Nores-Palmas Noelia, Noya-Padin Veronica, Yebra-Pimentel Eva, Giraldez Maria Jesus, Pena-Verdeal Hugo
Applied Physics Department (Optometry Area), Facultade de Óptica e Optometría, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15705 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Optometry Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Vision (Basel). 2024 Oct 18;8(4):62. doi: 10.3390/vision8040062.
The study aimed to assess the agreement between OptoTab SERIES, alternating Cover Test, Modified Thorington test, and Von Graefe method in measuring heterophoria and accommodative convergence over accommodation (AC/A) ratio. In an initial step, heterophoria was assessed at both distance and near in a cohort of 76 healthy young volunteers using the previously described tests. Subsequently, to determine the AC/A ratio, near-vision measurements were repeated with +1.00 D and -1.00 D lenses. All tests were performed in a randomized order across participants under consistent conditions. Significant differences were found between the Modified Thorington test and all other tests at distance (Wilcoxon test, all ≤ 0.001) and between Von Graefe and all other tests at near (Wilcoxon test, all ≤ 0.005). Regarding the AC/A ratio, significant differences were observed between all methods in +1.00 D AC/A ratio, except for the Modified Thorington test vs. the alternating Cover Test (Wilcoxon test, = 0.024). In the -1.00 D AC/A ratio, differences were observed between OptoTab POCKET and all the other tests (Wilcoxon test, all ≤ 0.001). The results indicate that all methods are interchangeable except the Modified Thorington test at distance and Von Graefe at near. For the AC/A ratio, only the Modified Thorington test is interchangeable with the alternating Cover Test using +1.00 D lenses and all are interchangeable using -1.00 D lenses except OptoTab POCKET.
该研究旨在评估OptoTab系列、交替遮盖试验、改良Thorington试验和Von Graefe法在测量隐斜视和调节性集合与调节之比(AC/A比率)方面的一致性。在第一步中,使用上述试验在76名健康年轻志愿者队列中评估了远近距离的隐斜视。随后,为了确定AC/A比率,使用+1.00 D和-1.00 D镜片重复进行近视力测量。所有试验在一致条件下对参与者以随机顺序进行。在远距离时,改良Thorington试验与所有其他试验之间存在显著差异(Wilcoxon检验,所有P≤0.001);在近距离时,Von Graefe试验与所有其他试验之间存在显著差异(Wilcoxon检验,所有P≤0.005)。关于AC/A比率,在+1.00 D AC/A比率中,除改良Thorington试验与交替遮盖试验外(Wilcoxon检验,P = 0.024),所有方法之间均观察到显著差异。在-1.00 D AC/A比率中,OptoTab POCKET与所有其他试验之间存在差异(Wilcoxon检验,所有P≤0.001)。结果表明,除远距离的改良Thorington试验和近距离的Von Graefe试验外,所有方法均可互换。对于AC/A比率,仅改良Thorington试验在使用+1.00 D镜片时可与交替遮盖试验互换,在使用-1.00 D镜片时,除OptoTab POCKET外所有方法均可互换。