• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用脑皮质复杂性诊断阿尔茨海默病的机器学习模型

Machine learning models for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease using brain cortical complexity.

作者信息

Jiang Shaofan, Yang Siyu, Deng Kaiji, Jiang Rifeng, Xue Yunjing

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Oct 9;16:1434589. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1434589. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2024.1434589
PMID:39450051
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11500324/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models (MLMs) to diagnose Alzheimer's disease (AD) using cortical complexity indicated by fractal dimension (FD).

METHODS

A total of 296 participants with normal cognitive (NC) function and 182 with AD from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative database were randomly divided into training and internal validation cohorts. Then, FDs, demographic characteristics, baseline global cognitive function scales [Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ), Global Deterioration Scale (GDS), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)], phospho-tau (p-tau 181), amyloidβ-42/40, apolipoprotein E (APOE) and polygenic hazard score (PHS) were collected to establish multiple MLMs. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate model performance. Participants from our institution ( = 66; 33 with NC and 33 with AD) served as external validation cohorts to validate the MLMs. Decision curve analysis was used to estimate the models' clinical values.

RESULTS

The FDs from 30 out of 69 regions showed significant alteration. All MLMs were conducted based on the 30 significantly different FDs. The FD model had good accuracy in predicting AD in three cohorts [area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) = 0.842, 0.808, and 0.803]. There were no statistically significant differences in AUC values between the FD model and the other combined models in the training and internal validation cohorts except MoCA + FD and FAQ + FD models. Among MLMs, the MoCA + FD model showed the best predictive efficiency in three cohorts (AUC = 0.951, 0.931, and 0.955) and had the highest clinical net benefit.

CONCLUSION

The FD model showed favorable diagnostic performance for AD. Among MLMs, the MoCA + FD model can predict AD with the highest efficiency and could be used as a non-invasive diagnostic method.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发并验证机器学习模型(MLMs),以利用分形维数(FD)表示的皮质复杂性来诊断阿尔茨海默病(AD)。

方法

从AD神经影像倡议数据库中选取296名认知功能正常(NC)的参与者和182名AD患者,随机分为训练队列和内部验证队列。然后,收集FDs、人口统计学特征、基线整体认知功能量表[蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)、功能活动问卷(FAQ)、总体衰退量表(GDS)、神经精神量表(NPI)]、磷酸化tau蛋白(p-tau 181)、淀粉样β蛋白42/40、载脂蛋白E(APOE)和多基因风险评分(PHS),以建立多个MLMs。采用受试者工作特征曲线评估模型性能。来自本机构的参与者(n = 66;33名NC参与者和33名AD患者)作为外部验证队列来验证MLMs。采用决策曲线分析评估模型的临床价值。

结果

69个区域中的30个区域的FDs显示出显著变化。所有MLMs均基于这30个显著不同的FDs构建。FD模型在三个队列中预测AD具有良好的准确性[受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)= 0.842、0.808和0.803]。在训练队列和内部验证队列中,除MoCA + FD模型和FAQ + FD模型外,FD模型与其他联合模型的AUC值无统计学显著差异。在MLMs中,MoCA + FD模型在三个队列中显示出最佳预测效率(AUC = 0.951、0.931和0.955),且临床净效益最高。

