Abshire Saylor Martha, Qian Yiqing, Hladek Melissa, Blinka Marcela D, Szanton Sarah L, Fabius Chanee D, Haley William E, Roth David L
Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Appl Gerontol. 2025 May;44(5):804-814. doi: 10.1177/07334648241288986. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
Family caregiving may affect purpose in life, defined as the sense that life has meaning and intentionality. Few studies have compared caregivers to non-caregivers or examined the characteristics of caregivers associated with purpose in life. Using data from the Caregiving Transitions Study ( = 486), we conducted multiple linear regression analyses to test the effects of caregiver status, age, gender, social network, and physical and mental health on purpose in life. We also tested whether the effect of caregiver status differed by race and, among caregivers ( = 241), the associations between caregiving characteristics and purpose in life. Caregivers did not differ significantly from non-caregivers in purpose in life in adjusted analysis. Among caregivers, significantly greater purpose of life was observed among Black caregivers and those reporting higher positive aspects of caregiving. Future research should examine these issues longitudinally, and caregiver interventions should consider addressing purpose in life and positive aspects of caregiving.
家庭照料可能会影响生活目的,生活目的被定义为一种生活具有意义和意向性的感觉。很少有研究将照料者与非照料者进行比较,或考察与生活目的相关的照料者特征。利用照料转变研究(n = 486)的数据,我们进行了多元线性回归分析,以检验照料者状态、年龄、性别、社会网络以及身心健康对生活目的的影响。我们还检验了照料者状态的影响是否因种族而异,以及在照料者中(n = 241),照料特征与生活目的之间的关联。在调整分析中,照料者与非照料者在生活目的上没有显著差异。在照料者中,黑人照料者以及那些报告照料积极方面程度较高的照料者的生活目的显著更强。未来的研究应该纵向考察这些问题,并且照料者干预措施应该考虑解决生活目的以及照料的积极方面。