Ruderman Stephanie A, Hunt Peter W, Beck-Engeser Gabriele, Ambayec Gabrielle, Willig Amanda L, Saag Michael S, Napravnik Sonia, Cachay Edward, Bamford Laura, Landay Alan, Drumright Lydia N, Mixson L Sarah, Whitney Bridget M, Nance Robin M, Kitahata Mari M, Crane Heidi M, Delaney Joseph A C, Hahn Andrew W
Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
AIDS. 2025 Feb 1;39(2):153-161. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000004047. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
Frailty occurs at higher rates and younger ages among people with HIV (PWH) compared with the general population and is often attributed to chronic inflammation and subsequent immune exhaustion. We assessed how inflammatory biomarkers are associated with frailty among PWH.
The Centers for AIDS Research (CFAR) Network of Integrated Clinical Systems (CNICS) cohort is comprised of adult PWH in care at 10 sites, and harmonizes demographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data. A panel of 13 inflammatory biomarkers was collected from a subset of virally suppressed PWH once per person between 2010 and 2018. Frailty was measured with a validated PRO phenotype, scored 0-4, from biomarker collection date through July 2022. With adjusted linear mixed models, we estimated longitudinal associations between standard deviation-scaled log 2 -transformed biomarkers and frailty score.
Among 273 PWH, most were men (91%), average age at baseline was 45, 42% were non-Hispanic White whereas 35% were non-Hispanic Black, and average follow-up time was 5.5 years. Several biomarkers were associated with higher frailty, including those linked to microbial translocation (sCD14, LBP, KT ratio) and systemic inflammation (CRP, IL-6, suPAR, sTNFR1, sTNFR2). Higher IL-6 was associated with a 0.25-point higher frailty score [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.39]. Higher sTNFR1 [0.35 (0.13-0.56)], sCD14 [0.21 (0.11-0.31)], and suPAR [0.24 (0.11-0.36)] levels were also associated with higher frailty scores over follow-up.
Higher levels of biomarkers linked to microbial translocation and systemic inflammation are associated with higher average frailty scores over time in a cohort of virally suppressed PWH, highlighting these pathways as potential interventional targets for mitigating frailty in PWH.
与普通人群相比,艾滋病毒感染者(PWH)中虚弱的发生率更高且发病年龄更小,这通常归因于慢性炎症及随后的免疫耗竭。我们评估了炎症生物标志物与PWH中虚弱的关联。
艾滋病研究中心(CFAR)综合临床系统网络(CNICS)队列由在10个地点接受治疗的成年PWH组成,并整合了人口统计学、临床和患者报告结局(PRO)数据。2010年至2018年间,从病毒得到抑制的PWH亚组中每人采集一次包含13种炎症生物标志物的样本。从生物标志物采集日期至2022年7月,使用经过验证的PRO表型测量虚弱程度,评分范围为0至4分。通过调整后的线性混合模型,我们估计了标准差标准化的log2转换生物标志物与虚弱评分之间的纵向关联。
在273名PWH中,大多数为男性(91%),基线平均年龄为45岁,42%为非西班牙裔白人,35%为非西班牙裔黑人,平均随访时间为5.5年。几种生物标志物与较高的虚弱程度相关,包括与微生物易位相关的标志物(可溶性CD14、脂多糖结合蛋白、KT比值)和全身炎症相关的标志物(C反应蛋白、白细胞介素-6、可溶性尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体、可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体1、可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体2)。白细胞介素-6水平较高与虚弱评分高出0.25分相关[95%置信区间(CI)为0.12 - 0.39]。在随访期间,可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体1水平较高[0.35(0.13 - 0.56)]、可溶性CD14水平较高[0.21(0.11 - 0.31)]和可溶性尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体水平较高[0.24(0.11 - 0.36)]也与较高的虚弱评分相关。
在病毒得到抑制的PWH队列中,与微生物易位和全身炎症相关的生物标志物水平较高与随时间推移更高的平均虚弱评分相关,突出了这些途径作为减轻PWH虚弱的潜在干预靶点。