• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“拓宽视角活动”改善 LGBTQ+学生的体验和宗教学生的内容理解。

"Broadening Perspectives Activities" Improve LGBTQ+ Student Experiences and Religious Students' Content Comprehension.

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0088.

School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-4601.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Dec;23(4):ar49. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-02-0052.

DOI:10.1187/cbe.24-02-0052
PMID:39453811
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11659847/
Abstract

Curricular content in undergraduate biology courses has been historically hetero and cisnormative due to various cultural stigmas, biases, and discrimination. Such curricula may be partially responsible for why LGBTQ+ students in STEM are less likely to complete their degrees than their non-LGBTQ+ counterparts. We developed Broadening Perspective Activities (BPAs) to expand the representation of marginalized perspectives in the curriculum of an online, upper-division, undergraduate animal behavior course, focusing on topics relating to sex, gender, and sexuality. We used a quasiexperimental design to assess the impact of the BPAs on student perceptions of course concepts and on their sense of belonging in biology. We found that LGBTQ+ students entered the course with a better understanding of many animal behavior concepts that are influenced by cultural biases associated with sex, gender, and sexuality. However, LGBTQ+ students who took the course with the BPAs demonstrated a greater sense of belonging in biology at the end of the term compared with LGBTQ+ students in the course without BPAs. We also show that religious students demonstrated improved comprehension of many concepts related to sex, gender, and sexuality after taking the course with BPAs, with no negative impacts on their sense of belonging.

摘要

由于各种文化上的污名、偏见和歧视,本科生物学课程的课程内容在历史上一直是异性恋和性别规范的。这样的课程可能部分解释了为什么 LGBTQ+ 的 STEM 学生比非 LGBTQ+ 的学生更不可能完成学位。我们开发了拓宽视角活动(BPAs),以扩大在线、高年级本科动物行为课程课程中边缘化观点的代表性,重点关注与性、性别和性取向有关的主题。我们使用准实验设计来评估 BPAs 对学生对课程概念的理解以及他们对生物学归属感的影响。我们发现,LGBTQ+ 学生在进入课程时对许多受与性、性别和性取向相关的文化偏见影响的动物行为概念有了更好的理解。然而,与没有 BPAs 的课程相比,参加有 BPAs 的课程的 LGBTQ+ 学生在学期末对生物学的归属感更强。我们还表明,宗教学生在参加 BPAs 课程后,对许多与性、性别和性取向相关的概念的理解有所提高,而他们的归属感没有受到负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d8/11659847/59be633e85c9/cbe-23-ar49-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d8/11659847/3648b2343665/cbe-23-ar49-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d8/11659847/a555b2ec8430/cbe-23-ar49-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d8/11659847/59be633e85c9/cbe-23-ar49-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d8/11659847/3648b2343665/cbe-23-ar49-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d8/11659847/a555b2ec8430/cbe-23-ar49-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d8/11659847/59be633e85c9/cbe-23-ar49-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
"Broadening Perspectives Activities" Improve LGBTQ+ Student Experiences and Religious Students' Content Comprehension.“拓宽视角活动”改善 LGBTQ+学生的体验和宗教学生的内容理解。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Dec;23(4):ar49. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-02-0052.
2
Integrating lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) competency into the dental school curriculum.将女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿(LGBTQ)能力融入牙科学院课程。
J Dent Educ. 2024 Jun;88(6):823-831. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13476. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
3
LGBTQ+ health education for medical students in the United States: a narrative literature review.美国医学生的 LGBTQ+健康教育:叙事文献综述。
Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2312716. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2312716. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
4
Comparison of faculty and student perceptions of sexual and gender minority content in a preclerkship medical curriculum.比较预科医学课程中教职员和学生对性少数群体和性别少数群体内容的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Dec 19;23(1):973. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04925-7.
5
Early Intervention for LGBTQ Health: A 10-Hour Curriculum for Preclinical Health Professions Students.LGBTQ健康的早期干预:针对临床前健康专业学生的10小时课程。
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Jan 7;17:11072. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11072.
6
LGBTQ+ Science Students' Experiences, Perceptions, and Feelings of Discrimination in Their Science Departments.LGBTQ+ 科学专业学生在其所在科学部门的经历、看法和歧视感受。
J Homosex. 2024 Sep 18;71(11):2638-2663. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2023.2252964. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
7
Experiences of Judeo-Christian Students in Undergraduate Biology.犹太教-基督教学生的本科生物学体验。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Spring;16(1). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-04-0153.
8
LGBTQ+ faculty, queering health sciences classrooms: student perspectives.LGBTQ+ 教师,使健康科学课堂多样化:学生视角。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2024 Jun 1;48(2):270-278. doi: 10.1152/advan.00200.2023. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
9
Medical Student Perspectives on Sexual and Gender Minority Acceptance in Surgical Specialties and Sexual and Gender Minority Education.医学生对手术专业中性少数群体和性别少数群体的接受程度以及性少数群体和性别少数群体教育的看法。
J Surg Res. 2023 Sep;289:121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.03.027. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
10
Evaluation of LGBTQ+ Health Education in the Preclinical Curriculum at a Public Midwest Medical School.对美国中西部一所公立医学院临床前课程中LGBTQ+健康教育的评估。
WMJ. 2025;124(1):35-41.

