Suppr超能文献

转诊医院的门到门时间与出血性中风的治疗结果

Door-In-Door-Out Times at Referring Hospitals and Outcomes of Hemorrhagic Stroke.

作者信息

Royan Regina, Ayodele Iyanuoluwa, Stamm Brian, Alhanti Brooke, Sheth Kevin N, Pruitt Peter, Mac Grory Brian C, Meurer William J, Prabhakaran Shyam

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2025 Feb;85(2):132-143. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.09.002. Epub 2024 Oct 22.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Interhospital transfer is often required in the care of patients with hemorrhagic stroke. Guidelines recommend a door-in-door-out (DIDO) time of ≤120 minutes at the transferring emergency department (ED); however, it is unknown whether DIDO times are related to clinical outcomes of hemorrhagic stroke.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational cohort study using US registry data from Get With The Guidelines-Stroke participating hospitals. Patients include those aged ≥18 years with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) who were transferred from the ED to a Get With The Guidelines participating receiving hospital from January 1, 2019, to July 31, 2022. The primary outcome was ordinal discharge modified Rankin scale (mRS) score and secondary outcomes included dichotomous discharge mRS, ability to ambulate independently at discharge, and inhospital mortality at the receiving hospital.

RESULTS

In all, 19,708 ICH and 7,757 patients with SAH were included. For patients with ICH, an increasing DIDO time was associated with greater odds of mRS 0 to 3 versus 4 to 6 at discharge in the unadjusted analyses (DIDO 91 to 180 minutes, odds ratio [OR] 1.15 [1.04 to 1.27]; DIDO 181 to 270 minutes, OR 1.51 [1.33, 1.71]; DIDO >270 minutes, OR 1.83 [1.58, 2.11]; versus DIDO ≤90 minutes). In the adjusted analyses, no associations were observed. Similar results were seen for mRS at discharge in patients with SAH. In both patients with ICH and SAH, longer DIDO times were associated with greater odds of independent ambulation at discharge and lower odds of inhospital mortality in the unadjusted analyses. After adjustment, the effect sizes of these associations were reduced, with some of the results based on quartiles becoming statistically nonsignificant.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that EDs currently expedite the transfer of the sickest patients; however, prospective studies and more granular data are needed to understand the impact of early treatment and timing of transfer for patients with hemorrhagic stroke.

摘要

研究目的

出血性中风患者的护理通常需要进行院间转运。指南建议转运急诊科(ED)的门到门(DIDO)时间≤120分钟;然而,DIDO时间是否与出血性中风的临床结局相关尚不清楚。

方法

采用来自参与“遵循卒中指南”(Get With The Guidelines-Stroke)项目的美国医院登记数据进行回顾性观察队列研究。患者包括2019年1月1日至2022年7月31日期间从急诊科转至参与“遵循卒中指南”项目的接收医院的年龄≥18岁的脑出血(ICH)或蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)患者。主要结局是出院时改良Rankin量表(mRS)的序数量表评分,次要结局包括出院时二分法mRS评分、出院时独立行走能力以及接收医院的住院死亡率。

结果

总共纳入了19708例ICH患者和7757例SAH患者。对于ICH患者,在未调整分析中,DIDO时间增加与出院时mRS评分为0至3而非4至6的更高几率相关(DIDO为91至180分钟,比值比[OR]为1.15[1.04至1.27];DIDO为181至270分钟,OR为1.51[1.33,1.71];DIDO>270分钟,OR为1.83[1.58,2.11];对比DIDO≤90分钟)。在调整分析中,未观察到关联。SAH患者出院时mRS评分也有类似结果。在未调整分析中,ICH和SAH患者中,更长的DIDO时间与出院时独立行走的更高几率以及住院死亡率的更低几率相关。调整后,这些关联的效应大小减小,一些基于四分位数的结果在统计学上变得不显著。

结论

这些发现表明,急诊科目前加快了病情最严重患者的转运;然而,需要前瞻性研究和更详细的数据来了解早期治疗和转运时机对出血性中风患者的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验