Vaskivuo Laura, Hokkanen Laura, Levälahti Esko, Hänninen Tuomo, Antikainen Riitta, Bäckman Lars, Laatikainen Tiina, Paajanen Teemu, Stigsdotter Neely Anna, Strandberg Timo, Tuomilehto Jaakko, Soininen Hilkka, Kivipelto Miia, Ngandu Tiia
Department of Public Health, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Dec 11;80(1). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae179.
Older people reporting subjective memory complaints (SMCs) may have a greater risk of cognitive decline. Multidomain lifestyle interventions are a promising strategy for the prevention of cognitive decline. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the presence of SMCs affects the efficacy of a 2-year multidomain lifestyle intervention on cognition.
This study is part of the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) project. Participants (a subsample of 568 individuals, baseline age 60-77 years) were randomized (1:1) to receive a 2-year multidomain lifestyle intervention group including dietary advice, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk management, or regular health advice control group. Cognitive performance was assessed at baseline and at 1- and 2-year visits, using a neuropsychological test battery, including tests assessing memory, executive functions, and processing speed. Participants rated the frequency of SMCs using the Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire.
Having more retrospective SMCs was linked to a less favorable cognitive trajectory over 2 years. The difference between the intervention and control groups in annual change in tested memory performance was 0.077 (95% CI, 0.008-0.146) among those reporting more retrospective SMCs and -0.011 (-0.074 to 0.053) among those with less SMCs; interaction effect p = .019. No other interactions between SMCs and intervention allocation were observed.
A lifestyle intervention may be beneficial for older adults with and without SMCs. Persons having more retrospective SMCs may benefit more from the intervention regarding memory functioning. Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT01041989.
报告主观记忆抱怨(SMC)的老年人认知衰退风险可能更高。多领域生活方式干预是预防认知衰退的一种有前景的策略。本研究的目的是调查SMC的存在是否会影响为期2年的多领域生活方式干预对认知的疗效。
本研究是芬兰预防认知障碍和残疾老年干预研究(FINGER)项目的一部分。参与者(568名个体的子样本,基线年龄60 - 77岁)被随机(1:1)分配到接受为期2年的多领域生活方式干预组,包括饮食建议、运动、认知训练和血管风险管理,或常规健康建议对照组。在基线以及1年和2年随访时,使用一套神经心理测试评估认知表现,包括评估记忆、执行功能和处理速度的测试。参与者使用前瞻性和回顾性记忆问卷对SMC的频率进行评分。
有更多回顾性SMC与2年期间不太有利的认知轨迹相关。在报告更多回顾性SMC的人群中,干预组和对照组在测试记忆表现的年度变化上的差异为0.077(95%CI,0.008 - 0.146),而在SMC较少的人群中为 - 0.011(-0.074至0.053);交互作用p = 0.019。未观察到SMC与干预分配之间的其他交互作用。
生活方式干预可能对有或没有SMC的老年人有益。有更多回顾性SMC的人在记忆功能方面可能从干预中获益更多。临床试验注册号:NCT01041989。