Bakkaloglu Oguz Kagan, Sen Gozde, Kepil Nuray, Eskazan Tugce, Kurt Enes Ali, Onal Ugur, Candan Selcuk, Balamir Melek, Hatemi Ibrahim, Erzin Yusuf, Celik Aykut Ferhat
Department of Gastroenterology, Kartal Kosuyolu High Specialization Education and Research Hospital, 34865 Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa, 34098 Istanbul, Turkey.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 14;14(20):2283. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14202283.
We have previously shown that CRP < 2.9 mg/L is a better predictor of endoscopic remission (ER) than CRP < 5 mg/L in ulcerative colitis (UC). Here, we prospectively evaluate CRP and FCP cut-offs and compare them in predicting ER and histological remission (HR) in UC. One hundred thirty-five steroid-free UC patients were evaluated prospectively. ER was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub-score 0-1. In colonoscopy, the colon was evaluated as seven segments: rectum, sigmoid, descending, proximal-transverse, distal-transverse, ascending colon, and cecum. Two biopsies of each segment were evaluated for histological inflammation and graded using the Nancy and Geboes scores. All segment biopsies with Nancy < 1 and Geboes < 2 were defined as HR. The optimum cut-off values for FCP and CRP were 120 μg/g and 2.75 mg/L for ER, respectively. AUC values of FCP and CRP were similar for ER and Mayo-0 disease in ROC analysis. CRP and FCP also had similar performances with these cut-offs regarding ER. While CRP was a predictor to assess the extensiveness of active UC, FCP was not. ROC analysis showed no difference between CRP and FCP regarding HR. Cut-off values for HR were 2.1 mg/L and 55 μg/g for CRP and FCP, respectively. CRP and FCP, in combination with the mentioned cut-off values, detected ER and HR in nearly 2/3 and ½ of the patients, respectively, with high specificity. Reappraised CRP (ER: 2.75 mg/L, HR: 2.1 mg/L) has as much diagnostic contribution as relevant FCP in predicting ER and HR and contributes more to revealing the proximal extension in active colitis compared to FCP. Relevant CRP and FCP combinations may improve the prediction rates.
我们之前已经表明,在溃疡性结肠炎(UC)中,与CRP<5mg/L相比,CRP<2.9mg/L是内镜缓解(ER)更好的预测指标。在此,我们前瞻性评估CRP和粪便钙卫蛋白(FCP)的临界值,并比较它们在预测UC患者的ER和组织学缓解(HR)方面的作用。对135例未使用类固醇的UC患者进行了前瞻性评估。ER定义为梅奥内镜亚评分0 - 1。在结肠镜检查中,将结肠分为七个节段进行评估:直肠、乙状结肠、降结肠、近端横结肠、远端横结肠、升结肠和盲肠。对每个节段取两块活检组织进行组织学炎症评估,并使用南希和格博斯评分进行分级。所有南希评分<1且格博斯评分<2的节段活检组织定义为HR。对于ER,FCP和CRP的最佳临界值分别为120μg/g和2.75mg/L。在ROC分析中,FCP和CRP对于ER和梅奥0级疾病的AUC值相似。CRP和FCP在这些临界值下对于ER也具有相似的表现。虽然CRP是评估活动性UC范围的预测指标,但FCP不是。ROC分析显示CRP和FCP在HR方面无差异。对于HR,CRP和FCP的临界值分别为2.1mg/L和55μg/g。CRP和FCP与上述临界值相结合,分别在近2/3和1/2的患者中检测到ER和HR,具有较高的特异性。重新评估的CRP(ER:2.75mg/L,HR:2.1mg/L)在预测ER和HR方面与相关FCP具有同样多的诊断贡献,并且与FCP相比,在揭示活动性结肠炎的近端扩展方面贡献更大。相关的CRP和FCP联合使用可能会提高预测率。