Ribeiro Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes, Perondi Alessandro Rodrigues, Gomes Jane Tavares, Ventura-Silva João Miguel Almeida, Ribeiro Marlene Patrícia, Castro Susana Filipa Mendes de, Oliveira Tânia Dionísia Ferreira, Trindade Letícia de Lima
Nursing School of Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal.
Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS@RISE), 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.
Nurs Rep. 2024 Oct 9;14(4):2910-2922. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14040212.
Assessing the elements of nursing practice environments is crucial, as investing in their improvement will enhance outcomes for nurses, patients, and organizations. Moreover, comparing practice environments from different countries improves the definition of cross-cutting guidelines that can be applied in various contexts. Thus, this study aims to evaluate nursing practice environments in hospitals in Portugal and Brazil. A multicenter and cross-sectional study was conducted in eight Portuguese and eight Brazilian hospitals. Five hundred eighty-two nurses completed a survey regarding their sociodemographic and professional attributes, as well as the Scale for the Environments Evaluation of Professional Nursing Practice. The data were subjected to comparative analyses between the two countries. We adhered to ethical requirements in both participating countries. In Brazil, the Structure, Process, and Outcome components were considered favorable to the quality of care and well-being of nurses. In Portugal, nurses considered the Structure and Outcome components favorable and the Process component very favorable. Statistically significant differences were found between the two countries in several dimensions of the three subscales. The Structure and Outcome components scored significantly better in hospitals in Brazil, and the Process component scored better in Portuguese hospitals. These conclusions underscore the urgent need for investment in continuous training and a culture of evaluation that promotes continuous improvement. Additionally, promoting the involvement and participation of nurses could simultaneously contribute to the development of more sustainable health systems.
评估护理实践环境的要素至关重要,因为对其进行改进投资将改善护士、患者和组织的结局。此外,比较不同国家的实践环境有助于完善可应用于各种背景的跨领域指南的定义。因此,本研究旨在评估葡萄牙和巴西医院的护理实践环境。在八家葡萄牙医院和八家巴西医院开展了一项多中心横断面研究。582名护士完成了一项关于其社会人口统计学和专业属性的调查,以及专业护理实践环境评估量表。对两国的数据进行了比较分析。我们在两个参与国均遵守了伦理要求。在巴西,结构、过程和结果要素被认为有利于护理质量和护士的福祉。在葡萄牙,护士认为结构和结果要素有利,过程要素非常有利。在三个子量表的几个维度上,两国之间存在统计学显著差异。结构和结果要素在巴西医院的得分显著更高,过程要素在葡萄牙医院的得分更高。这些结论强调了迫切需要投资于持续培训以及促进持续改进的评估文化。此外,促进护士的参与和投入能够同时为更可持续的卫生系统的发展做出贡献。