• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Door-in-Door-out Times for Interhospital Transfer of Patients With Stroke.门到门时间在卒中患者院内转运中的作用。
JAMA. 2023 Aug 15;330(7):636-649. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.12739.
2
Emergency Department Process Times and Door-In-Door-Out Times in Interhospital Transfers After Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中患者院间转运的急诊处理时间和门到门时间。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2431183. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.31183.
3
Hospital variation in thrombolysis times among patients with acute ischemic stroke: the contributions of door-to-imaging time and imaging-to-needle time.患者急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓时间的医院差异:从门到影像时间和影像到针时间的作用。
JAMA Neurol. 2014 Sep;71(9):1155-61. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.1528.
4
Emergency medical service hospital prenotification is associated with improved evaluation and treatment of acute ischemic stroke.紧急医疗服务医院预先通知与急性缺血性卒中评估及治疗的改善相关。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jul 1;5(4):514-22. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965210. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
5
Components and Trends in Door to Treatment Times for Endovascular Therapy in Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Hospitals.血管内治疗门到治疗时间的指南-卒中医院的组成和趋势。
Circulation. 2019 Jan 8;139(2):169-179. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036701.
6
Comparison of Clinical Care and In-Hospital Outcomes of Asian American and White Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.亚裔美国人和白人急性缺血性脑卒中患者的临床护理和住院结局比较。
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Apr 1;76(4):430-439. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4410.
7
Racial and ethnic differences in outcomes in older patients with acute ischemic stroke.老年急性缺血性卒中患者预后的种族和民族差异。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 May 1;6(3):284-92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000211. Epub 2013 May 16.
8
Trends in Interhospital Transfers and Mechanical Thrombectomy for United States Acute Ischemic Stroke Inpatients.美国急性缺血性中风住院患者的院间转运及机械取栓治疗趋势
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Apr;28(4):980-987. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.12.018. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
9
Association Between Thrombolytic Door-to-Needle Time and 1-Year Mortality and Readmission in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.溶栓治疗的门到针时间与急性缺血性脑卒中患者 1 年死亡率和再入院率的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2170-2184. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5697.
10
Association of door-in to door-out time with reperfusion delays and outcomes among patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.门到门时间与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者再灌注延迟和结局的关系。
JAMA. 2011 Jun 22;305(24):2540-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.862.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal Head-of-Bed Positioning Before Thrombectomy in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.大血管闭塞性卒中血栓切除术术前床头最佳体位:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Neurol. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.2253.
2
A Transfer Strategy Utilizing a Helicopter and a Ground Ambulance Together Does Not Prolong Door-In-Door-Out Times in Thrombectomy Patients: A Retrospective Analysis.直升机与地面救护车联合转运策略不会延长血栓切除术患者的门到门时间:一项回顾性分析
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Jun;32(6):e70148. doi: 10.1111/ene.70148.
3
Interfacility Transfer for Thrombectomy: A Promising Therapeutic Window.血栓切除术的机构间转运:一个有前景的治疗窗
Stroke. 2025 Feb;56(2):564-574. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049167. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
4
Interhospital transfer among US veterans admitted to community and veterans affairs hospitals for acute myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.2019冠状病毒病大流行之前及期间,美国退伍军人在社区医院和退伍军人事务医院因急性心肌梗死和缺血性中风住院后的院间转诊情况。
J Hosp Med. 2025 Feb;20(2):155-166. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13515. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
5
Emergency Department Process Times and Door-In-Door-Out Times in Interhospital Transfers After Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中患者院间转运的急诊处理时间和门到门时间。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2431183. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.31183.
6
