Suppr超能文献

使用乙酰胆碱进行单独检测以评估内皮功能障碍和冠状动脉痉挛的必要性。

The Need for Separate Testing with Acetylcholine for the Assessment of Endothelial Dysfunction and Coronary Artery Spasm.

作者信息

Sueda Shozo, Sakaue Tomoki

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Ehime Niihama Prefectural Hospital Niihama, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Yawatahama City General Hospital Yawatahama, Japan.

出版信息

Eur Cardiol. 2024 Sep 19;19:e17. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2022.16. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Intracoronary acetylcholine (ACH) testing is clinically useful to diagnose the presence of the coronary vasomotor disorders coronary endothelial dysfunction and coronary epicardial/microvascular spasm. In Western countries, continuous intracoronary injection of ACH for 2-3 minutes without a pacemaker is the usual method, while rapid injection of ACH for 20-30 seconds with a pacemaker is the traditional procedure in Japan. Coronary microvascular spasm is often observed in Western populations, whereas coronary epicardial spasm is frequently seen in Japanese subjects. Methodological differences between Western and Japanese protocols may lead to the opposite prevalence of coronary vasomotor disorders. This article discusses the optimal method for diagnosing endothelial dysfunction and epicardial/microvascular spasm based on previous reports, and compares intracoronary ACH testing performed by Western cardiologists with that by Japanese physicians.

摘要

冠状动脉内乙酰胆碱(ACH)检测在临床上对于诊断冠状动脉血管舒缩障碍(冠状动脉内皮功能障碍和冠状动脉心外膜/微血管痉挛)的存在很有用。在西方国家,在没有起搏器的情况下持续冠状动脉内注射ACH 2至3分钟是常用方法,而在日本,使用起搏器快速注射ACH 20至30秒是传统程序。冠状动脉微血管痉挛在西方人群中经常观察到,而冠状动脉心外膜痉挛在日本受试者中经常出现。西方和日本方案之间的方法学差异可能导致冠状动脉血管舒缩障碍的相反患病率。本文基于先前的报告讨论了诊断内皮功能障碍和心外膜/微血管痉挛的最佳方法,并比较了西方心脏病专家和日本医生进行的冠状动脉内ACH检测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6f0/11499973/8fc4696a870f/ecr-19-e17-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验