Suppr超能文献

STEM领域中LGBTQ专业人士面临的系统性不平等。

Systemic inequalities for LGBTQ professionals in STEM.

作者信息

Cech E A, Waidzunas T J

机构信息

Department of Sociology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Department of Sociology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 15;7(3). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe0933. Print 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Researchers have documented race and gender inequality in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) for decades. Do lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) professionals face parallel experiences of disadvantage in STEM? Using representative survey data from 21 STEM professional societies ( = 25,324; = 1006), this paper presents multidimensional and methodologically robust documentation of 5 dimensions of LGBTQ inequality in STEM. Controlling for variation by demographic, discipline, and job factors, LGBTQ STEM professionals were more likely to experience career limitations, harassment, and professional devaluation than their non-LGBTQ peers. They also reported more frequent health difficulties and were more likely to intend to leave STEM. These trends were similar across STEM disciplines and employment sectors. We found no differences by LGBTQ status in education level, work effort, or job commitment. These findings reveal LGBTQ status as a clear axis of inequality in STEM and motivate further research into the mechanisms producing such outcomes.

摘要

几十年来,研究人员一直在记录科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域存在的种族和性别不平等现象。女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者和酷儿(LGBTQ)专业人士在STEM领域是否也面临类似的劣势经历呢?本文利用来自21个STEM专业协会的代表性调查数据(n = 25324;m = 1006),对LGBTQ在STEM领域不平等的五个维度进行了多维度且方法稳健的记录。在控制了人口统计学、学科和工作因素的差异后,LGBTQ STEM专业人士比非LGBTQ同行更有可能经历职业限制、骚扰和职业贬值。他们还报告说健康问题更频繁,并且更有可能打算离开STEM领域。这些趋势在STEM各学科和就业部门中相似。我们发现LGBTQ身份在教育水平、工作努力程度或工作投入方面没有差异。这些发现揭示了LGBTQ身份是STEM领域不平等的一个明显轴心,并促使人们进一步研究产生这些结果的机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03a2/7810386/acb2378e9bd8/abe0933-F1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验