• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颅内压和脑组织氧分压连续监测指导下创伤性脑损伤治疗的评估:一项单中心初步研究。

Assessment of traumatic brain injury treatment guided by continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure and brain tissue oxygen partial pressure: A single-center pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2024 Dec;130:110884. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110884. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110884
PMID:39447393
Abstract

Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability. Monitoring intracranial pressure (ICP) is recommended, but the data on the outcomes are conflicting. Adding continuous brain tissue oxygen partial pressure (PbtO2) monitoring may have some benefit but the OXY-TC suggested it did not improve 6-month neurological outcomes. This single-center pilot randomized controlled study aimed to evaluate whether adding PbtO2 monitoring was feasible and could improve the prognosis of severe TBI. The participants were randomized into either an ICP alone or an ICP + PbtO2 group for 7 days, with treatment protocols based on existing guidelines. Clinical parameters were collected hourly. The primary outcome was the feasibility of using PbtO2 monitoring. The secondary outcomes were 6-month survival, analyzed by the log-rank test, the 3- and 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores, compared between groups by chi-squared test. Seventy patients were included (36 ICP, 34 ICP + PbtO2). The ICP + PbtO2 group had lower mean daily ICP (13.4 vs. 18.2 mmHg, P = 0.0024) and higher mean daily cerebral perfusion pressure (82.1 vs. 74.5 mmHg, P = 0.0055). The ICP + PbtO2 group had higher 6-month survival (79.4 % vs. 55.6 %, P = 0.0337) and more favorable outcomes at 3 months (67.6 % vs. 38.9 %, P = 0.0160) and 6 months (70.6 % vs. 41.7 %, P = 0.0149). Adding PbtO2 monitoring to ICP monitoring is feasible in patients with severe TBI and could maybe improve the intermediate-term outcomes. The results will serve to design larger trials.

摘要

严重创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 是死亡和残疾的主要原因。建议监测颅内压 (ICP),但数据结果存在矛盾。添加连续脑组织氧分压 (PbtO2) 监测可能会有一些益处,但 OXY-TC 研究表明,它并不能改善 6 个月的神经预后。这项单中心的先导性随机对照研究旨在评估添加 PbtO2 监测是否可行,并能改善严重 TBI 的预后。参与者被随机分为 ICP 组或 ICP+PbtO2 组,持续监测 7 天,治疗方案基于现有指南。每小时收集临床参数。主要结果是评估使用 PbtO2 监测的可行性。次要结果是 6 个月的存活率,采用对数秩检验进行分析,并通过卡方检验比较两组之间的 3 个月和 6 个月格拉斯哥结局量表 (GOS) 评分。共纳入 70 例患者(ICP 组 36 例,ICP+PbtO2 组 34 例)。ICP+PbtO2 组的平均每日 ICP 较低(13.4mmHg 比 18.2mmHg,P = 0.0024),平均每日脑灌注压较高(82.1mmHg 比 74.5mmHg,P = 0.0055)。ICP+PbtO2 组 6 个月的存活率更高(79.4%比 55.6%,P = 0.0337),3 个月(67.6%比 38.9%,P = 0.0160)和 6 个月(70.6%比 41.7%,P = 0.0149)的结局更好。在严重 TBI 患者中,将 PbtO2 监测添加到 ICP 监测中是可行的,并且可能改善中期预后。这些结果将有助于设计更大规模的试验。

相似文献

1
Assessment of traumatic brain injury treatment guided by continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure and brain tissue oxygen partial pressure: A single-center pilot study.颅内压和脑组织氧分压连续监测指导下创伤性脑损伤治疗的评估:一项单中心初步研究。
J Clin Neurosci. 2024 Dec;130:110884. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110884. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
2
[Application of continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure and brain oxygen partial pressure in the treatment of patients with severe craniocerebral injury].颅内压及脑氧分压连续监测在重型颅脑损伤患者治疗中的应用
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Apr;33(4):449-454. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201106-00700.
3
Prognostic value of changes in brain tissue oxygen pressure before and after decompressive craniectomy following severe traumatic brain injury.去骨瓣减压术后脑组织氧压变化对严重颅脑损伤患者预后的评估价值。
J Neurosurg. 2018 May;128(5):1538-1546. doi: 10.3171/2017.1.JNS161840. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
4
Brain tissue oxygen plus intracranial pressure monitoring versus isolated intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with traumatic brain injury: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.创伤性脑损伤患者脑组织氧合加颅内压监测与单纯颅内压监测的比较:随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 May 30;166(1):240. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06125-8.
5
The impact of brain tissue oxygenation monitoring on the Glasgow Outcome Scale/Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic review.脑氧监测对中重度颅脑损伤患者格拉斯哥预后评分/格拉斯哥预后评分扩展的影响:系统评价。
Nurs Crit Care. 2024 Nov;29(6):1460-1469. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12973. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
6
Invasive brain tissue oxygen and intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring versus ICP-only monitoring in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury.小儿重型创伤性脑损伤中侵入性脑组织氧与颅内压(ICP)监测对比单纯ICP监测
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2022 May 27;30(2):239-249. doi: 10.3171/2022.4.PEDS21568. Print 2022 Aug 1.
7
Brain tissue oxygen combined with intracranial pressure monitoring versus isolated intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with traumatic brain injury: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.脑氧合并颅内压监测与单纯颅内压监测在颅脑损伤患者中的比较:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurol Sci. 2024 Jul;45(7):3051-3059. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07392-0. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
8
Brain tissue oxygen partial pressure monitoring and prognosis of patients with traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis.脑氧分压监测与颅脑损伤患者预后的关系:一项荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 May 17;47(1):222. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02439-4.
9
Outcomes associated with brain tissue oxygen monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury undergoing intracranial pressure monitoring.在接受颅内压监测的严重创伤性脑损伤患者中,与脑组织氧监测相关的结果。
J Neurosurg. 2021 May 14;135(6):1799-1806. doi: 10.3171/2020.11.JNS203739. Print 2021 Dec 1.
10
Focal brain oxygen, blood flow, and intracranial pressure measurements in relation to optimal cerebral perfusion pressure.与最佳脑灌注压相关的局部脑氧、血流和颅内压测量。
J Neurosurg. 2023 Nov 17;140(5):1423-1433. doi: 10.3171/2023.8.JNS231519. Print 2024 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Traumatic brain injury: Bridging pathophysiological insights and precision treatment strategies.创伤性脑损伤:连接病理生理见解与精准治疗策略
Neural Regen Res. 2026 Mar 1;21(3):887-907. doi: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-01398. Epub 2025 Mar 25.