ESR Bridges: imaging and treatment of cerebral ischaemia-a multidisciplinary view.红细胞沉降率桥接:脑缺血的影像学与治疗——多学科视角
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jan;35(1):1-3. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10891-5. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
7
Parallel activation of helicopter and ground transportation after dispatcher identification of suspected anterior large vessel occlusion stroke in rural areas: a proof-of-concept case with modeling from the LESTOR trial.在调度员识别出农村地区疑似前大血管闭塞性卒中后,直升机与地面转运并行:来自 LESTOR 试验的模型构建的验证性病例。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 6;32(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01233-x.
8
Impact and determinants of door in-door out time for stroke thrombectomy transfers in a large hub-and-spoke network.大型枢纽-辐条式网络中卒中血栓切除术转运的门进-门出时间的影响因素及决定因素
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Jun 14:15910199241261760. doi: 10.1177/15910199241261760.
9
Artificial intelligence to enhance prehospital stroke diagnosis and triage: a perspective.人工智能助力院前卒中诊断与分诊:一种观点
Front Neurol. 2024 May 2;15:1389056. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1389056. eCollection 2024.
10
Addressing Disparities in Acute Stroke Management and Prognosis.解决急性脑卒中管理和预后中的差异问题。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Apr 2;13(7):e031313. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031313. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal Trends in Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗的种族和民族差异的时间趋势。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Mar 15;11(6):e023212. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023212. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
2
Pathomechanisms and Treatment Implications for Stroke in COVID-19: A Review of the Literature.COVID-19 相关卒中的病理机制及治疗意义:文献综述
Life (Basel). 2022 Jan 29;12(2):207. doi: 10.3390/life12020207.
3
Racial Disparities in Endovascular Thrombectomy: It's More Than Just Access.血管内血栓切除术的种族差异:不仅仅是获得治疗的问题。
Stroke. 2022 Mar;53(3):864-866. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037921. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
4
Door-In-Door-Out Process Times at Primary Stroke Centers in Chicago.芝加哥初级卒中中心的“门到门”流程时间。
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Nov;78(5):674-681. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.06.018. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
5
National Trends in Transfer of Patients with Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage: An Analysis of 12-Year Nationwide Data.全国原发性脑出血患者转院趋势:12 年全国范围数据分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Dec;30(12):106116. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106116. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
6
Risk Assessment of the Door-In-Door-Out Process at Primary Stroke Centers for Patients With Acute Stroke Requiring Transfer to Comprehensive Stroke Centers.门到门流程在初级卒中中心的风险评估 急性卒中患者需要转至综合卒中中心。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Sep 21;10(18):e021803. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021803. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
7
Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in the Use and Outcomes of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.血管内血栓切除术治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的应用和结局存在种族和社会经济差异。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Sep;42(9):1576-1583. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7217. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
8
Changes in Stroke Hospital Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.COVID-19 大流行期间卒中医院治疗的变化:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2021 Nov;52(11):3651-3660. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034601. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
9
International Survey of Mechanical Thrombectomy Stroke Systems of Care During COVID-19 Pandemic.国际 COVID-19 大流行期间机械取栓卒中治疗系统调查。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Aug;30(8):105806. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105806. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
10
Stroke patients from rural areas have lower chances for long-term good clinical outcome after mechanical thrombectomy.来自农村地区的中风患者在接受机械取栓术后获得长期良好临床预后的机会较低。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Jul;206:106687. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106687. Epub 2021 May 15.

