• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估踝臂血压指数诊断糖尿病患者外周动脉疾病的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Estimating the diagnostic accuracy of the ankle-brachial pressure index for detecting peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, Townsville, QLD, Australia.

Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, The University of Newcastle, Townsville, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2021 Feb;38(2):e14379. doi: 10.1111/dme.14379. Epub 2020 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1111/dme.14379
PMID:32740980
Abstract

AIM

To systematically evaluate research investigating the accuracy of the ankle-brachial index (ABI) for diagnosing peripheral artery disease (PAD) in people with diabetes, as the accuracy is thought to be reduced in this cohort.

METHODS

A database search of EBSCO Megafile Premier, Embase and The Cochrane Library was conducted to 28 February 2019. Prospective and retrospective investigations of the diagnostic accuracy of the ABI for PAD in people with diabetes using an imaging reference standard were eligible. Sensitivity and specify of the ABI and bivariate meta-analysis against reference tests, or a standard summary receiver operating curve analysis (SROC) was performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. ABI was compared with angiography in 12 studies and with colour duplex ultrasound (CDUS) in 21 studies. A SROC analysis of studies using angiography as the reference standard found a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 9.06 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.61 to 22.69], and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.76 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.86). Bivariate analysis of studies using CDUS demonstrated mean sensitivity of 0.60 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.71; P = 0.097) and mean specificity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.92; P < 0.001) with a DOR of 9.76 (95% CI 5.24 to 18.20; P < 0.0001) and AUC 0.72.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest the ABI has a high specificity but lower sensitivity in detecting imaging diagnosed PAD in people with diabetes. The low probability of the testing being able to rule diagnosis in or out suggest that the ABI has limited effectiveness for early detection of PAD in this cohort.

摘要

目的

系统评价研究踝臂指数(ABI)诊断糖尿病患者外周动脉疾病(PAD)准确性的研究,因为该指数在该患者群体中的准确性被认为有所降低。

方法

对 EBSCO Megafile Premier、Embase 和 The Cochrane Library 进行数据库检索,检索时间截至 2019 年 2 月 28 日。纳入前瞻性和回顾性研究,这些研究使用影像学参考标准评估 ABI 诊断糖尿病患者 PAD 的准确性。对 ABI 与参考检验的敏感性和特异性进行双变量 meta 分析,或进行标准汇总受试者工作特征曲线分析(SROC)。

结果

33 项研究符合纳入标准。ABI 与血管造影比较的研究有 12 项,与彩色双功能超声(CDUS)比较的研究有 21 项。使用血管造影作为参考标准的研究的 SROC 分析发现,诊断比值比(DOR)为 9.06(95%置信区间(CI)为 3.61 至 22.69),曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.76(95%CI 为 0.66 至 0.86)。使用 CDUS 的研究的双变量分析显示,平均敏感性为 0.60(95%CI 为 0.48 至 0.71;P=0.097),平均特异性为 0.87(95%CI 为 0.78 至 0.92;P<0.001),DOR 为 9.76(95%CI 为 5.24 至 18.20;P<0.0001),AUC 为 0.72。

结论

这些结果表明,ABI 在诊断糖尿病患者影像学诊断的 PAD 方面具有较高的特异性,但敏感性较低。由于该检测能够排除或确诊诊断的可能性较低,因此该指数对该患者群体中 PAD 的早期检测效果有限。

相似文献

1
Estimating the diagnostic accuracy of the ankle-brachial pressure index for detecting peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.评估踝臂血压指数诊断糖尿病患者外周动脉疾病的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabet Med. 2021 Feb;38(2):e14379. doi: 10.1111/dme.14379. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
2
Ankle brachial index for the diagnosis of lower limb peripheral arterial disease.踝臂指数用于诊断下肢外周动脉疾病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 14;9(9):CD010680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010680.pub2.
3
Effectiveness of bedside investigations to diagnose peripheral artery disease among people with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review.床边检查诊断糖尿病患者外周动脉疾病的有效性:系统评价。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar;40(3):e3683. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3683. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of the postexercise ankle-brachial index for detecting peripheral artery disease in suspected claudicants with and without diabetes.运动后踝臂指数在疑似跛行伴或不伴糖尿病患者中检测外周动脉疾病的诊断准确性。
Vasc Med. 2018 Apr;23(2):116-125. doi: 10.1177/1358863X17751259. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
5
The accuracy of toe brachial index and ankle brachial index in the diagnosis of lower limb peripheral arterial disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.足趾肱动脉指数和踝肱动脉指数诊断下肢周围动脉疾病的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Atherosclerosis. 2020 Dec;315:81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.09.026. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
6
Diagnostic value of ankle-brachial index in peripheral arterial disease: a meta-analysis.踝臂指数在周围动脉疾病中的诊断价值:一项荟萃分析。
Can J Cardiol. 2013 Apr;29(4):492-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.06.014. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
7
The accuracy of an oscillometric ankle-brachial index in the diagnosis of lower limb peripheral arterial disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.振荡式踝臂指数在诊断下肢外周动脉疾病中的准确性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Pract. 2017 Sep;71(9). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12994. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
8
Validation study of automated oscillometric measurement of the ankle-brachial index for lower arterial occlusive disease by comparison with computed tomography angiography.通过与计算机断层血管造影术对比,对用于下肢动脉闭塞性疾病的踝臂指数自动示波测量法进行验证研究。
Hypertens Res. 2014 Jun;37(6):591-4. doi: 10.1038/hr.2014.34. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
9
Simultaneous inter-arm and inter-leg systolic blood pressure differences to diagnose peripheral artery disease: a diagnostic accuracy study.采用双臂和双腿收缩压同步差值诊断外周动脉疾病:一项诊断准确性研究。
Blood Press. 2018 Apr;27(2):112-119. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2017.1400903. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
10
A Toe Flexion NIRS assisted Test for Rapid Assessment of Foot Perfusion in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Feasibility, Validity, and Diagnostic Accuracy.一种用于快速评估外周动脉疾病足部灌注的足趾屈曲近红外光谱辅助测试:可行性、有效性和诊断准确性。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Aug;54(2):187-194. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in risk factor profiles for peripheral artery disease compared to coronary, cerebral and carotid artery.与冠状动脉、脑动脉和颈动脉相比,外周动脉疾病风险因素概况的差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 31;15(1):3864. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88516-0.
2
Accuracy of ankle-brachial index in screening for peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes.踝臂指数在筛查糖尿病患者外周动脉疾病中的准确性。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0309083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309083. eCollection 2024.
3
Screening for Subclinical Atherosclerosis and the Prediction of Cardiovascular Events in People with Type 1 Diabetes.
1型糖尿病患者亚临床动脉粥样硬化的筛查及心血管事件的预测
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 15;13(4):1097. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041097.
4
Incoherent optical fluctuation flowmetry for detecting limbs with hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with type 2 diabetes.用于检测2型糖尿病患者中存在血流动力学显著狭窄肢体的非相干光波动血流测量法。
Endocrine. 2023 Dec;82(3):550-559. doi: 10.1007/s12020-023-03506-4. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
5
Peripheral arterial disease progression and ankle brachial index: a cohort study with newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes.外周动脉疾病进展与踝臂指数:一项新诊断 2 型糖尿病患者的队列研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02722-6.
6
Stratification of Microvascular Disease Severity in the Foot Using Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging.利用空间频域成像对足部微血管疾病严重程度进行分层
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Jan;17(1):25-34. doi: 10.1177/19322968211024666. Epub 2021 Jul 5.