Suppr超能文献

关于提高非专业人士识别可靠数字健康信息能力的干预措施的综合系统评价。

An integrative systematic review on interventions to improve layperson's ability to identify trustworthy digital health information.

作者信息

Mohamed Hind, Kittle Esme, Nour Nehal, Hamed Ruba, Feeney Kaylem, Salsberg Jon, Kelly Dervla

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Co. Limerick, Ireland.

Health Research Institute, University of limerick, Co. Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Oct 25;3(10):e0000638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000638. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Health information on the Internet has a ubiquitous influence on health consumers' behaviour. Searching and evaluating online health information poses a real challenge for many health consumers. To our knowledge, our systematic review paper is the first to explore the interventions targeting lay people to improve their e-health literacy skills. Our paper aims to explore interventions to improve laypeople ability to identify trustworthy online health information. The search was conducted on Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane database, Academic Search Complete, and APA psych info. Publications were selected by screening title, abstract, and full text, then manual review of reference lists of selected publications. Data was extracted from eligible studies on an excel sheet about the types of interventions, the outcomes of the interventions and whether they are effective, and the barriers and facilitators for using the interventions by consumers. A mixed-methods appraisal tool was used to appraise evidence from quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies. Whittemore and Knafl's integrative review approach was used as a guidance for narrative synthesis. The total number of included studies is twelve. Media literacy interventions are the most common type of interventions. Few studies measured the effect of the interventions on patient health outcomes. All the procedural and navigation/ evaluation skills-building interventions are significantly effective. Computer/internet illiteracy and the absence of guidance/facilitators are significant barriers to web-based intervention use. Few interventions are distinguished by its implementation in a context tailored to consumers, using a human-centred design approach, and delivery through multiple health stakeholders' partnership. There is potential for further research to understand how to improve consumers health information use focusing on collaborative learning, using human-centred approaches, and addressing the social determinants of health.

摘要

互联网上的健康信息对健康消费者的行为有着普遍影响。搜索和评估在线健康信息对许多健康消费者来说是一项真正的挑战。据我们所知,我们的系统综述论文是第一篇探索针对普通大众提高其电子健康素养技能的干预措施的论文。我们的论文旨在探索提高普通大众识别可靠在线健康信息能力的干预措施。我们在Ovid Medline、Embase、Cochrane数据库、Academic Search Complete和APA psych info上进行了搜索。通过筛选标题、摘要和全文来选择出版物,然后人工查阅所选出版物的参考文献列表。从符合条件的研究中提取关于干预类型、干预结果及其是否有效以及消费者使用干预措施的障碍和促进因素的数据,并记录在电子表格中。我们使用了一种混合方法评估工具来评估来自定量、定性和混合方法研究的证据。以Whittemore和Knafl的综合综述方法为指导进行叙述性综合。纳入研究的总数为12项。媒体素养干预是最常见的干预类型。很少有研究测量干预措施对患者健康结果的影响。所有程序和导航/评估技能培养干预措施都具有显著效果。计算机/互联网知识匮乏以及缺乏指导/促进者是基于网络的干预措施使用的重大障碍。很少有干预措施的特点是在针对消费者的背景下实施,采用以人为本的设计方法,并通过多个健康利益相关者的合作来提供。进一步研究以了解如何通过采用以人为本的方法、关注协作学习以及解决健康的社会决定因素来改善消费者的健康信息使用,具有很大潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d6e/11508166/da05763a1b02/pdig.0000638.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验