Portela Dos Santos Omar, Perruchoud Élodie, Pereira Filipa, Alves Paulo, Verloo Henk
Department of Nursing Sciences, School of Health Sciences, HES-SO Valais/Wallis, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Chemin de l'Agasse 5, CH-1950 Sion, Switzerland.
Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde e Enfermagem, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua de Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal.
Nurs Rep. 2024 Oct 8;14(4):2850-2876. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14040209.
As early as 1995, the Institute of Medicine suggested that nurses were inadequately prepared for and educated about climate change and its health consequences. The aim of this systematic review is to identify the most reliable, robust, and valid instruments for measuring nurses' knowledge and awareness of climate change and climate-associated diseases.
Included studies were appraised using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool and the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. The psychometrics and clinimetrics of the instruments were evaluated using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist and the COSMIN methodology for assessing content validity.
Medline, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Ebesco, Cochrane Library Wiley, Web of Science Core Collection, Trip Database, JBI OVID SP, GreenFILE EBSCO, Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, and DART-EU were consulted. The 14 studies retained identified eight different instruments evaluating attitudes, perceptions, environmental awareness, environmental sensitivity, environmental attitudes, behaviours, motivation, concern, optimism, and experience. This review is reported according to the PRISMA guidelines.
The New Ecological Paradigm Scale (NEPS) and the Climate, Health, and Nursing Tool (CHANT) are the most reliable, robust, and valid instruments for measuring nurses' knowledge and awareness of climate change and climate-associated diseases.
早在1995年,医学研究所就指出,护士在应对气候变化及其对健康的影响方面准备不足,且接受的相关教育也不够。本系统评价的目的是确定用于衡量护士对气候变化及与气候相关疾病的知识和意识的最可靠、最有力且最有效的工具。
使用混合方法评价工具和横断面研究评价工具对纳入的研究进行评价。使用COSMIN偏倚风险清单和COSMIN内容效度评估方法对工具的心理测量学和临床测量学进行评估。
检索了Medline、PubMed、Embase、CINAHL Ebesco、Cochrane图书馆Wiley、科学引文索引核心合集、Trip数据库、JBI OVID SP、GreenFILE EBSCO、谷歌学术、ProQuest学位论文与全球博硕士论文数据库以及DART-EU。保留的14项研究确定了8种不同的工具,用于评估态度、认知、环境意识、环境敏感度、环境态度、行为、动机、关注、乐观态度和经验。本评价按照PRISMA指南进行报告。
新生态范式量表(NEPS)和气候、健康与护理工具(CHANT)是衡量护士对气候变化及与气候相关疾病的知识和意识的最可靠、最有力且最有效的工具。