Certara Predictive Technologies Division, Certara UK, Level 2 Accro. 1 Concourse Way, Sheffield, S1 2BJ, UK.
Department of Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology, UCB, Slough, UK.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2024 Nov;63(11):1561-1572. doi: 10.1007/s40262-024-01432-w. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
Different empirical lactation models have been published to predict the milk-to-plasma (M/P) ratio of drugs to gain knowledge on the extent of drug distribution to the breastmilk. M/P ratios will likely vary across the lactation period due to differences in physiological milk pH and fat content, which are not routinely reported in clinical lactation pharmacokinetic studies. This work aims to evaluate the sensitivity of two (a theory-based phase distribution and a log-transformed regression) lactation models for M/P prediction at different physiological milk pH and fat content.
A literature search was conducted to collate reported M/P ratios for different drugs and their physicochemical parameters required for the prediction of the M/P ratio. Two distribution models were used for M/P ratio predictions. The M/P ratio of drugs was predicted under the physiological milk pHs of 6.8, 7.0, 7.2, and 7.4 and at of 1%, 3%, and 6% fat content. Calculated M/P ratios were compared with the observed M/P ratios.
A total of 200 M/P ratios for 130 compounds (40 acids and 90 bases) were collected from clinical studies and included in the analysis. For both model, precision decreases and bias increases outside the milk pH range 7.0-7.2 and fat contents more than 3%. Significant variability exists in the observed M/P ratios. Both milk pH and fat content are important parameters for model prediction.
Calculated M/P ratios are influenced by multiple covariates, including milk pH and fat content. The phase distribution model is less sensitive to these covariates than the log-transformed model, especially for acidic compounds. For complex matrices such as breastmilk, the actual physiological parameters of the sampled milk, at least milk fat and pH, and their distributions are required covariates to improve the prediction outcomes, design lactation pharmacokinetic studies, and inform the potential breastfed infant dose.
已发表了不同的经验性泌乳模型来预测药物的奶-血浆(M/P)比值,以了解药物在母乳中分布的程度。由于生理乳汁 pH 值和脂肪含量的差异,M/P 比值可能在泌乳期发生变化,但这些差异在临床泌乳药代动力学研究中通常未报告。本研究旨在评估两种(基于理论的相分布和对数转换回归)泌乳模型在不同生理乳汁 pH 值和脂肪含量下预测 M/P 的敏感性。
通过文献检索,收集了不同药物的报告 M/P 比值及其预测 M/P 比值所需的物理化学参数。使用两种分布模型预测 M/P 比值。在生理乳汁 pH 值为 6.8、7.0、7.2 和 7.4 以及脂肪含量为 1%、3%和 6%的情况下预测药物的 M/P 比值。将计算的 M/P 比值与观察到的 M/P 比值进行比较。
共从临床研究中收集了 200 个 M/P 比值用于 130 种化合物(40 种酸和 90 种碱)的分析。对于两种模型,在 pH 值范围为 7.0-7.2 以外和脂肪含量超过 3%时,精度降低,偏差增加。观察到的 M/P 比值存在显著差异。乳汁 pH 值和脂肪含量均是模型预测的重要参数。
计算的 M/P 比值受多个协变量的影响,包括乳汁 pH 值和脂肪含量。与对数转换模型相比,相分布模型对这些协变量的敏感性较低,尤其是对于酸性化合物。对于母乳等复杂基质,需要采样乳汁的实际生理参数(至少包括乳脂和 pH 值)及其分布作为协变量,以改善预测结果、设计泌乳药代动力学研究并为潜在的母乳喂养婴儿剂量提供信息。