• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非语言疼痛评估工具中文版:关键的患者信度和效度

Chinese Version of the Nonverbal Pain Assessment Tool: Critical Patient Reliability and Validity.

作者信息

Jia Donghui, Wang Shengjun, Wang Qian, Wang Hengyang, Xie Haohao, Jiang Youfei, Zhang Zhigang, Lyu Xinghua

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Lanzhou University First Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.

School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2025 Jul;34(7):2908-2917. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17497. Epub 2024 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1111/jocn.17497
PMID:39449189
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To translate and validate the Nonverbal Pain Assessment Tool.

BACKGROUND

Timely assessment of the pain degree of nonverbal intensive care unit (ICU) patients can provide humanistic care. However, there is a lack of pain assessment tools that can meet the needs of patients who cannot use language in ICUs in China.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey.

METHODS

We conducted forward-backward translation of the Nonverbal Pain Assessment Tool. A total of 300 critically ill patients in the intensive care unit who could not communicate verbally completed the Chinese version of the Nonverbal Pain Assessment Tool and the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to verify structural validity, and content validity and reliability analyses were also conducted.

RESULTS

The Nonverbal Pain Assessment Tool demonstrated high internal consistency (α = 0.901) and interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.981), with good split-half reliability. Content validity was established through acceptable item-level content validity index and scale-level content validity index scores. Exploratory factor analysis showed a single factor explaining 71.79% of total variance, and confirmatory factor analysis confirmed good model fit. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was 0.917 between the Nonverbal Pain Assessment Tool and the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool. The Chinese Nonverbal Pain Assessment Tool demonstrated significant differences in scores between different states of consciousness and illness severity, supporting its known-groups validity.

CONCLUSION

The Chinese version of the Nonverbal Pain Assessment Tool is a reliable and valid tool for nonverbal pain assessment in ICU patients in China.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The Chinese version of the Nonverbal Pain Assessment Tool can assess the pain of patients who cannot use language in ICU, which provides a new valuable assessment tool for Chinese clinicians and nurses in pain assessment and management.

REPORTING METHOD

Our study followed the STROBE Checklists.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patients actively cooperated and participated in data collection during the implementation of the study.

摘要

目的与目标

翻译并验证非语言疼痛评估工具。

背景

及时评估非语言重症监护病房(ICU)患者的疼痛程度可提供人文关怀。然而,在中国,ICU中缺乏能够满足无法使用语言患者需求的疼痛评估工具。

设计

横断面调查。

方法

我们对非语言疼痛评估工具进行了前后向翻译。共有300名无法进行言语交流的重症监护病房危重症患者完成了中文版非语言疼痛评估工具和重症监护疼痛观察工具。进行探索性和验证性因素分析以验证结构效度,并进行内容效度和信度分析。

结果

非语言疼痛评估工具显示出高内部一致性(α = 0.901)和评分者间信度(组内相关系数 = 0.981),具有良好的分半信度。通过可接受的项目水平内容效度指数和量表水平内容效度指数得分建立了内容效度。探索性因素分析显示一个因素解释了总方差的71.79%,验证性因素分析证实模型拟合良好。非语言疼痛评估工具与重症监护疼痛观察工具之间的斯皮尔曼等级相关系数为0.917。中文版非语言疼痛评估工具在不同意识状态和疾病严重程度之间的得分存在显著差异,支持其已知组效度。

结论

中文版非语言疼痛评估工具是中国ICU患者非语言疼痛评估的可靠且有效的工具。

与临床实践的相关性

中文版非语言疼痛评估工具可评估ICU中无法使用语言患者的疼痛,为中国临床医生和护士进行疼痛评估和管理提供了一种新的有价值的评估工具。

报告方法

我们的研究遵循STROBE清单。

患者或公众贡献

患者在研究实施过程中积极配合并参与数据收集。

相似文献

1
Chinese Version of the Nonverbal Pain Assessment Tool: Critical Patient Reliability and Validity.非语言疼痛评估工具中文版:关键的患者信度和效度
J Clin Nurs. 2025 Jul;34(7):2908-2917. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17497. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
2
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa (P-CAN-C) scale: a validation study in patients with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症利弊中文版量表(P-CAN-C)的心理测量学特性:一项针对神经性厌食症患者的效度研究
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01314-x.
3
Psychometric validation and interpretation thresholds of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQOL©) questionnaire using pooled data from the phase III BE HEARD I & II trials of bimekizumab in hidradenitis suppurativa.使用比美吉珠单抗治疗化脓性汗腺炎的III期BE HEARD I和II试验的汇总数据,对化脓性汗腺炎生活质量(HiSQOL©)问卷进行心理测量学验证和解释阈值分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):93-104. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf067.
4
A systematic review of observational pain assessment instruments for use with nonverbal intubated critically ill adult patients in the emergency department: an assessment of their suitability and psychometric properties.急诊科非语言插管成年危重症患者疼痛评估工具的系统评价:评估其适用性和心理测量特性
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Jan;26(1-2):7-32. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13594.
5
Italian validation of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire in spinal pain: a useful tool for clinicians and physiotherapist (CEQ-I).意大利对脊柱疼痛可信度/预期问卷的验证:临床医生和物理治疗师的有用工具(CEQ-I)
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2025 Jun 21;16:20406223251324812. doi: 10.1177/20406223251324812. eCollection 2025.
6
Clinical tools for the assessment of pain in sedated critically ill adults.评估镇静的危重症成年患者疼痛的临床工具。
Nurs Crit Care. 2008 Nov-Dec;13(6):288-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2008.00294.x.
7
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
8
Measuring Managerial, Collegial, and Organizational Aspects Associated With Digital Health Competence in Healthcare Professionals: Validation of the Chinese Version of the DigiComInf Instrument.衡量医疗保健专业人员数字健康能力相关的管理、同事关系和组织方面:DigiComInf工具中文版的验证
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Jun 16;2025:8854459. doi: 10.1155/jonm/8854459. eCollection 2025.
9
A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements.系统评价教师代理报告儿童身体素养或构成要素的工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 8;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01162-3.
10
Validation of the Chinese Patient Participation Scale (PPS-C) in Internal Medicine Patient: A Psychometric Study.中文版患者参与量表(PPS-C)在内科患者中的效度验证:一项心理测量学研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Jun 10;19:1703-1715. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S518317. eCollection 2025.