Suppr超能文献

临床医生调查中的金钱激励:一项以确立最佳实践为重点的分析与系统评价

Monetary Incentives in Clinician Surveys: An Analysis and Systematic Review With a Focus on Establishing Best Practices.

作者信息

VanGeest Jonathan B, Johnson Timothy P, Kapousouz Evgenia

机构信息

Kent State University, USA.

University of Illinois at Chicago, USA.

出版信息

Eval Health Prof. 2025 Jun;48(2):256-276. doi: 10.1177/01632787241295794. Epub 2024 Oct 25.

Abstract

Surveys involving health care providers continue to be characterized by low and declining response rates (RRs), and researchers have utilized various strategies to increase survey participation. An important approach is to employ monetary incentives to improve survey response. Using a systematic review and analyses of 100 randomized comparisons (published in 48 papers) between monetary incentives and a non-incentive condition, this paper seeks to advance the understanding of best practices for using monetary incentives in clinician surveys. These analyses show even small incentives (≤$2) to be effective in improving clinician response relative to non-incentive subgroups, with diminished returns associated with serial incremental increases above that amount up to amounts greater than $25, at which point there is an appreciable improvement, supporting the use of higher incentives in this population. Cash and direct cash equivalents (e.g., cash cards and checks) produced greater odds of survey participation compared to vouchers, lotteries and charitable contributions, with lotteries and charities being the least effective forms of monetary incentive. Survey mode, timing and ethical considerations are also addressed. Noting the challenges associated with surveying clinicians, researchers must make every effort to improve access to this difficult-to-reach population by implementing appropriate incentive-based strategies designed to improve participation rates.

摘要

涉及医疗保健提供者的调查的特点仍然是回复率低且呈下降趋势,研究人员已采用各种策略来提高调查参与度。一种重要的方法是采用金钱激励措施来提高调查回复率。本文通过对金钱激励与无激励条件之间的100项随机对照(发表在48篇论文中)进行系统综述和分析,旨在增进对在临床医生调查中使用金钱激励措施的最佳做法的理解。这些分析表明,相对于无激励子组,即使是小额激励(≤2美元)也能有效提高临床医生的回复率,超过该金额直至超过25美元的连续增量增加会带来收益递减,而在25美元以上会有明显改善,这支持在该人群中使用更高的激励措施。与代金券、抽奖和慈善捐款相比,现金及直接现金等价物(如现金卡和支票)产生更高的调查参与几率,抽奖和慈善是最无效的金钱激励形式。还讨论了调查方式、时间安排和伦理考量。鉴于对临床医生进行调查存在的挑战,研究人员必须尽一切努力,通过实施旨在提高参与率的适当激励策略,改善对这一难以接触到的人群的调查。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验