Gonzalez Gabriel Gabi B, Dusic E J, Operario Don, Velasquez Mariebeth B, Restar Arjee
The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Transgend Health. 2024 Oct 9;9(5):444-453. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2022.0076. eCollection 2024 Oct.
We characterize trans-inclusive social and structural educational programming at Association of American Medical Colleges-affiliated U.S. allopathic medical and Council on Education for Public Health-accredited schools of public health using responses from deans and administrators.
Between December 2019 and February 2020, the Public Health and Medical Schools Transgender-Inclusive Educational Programming Study surveyed deans, administrators, and students via email about trans-inclusive social and structural educational programming strategies at their institution. Evaluated social programming included training topics, social events, and direct communications. Assessed structural strategies included admissions, policies, and mentorship. Descriptive statistics were performed for all variables while stratifying by medical versus public health schools. Bivariate analyses were used to examine differences between strata and chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, accordingly, to analyze programming strategies.
Of 335 deans and administrators contacted, 65 completed the survey (19% response rate) and 55.4% were from public health. Most were deans (87.7%), from public institutions (69.2%), between 51 and 59 years old (44.6%), and were ciswomen (63.5%). Comparisons of medical versus public health schools demonstrated significant differences in trans-inclusive strategies such as gender competency training (58.6% vs. 36.1%); trans-inclusive lectures (44.8% vs. 30.6%); honoring trans students' names in-person (75.9% vs. 61.1%); and goals to increase trans representation as researchers (37.5% vs. 26.7%).
Policies aimed at creating trans-inclusive environments in these institutions should focus on bolstering affirming structural programming, encouraging prospective trans applicants, mentoring trans students' research ambitions, and consistently using students' lived names, pronouns, and gender markers in all documentation and communications.
我们利用院长和管理人员的回复,对美国医学院协会附属的美国opathic医学院以及公共卫生教育委员会认可的公共卫生学院的跨性别包容社会和结构教育项目进行了特征描述。
2019年12月至2020年2月期间,公共卫生与医学院跨性别包容教育项目研究通过电子邮件对院长、管理人员和学生进行了调查,了解他们所在机构的跨性别包容社会和结构教育项目策略。评估的社会项目包括培训主题、社交活动和直接沟通。评估的结构策略包括招生、政策和指导。对所有变量进行描述性统计,并按医学院与公共卫生学院进行分层。采用双变量分析来检验各层之间的差异,并相应地使用卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验来分析项目策略。
在联系的335名院长和管理人员中,65人完成了调查(回复率为19%),55.4%来自公共卫生领域。大多数是院长(87.7%),来自公立机构(69.2%),年龄在51至59岁之间(44.6%),并且是顺性别女性(63.5%)。医学院与公共卫生学院的比较显示,在跨性别包容策略方面存在显著差异,如性别能力培训(58.6%对36.1%);跨性别包容讲座(44.8%对30.6%);当面称呼跨性别学生的名字(75.9%对61.1%);以及增加跨性别者作为研究人员代表性的目标(37.5%对26.7%)。
旨在在这些机构中营造跨性别包容环境的政策应侧重于加强肯定性的结构项目,鼓励潜在的跨性别申请者,指导跨性别学生的研究抱负,并在所有文件和沟通中始终使用学生的常用名字、代词和性别标识。