本文引用的文献

1
Scientist Spotlights in Secondary Schools: Student Shifts in Multiple Measures Related to Science Identity after Receiving Written Assignments.中学校园里的科学家:学生在收到书面作业后,在与科学身份相关的多个方面发生转变。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Jun;22(2):ar22. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-07-0149.
2
"It's completely erasure": A Qualitative Exploration of Experiences of Transgender, Nonbinary, Gender Nonconforming, and Questioning Students in Biology Courses.“这完全是抹杀”:对生物课程中跨性别、非二元性别、性别不一致和性别存疑学生经历的定性探索。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Dec;21(4):ar69. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-12-0343.
3
Factors Influencing Faculty Decisions to Teach LGBTQ Content in Undergraduate Nursing Programs.
影响教师在本科护理课程中教授 LGBTQ 内容的决定的因素。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2022;43(4):228-232. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000955. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
4
Six Principles for Embracing Gender and Sexual Diversity in Postsecondary Biology Classrooms.高等生物课堂中接纳性别与性取向多样性的六项原则。
Bioscience. 2022 Mar 16;72(5):481-492. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biac013. eCollection 2022 May.
5
Unveiling Concealable Stigmatized Identities in Class: The Impact of an Instructor Revealing Her LGBTQ+ Identity to Students in a Large-Enrollment Biology Course.揭示课堂上可隐藏的污名化身份:在一门大型生物学课程中,教师向学生揭示其 LGBTQ+ 身份的影响。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Jun;21(2):ar37. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-06-0162.
6
Religious-based negative attitudes towards LGBTQ people among healthcare, social care and social work students and professionals: A review of the international literature.宗教对医疗保健、社会关怀和社会工作学生及专业人员中 LGBTQ 人群的负面态度:国际文献综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e1449-e1470. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13812. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
7
Factors Influencing Retention of Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Students in Undergraduate STEM Majors.影响本科 STEM 专业跨性别和性别不符合学生保留率的因素。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Mar;21(1):ar13. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-05-0136.
8
Don't Be Too Political: Depoliticization, Sexual Orientation, and Undergraduate STEM Major Persistence.不要太政治化:去政治化、性取向与本科 STEM 专业坚持度。
J Homosex. 2023 Mar 21;70(4):632-659. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2021.1996101. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
9
The stench of bathroom bills and anti-transgender legislation: Anxiety and depression among transgender, nonbinary, and cisgender LGBQ people during a state referendum.厕所法案和反跨性别立法的恶臭:州公投期间跨性别、非二元性别和顺性别 LGBQ 人群的焦虑和抑郁。
J Couns Psychol. 2022 Jan;69(1):1-13. doi: 10.1037/cou0000558. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
10
Systemic inequalities for LGBTQ professionals in STEM.STEM领域中LGBTQ专业人士面临的系统性不平等。
Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 15;7(3). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe0933. Print 2021 Jan.