Vecsey-Nagy Milan, Tremamunno Giuseppe, Schoepf U Joseph, Gnasso Chiara, Zsarnóczay Emese, Fink Nicola, Kravchenko Dmitrij, Taha Hagar Muhammad, Halfmann Moritz C, Jokkel Zsófia, O'Doherty Jim, Szilveszter Bálint, Maurovich-Horvat Pál, Spruill Suranyi Pal, Varga-Szemes Akos, Emrich Tilman
Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425, United States; Heart and Vascular Centre, Semmelweis University, 68 Varosmajor Street, Budapest 1122, Hungary.
Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425, United States; Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, 1035-1039 Via di Grottarossa, Rome 00189, Italy.
Eur J Radiol. 2024 Dec;181:111797. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111797. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
To evaluate the feasibility of CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) calculations on ultrahigh-resolution (UHR) photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT series and to intra-individually compare the results with energy-integrating (EID)-CT measurements.
Prospective patients with calcified plaques detected on EID-CT between April 1st, 2023 and January 31st, 2024 were recruited for a UHR CCTA on PCD-CT within 30 days. PCD-CT was performed using the same or a lower CT dose index and an equivalent volume of contrast media. An on-site machine learning algorithm was used to obtain CT-FFR values on a per-vessel and per-patient basis. For all analyses, CT-FFR values ≤ 0.80 were deemed to be hemodynamically significant.
A total of 34 patients (age: 67.3 ± 6.6 years, 7 women [20.6 %]) were included. Excellent inter-scanner agreement was noted for CT-FFR values in the per-vessel (ICC: 0.93 [0.90-0.95]) and per-patient (ICC: 0.94 [0.88-0.97]) analysis. PCD-CT-derived CT-FFR values proved to be higher compared to EID-CT values on both vessel (0.58 ± 0.23 vs. 0.55 ± 0.23, p < 0.001) and patient levels (0.73 ± 0.23 vs. 0.70 ± 0.22, p < 0.001). Two patients (5.9 %) with hemodynamically significant lesions on EID-CT were reclassified as non-significant on PCD-CT. All remaining participants were classified into the same category with both scanner systems.
While UHR CT-FFR values demonstrate excellent agreement with EID-CT measurements, PCD-CT produces higher CT-FFR values that could contribute to a reclassification of hemodynamic significance.
评估在超高分辨率(UHR)光子计数探测器(PCD)CT系列上进行CT血管造影衍生的血流储备分数(CT-FFR)计算的可行性,并在个体内将结果与能量积分(EID)CT测量结果进行比较。
招募2023年4月1日至2024年1月31日期间在EID-CT上检测到钙化斑块的前瞻性患者,在30天内进行PCD-CT上的UHR CCTA。使用相同或更低的CT剂量指数和等量的造影剂进行PCD-CT检查。使用现场机器学习算法在每个血管和每个患者的基础上获得CT-FFR值。对于所有分析,CT-FFR值≤0.80被认为具有血流动力学意义。
共纳入34例患者(年龄:67.3±6.6岁,7名女性[20.6%])。在每个血管(ICC:0.93[0.90-0.95])和每个患者(ICC:0.94[0.88-0.97])分析中,CT-FFR值显示出极好的扫描仪间一致性。在血管水平(0.58±0.23对0.55±0.23,p<0.001)和患者水平(0.73±0.23对0.70±0.22,p<0.001)上,PCD-CT衍生的CT-FFR值均高于EID-CT值。两名在EID-CT上具有血流动力学意义病变的患者(5.9%)在PCD-CT上被重新分类为无意义。所有其余参与者在两个扫描仪系统中被分类为同一类别。
虽然UHR CT-FFR值与EID-CT测量结果显示出极好的一致性,但PCD-CT产生的CT-FFR值更高,这可能有助于对血流动力学意义进行重新分类。