Kosteljanetz M
Neurosurgery. 1986 Jan;18(1):17-24. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198601000-00004.
The main purposes of this study were to evaluate pressure-volume relations and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics in patients with head injury and to evaluate the pressure-volume index (PVI) in that context. Sixteen head-injured patients underwent continuous intracranial (intraventricular) pressure (ICP) monitoring, studies of the PVI and the width of the pulse amplitude, and studies of CSF dynamics determined by the PVI technique or controlled withdrawal and expressed as resistance to the outflow of CSF (Rout). In this study, the PVI technique proved safe and relatively simple. The PVI based on bolus injections was significantly greater than the PVI based on CSF withdrawal. The PVI varied independently of clinical course, outcome, and ICP. The ICP pulse amplitude increased linearly with the ICP. It was not possible to establish any clinically useful correlation between pulsatile ICP changes and intracranial compliance (PVI). There was a linear correlation between ICP and Rout.
本研究的主要目的是评估头部受伤患者的压力-容积关系及脑脊液(CSF)动力学,并在此背景下评估压力-容积指数(PVI)。16例头部受伤患者接受了连续的颅内(脑室内)压力(ICP)监测、PVI及脉搏波幅宽度研究,以及通过PVI技术或控制性引流测定的CSF动力学研究,并将其表示为CSF流出阻力(Rout)。在本研究中,PVI技术被证明是安全且相对简单的。基于推注的PVI显著大于基于CSF引流的PVI。PVI独立于临床病程、结局及ICP而变化。ICP脉搏波幅随ICP呈线性增加。搏动性ICP变化与颅内顺应性(PVI)之间无法建立任何临床上有用的相关性。ICP与Rout之间存在线性相关性。