• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针刺治疗脑卒中后失语症的随机对照试验(RCT)质量如何?报告质量评估。

How is the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for acupuncture treatment of post-stroke aphasia? A report quality assessment.

机构信息

National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Oct 25;19(10):e0308704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308704. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0308704
PMID:39453955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11508150/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have reported the use of acupuncture for the treatment of post-stroke aphasia (PSA).

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang data Information Site, and China Science and Technology Journal Database from January 2013 to June 2023. RCTs utilizing acupuncture as an intervention for the treatment of post-stroke aphasia were included in this study. The overall quality score (OQS) of RCTs was independently evaluated by two researchers using the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and the Standards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA) guidelines, with the agreement between researchers calculated using Cohen's kappa statistics.

RESULTS

In conclusion, we included 38 RCTs in this study. The median OQS of the 38 RCTs was 13 (minimum 8, maximum 20) based on the CONSORT statement. Out of all CONSORT items, 10 (27%) had a positive rate of greater than 80%, while 17 (46%) had a positive rate of less than 10%. The median OQS of the 38 RCTs was 12 (minimum 6, maximum 14) based on the STRICTA guideline. Within the STRICTA guideline, 6 items (35%) had a positive rate of greater than 80%, and 3 items (18%) had a positive rate of less than 10%. Most items based on the CONSORT and STRICTA guidelines were observed to have a perfect or good degree of agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall reporting quality of RCTs for acupuncture treatment of PSA was found to be suboptimal. Notably, the reporting quality of the STRICTA guideline is higher compared to the CONSORT statement. Therefore, strict adherence to both the CONSORT and STRICTA statements is recommended to enhance the quality of RCT reports on acupuncture treatment for post-stroke aphasia.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估报告使用针刺治疗中风后失语症(PSA)的随机对照试验(RCT)的质量。

方法

我们系统地检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)、万方数据知识服务平台和中国科技期刊数据库,检索时间从 2013 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月。纳入使用针刺作为干预措施治疗中风后失语症的 RCT。使用 CONSORT 和 STRICTA 指南,由两名研究人员独立评估 RCT 的总体质量评分(OQS),使用 Cohen's kappa 统计计算研究人员之间的一致性。

结果

本研究共纳入 38 项 RCT。基于 CONSORT 声明,38 项 RCT 的中位数 OQS 为 13(最低 8,最高 20)。在所有 CONSORT 项目中,有 10 个(27%)的阳性率大于 80%,而有 17 个(46%)的阳性率小于 10%。基于 STRICTA 指南,38 项 RCT 的中位数 OQS 为 12(最低 6,最高 14)。在 STRICTA 指南中,有 6 个项目(35%)的阳性率大于 80%,有 3 个项目(18%)的阳性率小于 10%。基于 CONSORT 和 STRICTA 指南的大多数项目观察到具有完美或良好的一致性程度。

