• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后患者的身体功能和韧性的临床意义。

Clinical Implications of Physical Function and Resilience in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

机构信息

Structural Heart and Valve Center Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN.

Cardiovascular Medicine Division Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Sep;9(17):e017075. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017075. Epub 2020 Aug 28.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.120.017075
PMID:32856530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7660783/
Abstract

Background Gait speed is a reliable measure of physical function and frailty in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Slow gait speed pre-TAVR predicts worse clinical outcomes post-TAVR. The consequences of improved versus worsened physical function post-TAVR are unknown. Methods and Results The REPRISE III (Repositionable Percutaneous Replacement of Stenotic Aortic Valve Through Implantation of Lotus Valve System-Randomized Clinical Evaluation) trial randomized high/extreme risk patients to receive a mechanically-expanded or self-expanding transcatheter heart valve. Of 874 patients who underwent TAVR, 576 with complete data at baseline and 1 year were included in this analysis. Slow gait speed in the 5-m walk test was defined as <0.83 m/s. A clinically meaningful improvement (≥0.1 m/s) in gait speed 1 year after TAVR occurred in 39% of patients, 35% exhibited no change, and 26% declined (≥0.1 m/s). Among groups defined by baseline/1-year post-TAVR gait speeds, 1- to 2-year mortality or hospitalization rates were as follows: 6.6% (normal/normal), 8.0% (slow/normal), 20.9% (normal/slow), and 21.5% (slow/slow). After adjustment, slow gait speed at 1 year (regardless of baseline speed) was associated with a 3.5-fold increase in death/hospitalization between 1 and 2 years compared with those with normal baseline/1-year gait speed. Patients whose slow gait speed normalized at 1 year had no increased risk. One-year, but not baseline, gait speed was associated with death or hospitalization between 1 and 2 years (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.83 per 0.1 m/s faster gait; 95% CI, 0.74-0.93, =0.001). Conclusions Marked heterogeneity exists in the trajectory of physical function after TAVR and this, more than baseline function, has clinical consequences. Identifying and optimizing factors associated with physical resilience after TAVR may improve outcomes. Registration URL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02202434.

摘要

背景

在接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,步速是身体功能和虚弱的可靠衡量标准。TAVR 前步速较慢预示着 TAVR 后临床结局较差。TAVR 后身体功能改善与恶化的后果尚不清楚。

方法和结果

REPRISE III(通过植入 Lotus 瓣膜系统经皮置换狭窄主动脉瓣的可重新定位的经皮置换-随机临床评估)试验将高危/极高危患者随机分为接受机械扩张或自扩张经导管心脏瓣膜治疗。在接受 TAVR 的 874 例患者中,有 576 例患者在基线和 1 年时具有完整数据,纳入本分析。5 米步行测试中步速较慢定义为<0.83 m/s。TAVR 后 1 年,39%的患者步速有临床意义的改善(≥0.1 m/s),35%无变化,26%下降(≥0.1 m/s)。根据基线/1 年后 TAVR 步速分组,1 至 2 年死亡率或住院率如下:6.6%(正常/正常)、8.0%(缓慢/正常)、20.9%(正常/缓慢)和 21.5%(缓慢/缓慢)。校正后,1 年时步速缓慢(无论基线速度如何)与 1 至 2 年内死亡/住院风险增加 3.5 倍相关,与基线/1 年步速正常的患者相比。1 年内步速缓慢恢复正常的患者无增加的风险。1 年时的步速,而不是基线时的步速,与 1 至 2 年内的死亡或住院相关(校正后的危险比,每 0.1 m/s 更快的步速增加 0.83;95%CI,0.74-0.93,=0.001)。