结论

FD模型对AD显示出良好的诊断性能。在MLMs中,MoCA + FD模型能够以最高效率预测AD,可作为一种非侵入性诊断方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ea/11500324/d3a4c078c03b/fnagi-16-1434589-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ea/11500324/01ea3a5816a1/fnagi-16-1434589-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ea/11500324/55263f8a43f9/fnagi-16-1434589-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ea/11500324/45e9b85555a4/fnagi-16-1434589-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ea/11500324/d3a4c078c03b/fnagi-16-1434589-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ea/11500324/01ea3a5816a1/fnagi-16-1434589-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ea/11500324/55263f8a43f9/fnagi-16-1434589-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ea/11500324/45e9b85555a4/fnagi-16-1434589-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ea/11500324/d3a4c078c03b/fnagi-16-1434589-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning models for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease using brain cortical complexity.使用脑皮质复杂性诊断阿尔茨海默病的机器学习模型
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Oct 9;16:1434589. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1434589. eCollection 2024.
2
Choroid plexus volume as a novel candidate neuroimaging marker of the Alzheimer's continuum.脉络丛体积作为阿尔茨海默病连续体的新型神经影像学候选标志物。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024 Jul 3;16(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13195-024-01520-w.
3
ApoE4 effects on automated diagnostic classifiers for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.载脂蛋白E4对轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病自动诊断分类器的影响。
Neuroimage Clin. 2014 Jan 4;4:461-72. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.12.012. eCollection 2014.
4
Correlation Between Brain Structure Atrophy and Plasma Amyloid-β and Phosphorylated Tau in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease and Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment Explored by Surface-Based Morphometry.基于表面形态测量法探索阿尔茨海默病和遗忘型轻度认知障碍患者脑结构萎缩与血浆淀粉样β蛋白及磷酸化tau蛋白之间的相关性
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Apr 25;14:816043. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.816043. eCollection 2022.
5
Machine Learning Reveals a Multipredictor Nomogram for Diagnosing the Alzheimer's Disease Based on Chemiluminescence Immunoassay for Total Tau in Plasma.机器学习揭示了一种基于血浆总tau蛋白化学发光免疫分析诊断阿尔茨海默病的多预测因子列线图。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 May 13;14:863673. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.863673. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparing different algorithms for the course of Alzheimer's disease using machine learning.使用机器学习比较阿尔茨海默病病程的不同算法。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Sep;10(9):9715-9724. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-2013.
7
Predicting mild cognitive impairment progression to Alzheimer's disease based on machine learning analysis of cortical morphological features.基于皮质形态特征的机器学习分析预测轻度认知障碍向阿尔茨海默病的进展。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Aug;35(8):1721-1730. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02456-1. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
8
A subtest analysis of the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA): which subtests can best discriminate between healthy controls, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease?蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)的子测验分析:哪些子测验能最佳区分健康对照、轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病?
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 May;28(5):825-32. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215001982. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
9
XGBoost-SHAP-based interpretable diagnostic framework for alzheimer's disease.基于 XGBoost-SHAP 的阿尔茨海默病可解释诊断框架。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jul 25;23(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02238-9.
10
Comparing machine learning-derived MRI-based and blood-based neurodegeneration biomarkers in predicting syndromal conversion in early AD.比较基于机器学习的磁共振成像(MRI)和血液神经退行性生物标志物在预测早期阿尔茨海默病(AD)综合征性转化中的作用。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Nov;19(11):4987-4998. doi: 10.1002/alz.13083. Epub 2023 Apr 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Suicidality in Adolescents With Allergic Rhinitis: Derivation and Validation in 2 Independent Nationwide Cohorts.基于机器学习的青少年变应性鼻炎自杀倾向预测:在 2 个独立的全国性队列中的推导和验证。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 14;26:e51473. doi: 10.2196/51473.
2
Identification and validation of an explainable prediction model of acute kidney injury with prognostic implications in critically ill children: a prospective multicenter cohort study.识别并验证一种对危重症儿童急性肾损伤具有预后意义的可解释预测模型:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Jan 5;68:102409. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102409. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Structural, static, and dynamic functional MRI predictors for conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease: Inter-cohort validation of Shanghai Memory Study and ADNI.
结构、静息态和动态功能 MRI 预测指标在轻度认知障碍向阿尔茨海默病转化中的应用:上海记忆研究与 ADNI 的队列间验证。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Jan;45(1):e26529. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26529. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
4
Machine learning-based quantification for disease uncertainty increases the statistical power of genetic association studies.基于机器学习的疾病不确定性量化方法提高了遗传关联研究的统计功效。
Bioinformatics. 2023 Sep 2;39(9). doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad534.
5
Fractal dimension: analyzing its potential as a neuroimaging biomarker for brain tumor diagnosis using machine learning.分形维数:利用机器学习分析其作为脑肿瘤诊断神经影像生物标志物的潜力。
Front Physiol. 2023 Jul 17;14:1201617. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1201617. eCollection 2023.
6
XGBoost-SHAP-based interpretable diagnostic framework for alzheimer's disease.基于 XGBoost-SHAP 的阿尔茨海默病可解释诊断框架。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jul 25;23(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02238-9.
7
Quantitative Brain MRI Metrics Distinguish Four Different ALS Phenotypes: A Machine Learning Based Study.定量脑磁共振成像指标可区分四种不同的肌萎缩侧索硬化症表型:一项基于机器学习的研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Apr 24;13(9):1521. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091521.
8
Comparing machine learning-derived MRI-based and blood-based neurodegeneration biomarkers in predicting syndromal conversion in early AD.比较基于机器学习的磁共振成像(MRI)和血液神经退行性生物标志物在预测早期阿尔茨海默病(AD)综合征性转化中的作用。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Nov;19(11):4987-4998. doi: 10.1002/alz.13083. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
9
Hybridized Deep Learning Approach for Detecting Alzheimer's Disease.用于检测阿尔茨海默病的混合深度学习方法
Biomedicines. 2023 Jan 6;11(1):149. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11010149.
10
Predicting AT(N) pathologies in Alzheimer's disease from blood-based proteomic data using neural networks.使用神经网络从基于血液的蛋白质组学数据预测阿尔茨海默病中的AT(N)病理。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Nov 29;14:1040001. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1040001. eCollection 2022.