门到门时间在卒中患者院内转运中的作用。

Door-in-Door-out Times for Interhospital Transfer of Patients With Stroke.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

JAMA. 2023 Aug 15;330(7):636-649. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.12739.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2023.12739
PMID:37581671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10427946/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Treatments for time-sensitive acute stroke are not available at every hospital, often requiring interhospital transfer. Current guidelines recommend hospitals achieve a door-in-door-out time of no more than 120 minutes at the transferring emergency department (ED).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate door-in-door-out times for acute stroke transfers in the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry and to identify patient and hospital factors associated with door-in-door-out times.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: US registry-based, retrospective study of patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke from January 2019 through December 2021 who were transferred from the ED at registry-affiliated hospitals to other acute care hospitals.

EXPOSURE

Patient- and hospital-level characteristics.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the door-in-door-out time (time of transfer out minus time of arrival to the transferring ED) as a continuous variable and a categorical variable (≤120 minutes, >120 minutes). Generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression models were used to identify patient and hospital-level characteristics associated with door-in-door-out time overall and in subgroups of patients with hemorrhagic stroke, acute ischemic stroke eligible for endovascular therapy, and acute ischemic stroke transferred for reasons other than endovascular therapy.

RESULTS

Among 108 913 patients (mean [SD] age, 66.7 [15.2] years; 71.7% non-Hispanic White; 50.6% male) transferred from 1925 hospitals, 67 235 had acute ischemic stroke and 41 678 had hemorrhagic stroke. Overall, the median door-in-door-out time was 174 minutes (IQR, 116-276 minutes): 29 741 patients (27.3%) had a door-in-door-out time of 120 minutes or less. The factors significantly associated with longer median times were age 80 years or older (vs 18-59 years; 14.9 minutes, 95% CI, 12.3 to 17.5 minutes), female sex (5.2 minutes; 95% CI, 3.6 to 6.9 minutes), non-Hispanic Black vs non-Hispanic White (8.2 minutes, 95% CI, 5.7 to 10.8 minutes), and Hispanic ethnicity vs non-Hispanic White (5.4 minutes, 95% CI, 1.8 to 9.0 minutes). The following were significantly associated with shorter median door-in-door-out time: emergency medical services prenotification (-20.1 minutes; 95% CI, -22.1 to -18.1 minutes), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score exceeding 12 vs a score of 0 to 1 (-66.7 minutes; 95% CI, -68.7 to -64.7 minutes), and patients with acute ischemic stroke eligible for endovascular therapy vs the hemorrhagic stroke subgroup (-16.8 minutes; 95% CI, -21.0 to -12.7 minutes). Among patients with acute ischemic stroke eligible for endovascular therapy, female sex, Black race, and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with a significantly higher door-in-door-out time, whereas emergency medical services prenotification, intravenous thrombolysis, and a higher NIHSS score were associated with significantly lower door-in-door-out times.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this US registry-based study of interhospital transfer for acute stroke, the median door-in-door-out time was 174 minutes, which is longer than current recommendations for acute stroke transfer. Disparities and modifiable health system factors associated with longer door-in-door-out times are suitable targets for quality improvement initiatives.

摘要

重要性

并非每家医院都能提供治疗急性中风的时间敏感型治疗,往往需要医院间转移。目前的指南建议,在转诊急诊室(ED),门到门的时间不超过 120 分钟。

目的

评估美国心脏协会 Get With The Guidelines-Stroke 注册中心急性中风转院的门到门时间,并确定与门到门时间相关的患者和医院因素。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项基于美国注册中心的回顾性研究,研究对象为 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间从注册中心附属医院转至其他急性护理医院的缺血性或出血性中风患者。

暴露

患者和医院水平的特征。

主要结果和测量

主要结果是门到门时间(转移出时间减去到达转诊 ED 的时间)作为连续变量和分类变量(≤120 分钟,>120 分钟)。使用广义估计方程(GEE)回归模型来确定患者和医院水平的特征与门到门时间之间的总体关系以及出血性中风、急性缺血性中风适合血管内治疗和急性缺血性中风因血管内治疗以外的其他原因转院的亚组之间的关系。

结果

在从 1925 家医院转来的 108913 名患者(平均[SD]年龄,66.7[15.2]岁;71.7%非西班牙裔白人;50.6%男性)中,67235 名患者患有急性缺血性中风,41678 名患者患有出血性中风。总体而言,中位数门到门时间为 174 分钟(IQR,116-276 分钟):29741 名患者(27.3%)门到门时间为 120 分钟或更短。与中位数时间较长显著相关的因素包括年龄 80 岁或以上(与 18-59 岁相比;14.9 分钟,95%CI,12.3 至 17.5 分钟)、女性(5.2 分钟;95%CI,3.6 至 6.9 分钟)、非西班牙裔黑人与非西班牙裔白人(8.2 分钟,95%CI,5.7 至 10.8 分钟)和西班牙裔与非西班牙裔白人(5.4 分钟,95%CI,1.8 至 9.0 分钟)。与中位数门到门时间较短显著相关的因素包括:急诊医疗服务预先通知(-20.1 分钟;95%CI,-22.1 至-18.1 分钟)、国家卫生研究院中风量表(NIHSS)评分超过 12 分与评分 0 至 1 分(-66.7 分钟;95%CI,-68.7 至-64.7 分钟)和急性缺血性中风适合血管内治疗的患者与出血性中风亚组(-16.8 分钟;95%CI,-21.0 至-12.7 分钟)。在适合血管内治疗的急性缺血性中风患者中,女性、黑人种族和西班牙裔与门到门时间显著延长相关,而急诊医疗服务预先通知、静脉溶栓和更高的 NIHSS 评分与门到门时间显著缩短相关。

结论和相关性

在这项基于美国注册中心的急性中风医院间转移研究中,中位数门到门时间为 174 分钟,长于急性中风转移的当前推荐。与较长门到门时间相关的差异和可改变的卫生系统因素是质量改进计划的合适目标。