Suppr超能文献

四种测量隐斜视及调节性集合与调节比率的方法比较

Comparison of Four Methods for Measuring Heterophoria and Accommodative Convergence over Accommodation Ratio.

作者信息

Nores-Palmas Noelia, Noya-Padin Veronica, Yebra-Pimentel Eva, Giraldez Maria Jesus, Pena-Verdeal Hugo

机构信息

Applied Physics Department (Optometry Area), Facultade de Óptica e Optometría, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15705 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Optometry Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

出版信息

Vision (Basel). 2024 Oct 18;8(4):62. doi: 10.3390/vision8040062.

Abstract

The study aimed to assess the agreement between OptoTab SERIES, alternating Cover Test, Modified Thorington test, and Von Graefe method in measuring heterophoria and accommodative convergence over accommodation (AC/A) ratio. In an initial step, heterophoria was assessed at both distance and near in a cohort of 76 healthy young volunteers using the previously described tests. Subsequently, to determine the AC/A ratio, near-vision measurements were repeated with +1.00 D and -1.00 D lenses. All tests were performed in a randomized order across participants under consistent conditions. Significant differences were found between the Modified Thorington test and all other tests at distance (Wilcoxon test, all ≤ 0.001) and between Von Graefe and all other tests at near (Wilcoxon test, all ≤ 0.005). Regarding the AC/A ratio, significant differences were observed between all methods in +1.00 D AC/A ratio, except for the Modified Thorington test vs. the alternating Cover Test (Wilcoxon test, = 0.024). In the -1.00 D AC/A ratio, differences were observed between OptoTab POCKET and all the other tests (Wilcoxon test, all ≤ 0.001). The results indicate that all methods are interchangeable except the Modified Thorington test at distance and Von Graefe at near. For the AC/A ratio, only the Modified Thorington test is interchangeable with the alternating Cover Test using +1.00 D lenses and all are interchangeable using -1.00 D lenses except OptoTab POCKET.

摘要

该研究旨在评估OptoTab系列、交替遮盖试验、改良Thorington试验和Von Graefe法在测量隐斜视和调节性集合与调节之比(AC/A比率)方面的一致性。在第一步中,使用上述试验在76名健康年轻志愿者队列中评估了远近距离的隐斜视。随后,为了确定AC/A比率,使用+1.00 D和-1.00 D镜片重复进行近视力测量。所有试验在一致条件下对参与者以随机顺序进行。在远距离时,改良Thorington试验与所有其他试验之间存在显著差异(Wilcoxon检验,所有P≤0.001);在近距离时,Von Graefe试验与所有其他试验之间存在显著差异(Wilcoxon检验,所有P≤0.005)。关于AC/A比率,在+1.00 D AC/A比率中,除改良Thorington试验与交替遮盖试验外(Wilcoxon检验,P = 0.024),所有方法之间均观察到显著差异。在-1.00 D AC/A比率中,OptoTab POCKET与所有其他试验之间存在差异(Wilcoxon检验,所有P≤0.001)。结果表明,除远距离的改良Thorington试验和近距离的Von Graefe试验外,所有方法均可互换。对于AC/A比率,仅改良Thorington试验在使用+1.00 D镜片时可与交替遮盖试验互换,在使用-1.00 D镜片时,除OptoTab POCKET外所有方法均可互换。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fef/11503332/c8689ca23460/vision-08-00062-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验