• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于分类 2 型双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症的大脑功能网络和结构。

Brain functional networks and structures that categorize type 2 bipolar disorder and major depression.

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Prog Brain Res. 2024;290:63-81. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.05.008. Epub 2024 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.05.008
PMID:39448114
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Distinguishing between type 2 bipolar disorder (BD II) and major depressive disorder (MDD) poses a significant clinical challenge due to their overlapping symptomatology. This study aimed to investigate neurobiological markers that differentiate BD II from MDD using multimodal neuroimaging techniques.

METHODS

Fifty-nine individuals with BD II, 114 with MDD, and 117 healthy controls participated in the study, undergoing structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Functional connectivity (FC) analysis used regions from Shen's whole-brain FC-based atlas. Feature selection was carried out using independent t-tests and ReliefF algorithms, followed by classification using Support Vector Machine and wide neural network.

RESULTS

Significant differences in brain structure and function were observed among patients with BD II, MDD, and healthy controls. Both structural and functional alterations were more pronounced in BD II compared to MDD, particularly in regions associated with sensory processing, motor function, and the cerebellum. Classification based on neurobiological markers achieved a mean testing accuracy of 88.24%, with the t-test selected features outperforming those selected by ReliefF. Dysconnectivity patterns correlated with symptom severity and functioning in BD II but not MDD.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that neurobiological markers derived from multimodal imaging techniques can effectively differentiate patients with BD II from those with MDD. The identified alterations in brain structure and function, particularly in sensory-motor processing networks, may serve as potential biomarkers for distinguishing between these mood disorders. However, the influence of psychotropic medications and daily functioning severity on these neurobiological markers warrants further investigation.

摘要

背景

由于 2 型双相情感障碍(BD II)和重度抑郁症(MDD)的症状重叠,因此区分这两种疾病具有重大的临床挑战。本研究旨在使用多模态神经影像学技术,探讨区分 BD II 和 MDD 的神经生物学标志物。

方法

本研究纳入了 59 名 BD II 患者、114 名 MDD 患者和 117 名健康对照者,他们接受了结构和功能磁共振成像检查。功能连接(FC)分析使用了 Shen 的全脑 FC 图谱中的区域。采用独立 t 检验和 ReliefF 算法进行特征选择,然后使用支持向量机和宽神经网络进行分类。

结果

BD II、MDD 患者和健康对照组之间的大脑结构和功能存在显著差异。与 MDD 相比,BD II 患者的大脑结构和功能改变更为明显,特别是在与感觉处理、运动功能和小脑相关的区域。基于神经生物学标志物的分类平均测试准确率为 88.24%,t 检验选择的特征优于 ReliefF 选择的特征。BD II 患者的连接异常模式与症状严重程度和功能相关,但在 MDD 患者中则无相关性。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,源自多模态影像学技术的神经生物学标志物可有效区分 BD II 患者和 MDD 患者。大脑结构和功能的改变,特别是在感觉运动处理网络中,可能成为区分这些心境障碍的潜在生物标志物。然而,精神药物和日常功能严重程度对这些神经生物学标志物的影响需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Brain functional networks and structures that categorize type 2 bipolar disorder and major depression.用于分类 2 型双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症的大脑功能网络和结构。
Prog Brain Res. 2024;290:63-81. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2024.05.008. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
2
Distinct connectivity patterns in bipolar and unipolar depression: a functional connectivity multivariate pattern analysis study.双相和单相抑郁的不同连接模式:一项功能连接的多变量模式分析研究。
BMC Neurosci. 2024 Sep 27;25(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12868-024-00895-8.
3
Transdiagnostic Dysfunctions in Brain Modules Across Patients with Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder: A Connectome-Based Study.精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症患者大脑模块中的跨诊断功能障碍:一项基于连接组的研究。
Schizophr Bull. 2020 Apr 10;46(3):699-712. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbz111.
4
Local functional connectivity alterations in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder.精神分裂症、双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症的局部功能连接改变。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Aug 15;236:266-273. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.069. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
5
Resting state functional network switching rate is differently altered in bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.双相障碍和重度抑郁症患者的静息态功能网络切换率存在差异。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Aug 15;41(12):3295-3304. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25017. Epub 2020 May 13.
6
Shared and Distinct Functional Architectures of Brain Networks Across Psychiatric Disorders.精神障碍的脑网络的共享和独特功能架构。
Schizophr Bull. 2019 Mar 7;45(2):450-463. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby046.
7
Anticipation-related brain connectivity in bipolar and unipolar depression: a graph theory approach.双相和单相抑郁症中与预期相关的脑连接性:一种图论方法。
Brain. 2016 Sep;139(Pt 9):2554-66. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww157. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
8
Abnormal intrinsic cerebro-cerebellar functional connectivity in un-medicated patients with bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症未服药患者的大脑固有脑-小脑功能连接异常。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Nov;235(11):3187-3200. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-5021-6. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
9
Transdiagnostic time-varying dysconnectivity across major psychiatric disorders.跨主要精神障碍的诊断时间变异性连接不良。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Mar;42(4):1182-1196. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25285. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
10
Dysfunctional connectivity between raphe nucleus and subcortical regions presented opposite differences in bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.中缝核与皮质下区域之间的功能连接在双相障碍和重性抑郁障碍中呈现出相反的差异。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 8;92:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.12.017. Epub 2018 Dec 31.