Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Faculty of Forest Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, 90183, Sweden.
Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Faculty of Forest Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, 90183, Sweden.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Dec 10;955:176934. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176934. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
Animals may fall into an 'ecological trap' when they select seemingly attractive habitats at the expense of their fitness. This maladaptive behavior is often the result of rapid, human-induced changes in their natal environment, such as the construction of energy and transportation infrastructure. We tested the ecological trap hypothesis regarding human-created linear infrastructure on a widely distributed apex predator and scavenger-the Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), whose range spans the entire Northern Hemisphere. Roads and railways offer novel and attractive feeding opportunities through traffic-induced mortality of other species, while powerline areas provide perching or nesting sites and scavenging opportunities from electrocuted or collision-killed birds. These conditions may have negative demographic consequences for eagles if these apparent opportunities turn into traps. Using step selection functions, we analyzed habitat selection of 74 GPS-tracked Golden Eagles (37 adults and 37 immatures) during eleven years in Fennoscandia. To assess habitat attractiveness, we used wildlife traffic accident statistics for dominant wild species, and to evaluate demographic consequences, we used mortality data from the GPS-tagged eagles. Our analysis revealed that eagles selected linear features such as roads, railways and powerlines at both the population and individual levels. Both adult and immature eagles consistently selected these features, and the strength of selection for linear features increased with age in immature eagles. The linear features however had 5.5 times higher mortality risk for eagles than other selected habitats indicating the presence of an ecological trap. We discuss the implications of these findings for the conservation and population ecology of apex predators and scavengers, as well as their potential demographic consequences. To mitigate this issue, we urgently recommend the removal of carcasses from roads and tracks to prevent ecological traps for raptors and scavenger species worldwide. Additionally, we advocate for the development of methods and strategies to reduce wildlife traffic accidents.
动物在选择看似有吸引力的栖息地时可能会陷入“生态陷阱”,从而牺牲自身适应性。这种适应不良的行为通常是由于其出生地环境的快速、人为变化引起的,例如能源和交通基础设施的建设。我们通过测试人类创造的线性基础设施对分布广泛的顶级掠食者和清道夫——金鹰(Aquila chrysaetos)的生态陷阱假说,检验了这一假说。金鹰的分布范围横跨整个北半球。道路和铁路通过其他物种因交通而死亡提供了新颖且有吸引力的觅食机会,而输电线区域则提供了停歇或筑巢地点,以及因电击或碰撞而死亡的鸟类的清道夫机会。如果这些明显的机会变成陷阱,这些条件可能会对金鹰的种群产生负面影响。我们使用步长选择函数,分析了 74 只 GPS 追踪的金鹰(37 只成年和 37 只未成年)在十一年间在 Fennoscandia 的栖息地选择。为了评估栖息地吸引力,我们使用了主要野生物种的野生动物交通事故统计数据,为了评估人口统计学后果,我们使用了 GPS 标记的金鹰的死亡率数据。我们的分析表明,金鹰在种群和个体层面上选择了道路、铁路和输电线等线性特征。成年和未成年金鹰都一致地选择了这些特征,并且未成年金鹰的线性特征选择强度随着年龄的增长而增加。然而,线性特征对金鹰的死亡率风险比其他选择的栖息地高出 5.5 倍,这表明存在生态陷阱。我们讨论了这些发现对顶级掠食者和清道夫的保护和种群生态学的影响,以及它们可能产生的人口统计学后果。为了解决这个问题,我们紧急建议从道路和轨道上清除尸体,以防止全球猛禽和清道夫物种陷入生态陷阱。此外,我们倡导开发方法和策略,以减少野生动物交通事故。