Suppr超能文献

口服阿奇霉素三日疗法与口服克拉霉素五日疗法治疗儿童弯曲菌肠炎的前瞻性研究

Three Days of Oral Azithromycin Versus Five Days of Oral Clarithromycin in the Treatment of Campylobacter Enterocolitis in Children: A Prospective Study.

作者信息

Kang Hyun Mi, Cho Yoon Kyung, Kim Ye Ji, Jeong Dae Chul, Yoo In Hyuk

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea.

Vaccine Bio Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Oct 14;13(10):969. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13100969.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of azithromycin and clarithromycin in pediatric enterocolitis.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted at a single center. Patients with confirmed enterocolitis were randomly assigned to receive either a 3-day course of azithromycin or a 5-day course of clarithromycin. Symptoms were monitored daily, and changes in laboratory markers (WBC counts, CRP levels, and stool calprotectin) were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 29 pediatric patients were included, with 14 patients in the azithromycin group and 15 patients in the clarithromycin group. The median age of patients in the azithromycin group was 10.0 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.0-13.0), and in the clarithromycin group, the median age was 9.0 years (IQR: 7.0-13.0) ( = 0.793). The median time to clinical resolution was 3.0 days (IQR: 2.0-3.0) in the azithromycin group and 2.0 days (IQR: 2.0-3.0) in the clarithromycin group ( = 0.132). There were no significant differences in the duration of individual symptoms, including fever, vomiting, and abdominal pain. The length of hospital stay was also similar, with a median stay of 4 days (IQR: 3.0-5.0) in both groups ( = 0.394). Both antibiotics were well-tolerated, with no significant adverse events or treatment discontinuation reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Clarithromycin was found to be as effective as azithromycin in treating pediatric enterocolitis, with similar clinical outcomes and improvements in laboratory markers.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较阿奇霉素和克拉霉素治疗小儿小肠结肠炎的疗效和耐受性。

方法

在单一中心进行一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。确诊为小肠结肠炎的患者被随机分配接受为期3天的阿奇霉素疗程或为期5天的克拉霉素疗程。每天监测症状,并比较实验室指标(白细胞计数、CRP水平和粪便钙卫蛋白)的变化。

结果

共纳入29例儿科患者,阿奇霉素组14例,克拉霉素组15例。阿奇霉素组患者的中位年龄为10.0岁(四分位间距[IQR]:5.0 - 13.0),克拉霉素组的中位年龄为9.0岁(IQR:7.0 - 13.0)(P = 0.793)。阿奇霉素组临床症状缓解的中位时间为3.0天(IQR:2.0 - 3.0),克拉霉素组为2.0天(IQR:2.0 - 3.0)(P = 0.132)。包括发热、呕吐和腹痛在内的各个症状的持续时间无显著差异。住院时间也相似,两组的中位住院时间均为4天(IQR:3.0 - 5.0)(P = 0.394)。两种抗生素耐受性良好,未报告显著不良事件或治疗中断情况。

结论

发现克拉霉素在治疗小儿小肠结肠炎方面与阿奇霉素效果相当,临床结果和实验室指标改善情况相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b8f/11504726/550ae5d09e74/antibiotics-13-00969-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验