均敏感性为 0.60(95%CI 为 0.48 至 0.71;P=0.097),平均特异性为 0.87(95%CI 为 0.78 至 0.92;P<0.001),DOR 为 9.76(95%CI 为 5.24 至 18.20;P<0.0001),AUC 为 0.72。
这些结果表明,ABI 在诊断糖尿病患者影像学诊断的 PAD 方面具有较高的特异性,但敏感性较低。由于该检测能够排除或确诊诊断的可能性较低,因此该指数对该患者群体中 PAD 的早期检测效果有限。