结论

针刺治疗 PSA 的 RCT 报告的总体质量较差。值得注意的是,STRICTA 指南的报告质量高于 CONSORT 声明。因此,建议严格遵守 CONSORT 和 STRICTA 声明,以提高针刺治疗中风后失语症 RCT 的报告质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f7a/11508150/2639e7e41f87/pone.0308704.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f7a/11508150/c3fa2ba2a8de/pone.0308704.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f7a/11508150/80e5aaa2861a/pone.0308704.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f7a/11508150/2639e7e41f87/pone.0308704.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f7a/11508150/c3fa2ba2a8de/pone.0308704.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f7a/11508150/80e5aaa2861a/pone.0308704.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f7a/11508150/2639e7e41f87/pone.0308704.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
How is the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for acupuncture treatment of post-stroke aphasia? A report quality assessment.针刺治疗脑卒中后失语症的随机对照试验(RCT)质量如何?报告质量评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 25;19(10):e0308704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308704. eCollection 2024.
2
Assessing the quality of reports about randomized controlled trials of scalp acupuncture combined with another treatment for stroke.评估头皮针联合其他疗法治疗中风的随机对照试验报告的质量。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017 Sep 6;17(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-1950-6.
3
Assessing the quality of reports about randomized controlled trials of scalp acupuncture treatment for vascular dementia.评估头针治疗血管性痴呆随机对照试验报告的质量。
Trials. 2017 May 2;18(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1945-0.
4
Assessment of reporting quality in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture for post-stroke rehabilitation using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines.使用CONSORT声明和STRICTA指南评估针刺治疗中风后康复的随机对照试验的报告质量。
Acupunct Med. 2017 Apr;35(2):100-106. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2016-011062. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
5
[Evaluation of the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for depression based on CONSORT statement, STRICTA criteria and SHARE checklist].基于CONSORT声明、STRICTA标准和SHARE清单对针刺治疗抑郁症随机对照试验报告质量的评价
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2024 Aug 12;44(8):966-74. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20240110-k0003.
6
Evaluating the Quality of Reports About Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture for Low Back Pain.评估关于针灸治疗腰痛的随机对照试验报告的质量。
J Pain Res. 2021 Apr 21;14:1141-1151. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S308006. eCollection 2021.
7
Assessment of the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture in the Korean literature using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines.使用CONSORT声明和STRICTA指南评估韩国文献中针灸随机对照试验的报告质量。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 29;4(7):e005068. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005068.
8
Assessing the reporting quality in randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for postherpetic neuralgia using the CONSORT statement and STRICTA guidelines.使用CONSORT声明和STRICTA指南评估针灸治疗带状疱疹后神经痛随机对照试验的报告质量。
J Pain Res. 2019 Jul 29;12:2359-2370. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S210471. eCollection 2019.
9
[Evaluation of the report quality of Chinese and English randomized controlled trials of acupuncture based on CONSORT statement and STRICTA checklist].[基于CONSORT声明和STRICTA清单对针刺中英文随机对照试验报告质量的评价]
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2023 Mar 12;43(3):355-61. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20220328-k0005.
10
[Reporting quality of RCTs of acupuncture for vascular dementia].[针灸治疗血管性痴呆随机对照试验的报告质量]
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2020 Aug 12;40(8):902-6. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20190620-k0003.

本文引用的文献

1
[Evaluation of the report quality of Chinese and English randomized controlled trials of acupuncture based on CONSORT statement and STRICTA checklist].[基于CONSORT声明和STRICTA清单对针刺中英文随机对照试验报告质量的评价]
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2023 Mar 12;43(3):355-61. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20220328-k0005.
2
How about the RCTs' quality of acupuncture treatment for female urinary incontinence in recent 20 years? A report quality assessment.近20年针灸治疗女性尿失禁的随机对照试验质量如何?一项报告质量评估。
World J Urol. 2023 Jan;41(1):197-204. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04213-x. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
3
Assessment of Reporting Quality in Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture for Primary Insomnia with CONSORT Statement and STRICTA Guidelines.
使用CONSORT声明和STRICTA指南评估针刺治疗原发性失眠随机对照试验的报告质量
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Feb 17;2022:5157870. doi: 10.1155/2022/5157870. eCollection 2022.
4
A New Approach to Assess Blinding for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Patients with Fibromyalgia. A Randomized Clinical Trial.一种评估纤维肌痛患者经颅直流电刺激治疗盲法的新方法。一项随机临床试验。
Brain Sci. 2021 Oct 11;11(10):1335. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11101335.
5
Current Approaches to the Treatment of Post-Stroke Aphasia.中风后失语症的当前治疗方法。
J Stroke. 2021 May;23(2):183-201. doi: 10.5853/jos.2020.05015. Epub 2021 May 31.
6
Evaluating the Quality of Reports About Randomized Controlled Trials of Acupuncture for Low Back Pain.评估关于针灸治疗腰痛的随机对照试验报告的质量。
J Pain Res. 2021 Apr 21;14:1141-1151. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S308006. eCollection 2021.
7
Efficacy of Intensive Acupuncture Versus Sham Acupuncture in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.密集型针刺与假针刺治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Mar;73(3):448-458. doi: 10.1002/art.41584. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
8
[Acupuncture technique of combined with speech rehabilitation training for post-stroke motor aphasia].针刺结合言语康复训练治疗脑卒中后运动性失语的技术
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2020 Oct 12;40(10):1037-41. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20190811-k0002.
9
Randomized Controlled Trials.随机对照试验。
Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1S):S79-S87. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.013.
10
Sample Size Estimation in Clinical Research: From Randomized Controlled Trials to Observational Studies.临床研究中的样本量估计:从随机对照试验到观察性研究
Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1S):S12-S20. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.010.