• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者安全评估工具:一项范围综述

Instruments for Patient Safety Assessment: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Nunes Elisabete, Sirtoli Fernanda, Lima Eliane, Minarini Greyce, Gaspar Filomena, Lucas Pedro, Primo Cândida

机构信息

Nursing Research, Innovation, and Development Centre of Lisbon [CIDNUR], Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1600-190 Lisboa, Portugal.

Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Campus de Maruípe, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Avenida Marechal Campos, 1.468, Vitória 29047-105, ES, Brazil.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 18;12(20):2075. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12202075.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare12202075
PMID:39451490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11508098/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient safety is an important component of healthcare service quality, and there are numerous instruments in the literature that measure patient safety. This scoping reviewaims to map the instruments/scales for assessing patient safety in healthcare services.

METHOD

This scoping review follows the JBI methodology. The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework. Eligibility criteria were defined based on studies that include instruments or scales for assessing patient safety in healthcare services, in any language, and without temporal restrictions. It adhered to all scoping review checklist items [PRISMA-ScR], with searches in the Embase, Lilacs, MedLine, and Scopus databases, as well as the repository of the Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations. Two independent reviewers performed selection and data extraction in July 2023.

RESULTS

Of the 4019 potential titles, 63 studies reported on a total of 47 instruments/scales and 71 dimensions for patient safety assessment. The most-described dimensions were teamwork, professional satisfaction, safety climate, communication, and working conditions.

CONCLUSION

The diversity of instruments and dimensions for patient safety assessment characterizes the multidimensionality and scope of patient safety. However, it hinders benchmarking between institutions and healthcare units.

摘要

背景

患者安全是医疗服务质量的重要组成部分,文献中有众多衡量患者安全的工具。本综述旨在梳理用于评估医疗服务中患者安全的工具/量表。

方法

本综述遵循循证卫生保健国际协作网(JBI)的方法。该方案已在开放科学框架上注册。纳入标准基于包含用于评估医疗服务中患者安全的工具或量表的研究,不限语言,无时间限制。本综述遵循所有范围综述清单项目[系统评价和Meta分析扩展版的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)],检索了Embase、Lilacs、Medline和Scopus数据库,以及巴西数字论文和学位论文库。2023年7月,两名独立评审员进行了筛选和数据提取。

结果

在4019个潜在标题中,63项研究报告了总共47种用于患者安全评估的工具/量表和71个维度。描述最多的维度是团队合作、职业满意度、安全氛围、沟通和工作条件。

结论

患者安全评估工具和维度的多样性体现了患者安全的多维度性和范围。然而,这阻碍了不同机构和医疗单位之间的基准比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8114/11508098/76ede5e61b66/healthcare-12-02075-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8114/11508098/76ede5e61b66/healthcare-12-02075-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8114/11508098/76ede5e61b66/healthcare-12-02075-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Instruments for Patient Safety Assessment: A Scoping Review.患者安全评估工具:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 18;12(20):2075. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12202075.
2
Sustainability of Interprofessional Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review.跨专业教育的可持续性:一项范围审查方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Dec 9;13:e60763. doi: 10.2196/60763.
3
Assessment of the quality of services of reception with risk classification in obstetrics: a scoping review protocol.评估具有风险分类的产科接待服务质量:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 12;13(4):e066009. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066009.
4
The Use of Spatial Analysis in Syphilis-Related Research: Protocol for a Scoping Review.梅毒相关研究中空间分析的应用:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Apr 25;12:e43243. doi: 10.2196/43243.
5
Use of the Maslach Burnout Inventory Among Public Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review.公共卫生保健专业人员中马氏职业倦怠量表的使用:范围综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Jul 21;10:e44195. doi: 10.2196/44195.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
eHealth Tools Supporting Early Childhood Education and Care Centers to Assess and Enhance Nutrition and Physical Activity Environments: Protocol for a Scoping Review.支持幼儿教育与照料中心评估和改善营养与身体活动环境的电子健康工具:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Oct 24;12:e52252. doi: 10.2196/52252.
8
Mapping Strategies for Strengthening Safety Culture: A Scoping Review.加强安全文化的映射策略:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jun 13;12(12):1194. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12121194.
9
Therapeutic Guidelines for the Self-Management of Major Depressive Disorder: Scoping Review.重度抑郁症自我管理的治疗指南:范围综述
Interact J Med Res. 2025 Mar 6;14:e63959. doi: 10.2196/63959.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Participation in Patient Safety Practices Scale: Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a Scale.患者参与患者安全实践量表:量表的编制与心理测量学评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 11;13(12):1387. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121387.
2
Patient safety culture in resource-limited healthcare settings: A multicentre survey.资源有限的医疗环境中的患者安全文化:一项多中心调查。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0326320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326320. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Analyzing interprofessional teamwork in the operating room: An exploratory observational study using conventional and alternative approaches.分析手术室中的跨专业团队合作:使用常规和替代方法的探索性观察研究。
J Interprof Care. 2023 Sep 3;37(5):715-724. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2023.2171373. Epub 2023 Feb 5.
2
Barriers and enablers to nurses' use of harm prevention strategies for older patients in hospital: A cross-sectional survey.护士在医院中使用伤害预防策略对老年患者的障碍和促进因素:一项横断面调查。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Nov;78(11):3710-3720. doi: 10.1111/jan.15269. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
3
Patient safety culture improvements depend on basic healthcare education: a longitudinal simulation-based intervention study at two Danish hospitals.
患者安全文化的改善依赖于基本的医疗保健教育:在丹麦两家医院进行的一项基于模拟的纵向干预研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Mar;11(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001658.
4
Effectiveness of customised safety intervention programmes to increase the safety culture of hospital staff.定制安全干预方案以提高医院员工安全文化的有效性。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Oct;10(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000962.
5
Impact on Patient Safety Culture by the Intervention of Multidisciplinary Medical Teams.多学科医疗团队干预对患者安全文化的影响。
J Patient Saf. 2022 Apr 1;18(3):e601-e605. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000891.
6
The Effect of Providing Staff Training and Enhanced Support to Care Homes on Care Processes, Safety Climate and Avoidable Harms: Evaluation of a Care Home Quality Improvement Programme in England.为养老院提供员工培训和加强支持对护理流程、安全氛围和可避免伤害的影响:英格兰养老院质量改进计划的评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 16;18(14):7581. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147581.
7
Safety culture in healthcare: mixed method study.医疗保健中的安全文化:混合方法研究。
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Jul 15;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-04-2020-0110.
8
Impact of Teamwork and Communication Training Interventions on Safety Culture and Patient Safety in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review.团队合作和沟通培训干预对急诊科安全文化和患者安全的影响:系统评价。
J Patient Saf. 2022 Jan 1;18(1):e351-e361. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000782.
9
Questionnaire for assessing patient safety culture in emergency services: an integrative review.评估急救服务中患者安全文化的问卷:一项综合综述。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 Apr 16;74(2):e20190693. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0693. eCollection 2021.
10
Does interprofessional team-training affect nurses' and physicians' perceptions of safety culture and communication practices? Results of a pre-post survey study.跨专业团队培训是否会影响护士和医生对安全文化和沟通实践的看法?一项前后测调查研究的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 14;21(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06137-5.