Jung Suh Woo, Lee Inhyeok, Lee InYeong, Kim Jeong Woo, Alromi Ahmad, Seo Won Jun, Park Shin-Hoo, Kwon Yeongkeun, Jang You Jin, Lee Chang Min, Kim Jong-Han, Park Joong-Min, Park Sungsoo
Department of Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul.
Division of Foregut Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):7919-7928. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002124.
Even in the absence of definite evidence of pathological acid reflux, antireflux surgery (ARS) can still effectively improve gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Nonetheless, predicting postoperative reflux symptom improvement has been primarily dependent on acid-based parameters. No objective index reflecting both acid and nonacid reflux was identified to select ARS candidates.
Prospectively collected data of 121 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), who underwent laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication from two institutions, were retrospectively reviewed. The patients reported preoperative and postoperative GERD symptoms using the Korean version of the GERD questionnaire, along with the gastroesophageal reflux disease-health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL). The patients were assessed for reflux symptoms using bolus exposure, acid exposure time (AET), and DeMeester score (DMS) as measurements were selected. For each reflux parameter, its association, correlation, and predictive capacity of the degree of postoperative symptom resolution were analyzed using χ2 tests, point-biserial correlations, logistic regression analyses, and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.
Seventy-two patients were eligible for this study. Bolus exposure was superior to the other parameters in terms of the degree of association and correlation with a resolution of typical symptoms. Bolus exposure also showed a higher diagnostic accuracy in predicting the resolution of epigastric pain (area under the curve [AUC]=0.723, P =0.013) and regurgitation (AUC=0.981, P <0.001). Secondary analyses were performed in patients without pathological reflux, defined as the DMS-negative (DMS <14.7) or AET-negative (AET <6%) groups. In the secondary analyses, bolus exposure showed considerable diagnostic accuracy with statistical significance for all typical symptoms in both the DMS-negative (heartburn: AUC=0.717, P =0.025; epigastric pain: AUC=0.717, P =0.025; regurgitation: AUC=0.975, P <0.001) and AET-negative (heartburn: AUC=0.681, P =0.045; epigastric pain: AUC=0.749, P =0.009; regurgitation: AUC=0.975, P <0.001) groups.
Bolus exposure, a parameter of total reflux, was superior to AET or DMS in defining candidates for ARS. Further studies investigating the surgical indications for ARS in patients with nonacid reflux using bolus exposure are required.
即使在没有明确病理性酸反流证据的情况下,抗反流手术(ARS)仍可有效改善胃食管反流症状。尽管如此,预测术后反流症状改善主要依赖于基于酸的参数。尚未发现反映酸反流和非酸反流的客观指标来选择ARS候选者。
回顾性分析前瞻性收集的来自两个机构的121例接受腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术的胃食管反流病(GERD)患者的数据。患者使用韩国版GERD问卷以及胃食管反流病-健康相关生活质量(GERD-HRQL)报告术前和术后的GERD症状。通过选择推注暴露、酸暴露时间(AET)和DeMeester评分(DMS)来评估患者的反流症状。对于每个反流参数,使用χ2检验、点二列相关、逻辑回归分析和受试者工作特征曲线分析来分析其与术后症状缓解程度的关联、相关性和预测能力。
72例患者符合本研究条件。在与典型症状缓解的关联程度和相关性方面,推注暴露优于其他参数。推注暴露在预测上腹部疼痛缓解(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.723,P =0.013)和反流(AUC=0.981,P <0.001)方面也显示出更高的诊断准确性。对定义为DMS阴性(DMS <14.7)或AET阴性(AET <6%)组的无病理性反流患者进行了二次分析。在二次分析中,推注暴露在DMS阴性组(烧心:AUC=0.717,P =0.025;上腹部疼痛:AUC=0.717,P =0.025;反流:AUC=0.975,P <0.001)和AET阴性组(烧心:AUC=0.681,P =0.045;上腹部疼痛:AUC=0.749,P =0.009;反流:AUC=0.975,P <0.001)中对所有典型症状均显示出具有统计学意义的相当高的诊断准确性。
推注暴露作为总反流的一个参数,在定义ARS候选者方面优于AET或DMS。需要进一步研究使用推注暴露来确定非酸反流患者ARS的手术指征。