结论

TAVR 后身体功能的轨迹存在明显的异质性,而且这比基线功能更具有临床意义。确定和优化 TAVR 后身体恢复力相关的因素可能改善结局。

注册网址

https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov;独特标识符:NCT02202434。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7611/7660783/d8ef90c3bc03/JAH3-9-e017075-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7611/7660783/0f01ca0ae343/JAH3-9-e017075-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7611/7660783/90ce0818b6a6/JAH3-9-e017075-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7611/7660783/d8ef90c3bc03/JAH3-9-e017075-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7611/7660783/0f01ca0ae343/JAH3-9-e017075-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7611/7660783/90ce0818b6a6/JAH3-9-e017075-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7611/7660783/d8ef90c3bc03/JAH3-9-e017075-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical Implications of Physical Function and Resilience in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后患者的身体功能和韧性的临床意义。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Sep;9(17):e017075. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017075. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
2
Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery: A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction.高危手术患者中经导管主动脉瓣自膨胀置换术与外科瓣膜置换术的比较:一项关于超声心动图变化及风险预测的研究
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003426.
3
Gait Speed Can Predict Advanced Clinical Outcomes in Patients Who Undergo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From a Japanese Multicenter Registry.步态速度可预测行经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的晚期临床结局:来自日本多中心注册研究的结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Sep;10(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005088.
4
Effect of Mechanically Expanded vs Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Mortality and Major Adverse Clinical Events in High-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis: The REPRISE III Randomized Clinical Trial.机械扩张式与自膨胀式经导管主动脉瓣置换术对高危主动脉瓣狭窄患者死亡率和主要不良临床事件的影响:REPRISE III随机临床试验
JAMA. 2018 Jan 2;319(1):27-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19132.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Intermediate Risk.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中危重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的成本效果分析。
Circulation. 2019 Feb 12;139(7):877-888. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035236.
6
Computed Tomography-Based Indexed Aortic Annulus Size to Predict Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.基于计算机断层扫描的主动脉瓣环大小指数预测人工瓣膜-患者不匹配。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr;12(4):e007396. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007396.
7
Gait Speed Predicts 30-Day Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.步态速度可预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 30 天的死亡率:来自胸外科医生学会/美国心脏病学会经导管瓣膜治疗登记处的结果。
Circulation. 2016 Apr 5;133(14):1351-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020279. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
8
Two-Year Outcomes in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Randomized to Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: The All-Comers Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention Randomized Clinical Trial.重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者随机接受经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的两年结果:全人群北欧主动脉瓣干预随机临床试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003665.
9
Prognostic implications of baseline 6-min walk test performance in intermediate risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.基线 6 分钟步行试验在接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的中危患者中的预后意义。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 1;97(1):E154-E160. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28981. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
10
Long-term Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the Lotus Valve vs CoreValve/EvolutR: A Secondary Analysis of the REPRISE III Randomized Clinical Trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与 Lotus 瓣膜与 CoreValve/EvolutR 的长期结果:REPRISE III 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2238792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38792.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of neurocognitive function changes based on the full neuropsychological test battery after transcatheter aortic valve replacement under monitored anaesthesia care.在麻醉监护下经导管主动脉瓣置换术后,基于完整神经心理测试组评估神经认知功能变化。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 8;25(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06168-1.
2
Effect of Frailty on Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.衰弱对心血管临床试验的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JACC Adv. 2025 Jun 23;4(7):101889. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101889.
3
Osteosarcopenia in older adults undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A narrative review of mortality and frailty implications.

本文引用的文献

1
Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Scientific Statement From the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology.家庭心脏康复:美国心血管和肺脏康复协会、美国心脏协会和美国心脏病学会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2019 Jul 2;140(1):e69-e89. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000663. Epub 2019 May 13.
2
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
3
接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的老年人中的骨质肌肉减少症:关于死亡率和衰弱影响的叙述性综述
World J Cardiol. 2025 May 26;17(5):107320. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i5.107320.
4
The Impact of Frailty and Surgical Risk on Health-Related Quality of Life After TAVI.衰弱和手术风险对经导管主动脉瓣植入术后健康相关生活质量的影响。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Oct 18;11(10):333. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11100333.
5
Predictors and Variation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后心脏康复参与情况的预测因素及差异
JACC Adv. 2023 Sep 16;2(8):100581. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100581. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Five-meter walk test before transcatheter aortic valve replacement and 1-year noncardiac mortality.经导管主动脉瓣置换术前的5米步行试验与1年非心脏死亡率
JTCVS Open. 2022 Aug 18;12:103-117. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.08.003. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Cardiac rehabilitation for older adults: current evidence and future potential.老年人心脏康复:当前证据和未来潜力。
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2022 Jan;20(1):13-34. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2022.2035722. Epub 2022 Feb 13.
8
Effect of a pragmatic home-based mobile health exercise intervention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a randomized pilot trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后基于家庭的实用移动健康运动干预的效果:一项随机试点试验。
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021 Feb 4;2(1):90-103. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztab007. eCollection 2021 Mar.
9
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cardiovascular Trials.心血管临床试验中的患者报告结局。
Can J Cardiol. 2021 Sep;37(9):1340-1352. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 May 8.
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者的自膨式瓣膜。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
4
Evaluation of Changes in Functional Status in the Year After Aortic Valve Replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后 1 年功能状态变化的评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Mar 1;179(3):383-391. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6738.
5
Gait Speed and 1-Year Mortality Following Cardiac Surgery: A Landmark Analysis From the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database.心脏手术后的步态速度与 1 年死亡率:来自胸外科协会成人心脏手术数据库的里程碑分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Dec 4;7(23):e010139. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010139.
6
Geographic Variation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation in Medicare and Veterans Affairs Populations: Opportunity for Improvement.医疗保险和退伍军人事务人群中心脏康复参与的地域差异:改善的机会。
Circulation. 2018 May 1;137(18):1899-1908. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029471. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
7
Effect of Mechanically Expanded vs Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Mortality and Major Adverse Clinical Events in High-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis: The REPRISE III Randomized Clinical Trial.机械扩张式与自膨胀式经导管主动脉瓣置换术对高危主动脉瓣狭窄患者死亡率和主要不良临床事件的影响:REPRISE III随机临床试验
JAMA. 2018 Jan 2;319(1):27-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19132.
8
Frailty in Older Adults Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: The FRAILTY-AVR Study.老年主动脉瓣置换术患者的衰弱:FRAILTY-AVR 研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 8;70(6):689-700. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.024. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
9
Predictors and Association With Clinical Outcomes of the Changes in Exercise Capacity After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后运动能力变化的预测因素及其与临床结局的关联。
Circulation. 2017 Aug 15;136(7):632-643. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026349. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
10
Report: NIA Workshop on Measures of Physiologic Resiliencies in Human Aging.报告:美国国立衰老研究所人类衰老生理弹性测量研讨会
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Jul 1;72(7):980-990. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx015.