Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad, Prayagraj, 211004, India.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Nov;31(54):62853-62876. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-35248-9. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
The study's objective is to evaluate and compare the sustainability of power production techniques for India's transition to clean power generation. It specifically focuses on coal-based power generation with emission control technologies, flue gas desulfurization (FGD) with carbon capture and storage (CCS), and compares it with solar photovoltaic (PV) systems. The study conducted a life cycle assessment (LCA) to determine the environmental impact of electricity generation in each scenario. Inventory data has been collected for each case through plant visits, emission modelling, and literature searches. The study evaluated midpoint and endpoint impact indicators utilizing the ReCiPe (H) assessment methodology. The economic viability of all the cases was determined by calculating the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). The results showed that retrofitting an existing power plant with flue gas desulfurization (FGD) and carbon capture and storage (CCS) reduced efficiency by 30%, required 1.2 times more auxiliary power, and increased heat rates. The LCA results showed that the global warming potential (GwP) for FGD and CCS together was 0.614 kg CO eq. per kWh of power generation. On the other hand, the GwP for the solar PV system was much lower, at 0.043 kg CO eq. per kWh. There were trade-offs in both cases, but solar PV plants are more environmentally friendly than thermal power plants equipped with CCS systems in almost all categories. Furthermore, the LCOE results showed Rs 3.87 per kWh for an on-grid solar PV plant and Rs 5.33 for thermal power, with CCS and FGD showing solar as an economically more feasible option. Retrofitting thermal power facilities with emission control technology is necessary to achieve net zero emissions, but transition to renewable energy sources is inevitable.
本研究旨在评估和比较印度向清洁能源发电过渡过程中各种发电技术的可持续性。研究特别关注基于煤炭的发电技术,并结合排放控制技术、烟气脱硫(FGD)与碳捕集和封存(CCS),同时将其与太阳能光伏(PV)系统进行比较。本研究通过生命周期评估(LCA)来确定每种情景下发电的环境影响。通过工厂访问、排放建模和文献检索收集了每个案例的清单数据。本研究利用 ReCiPe(H)评估方法评估了中点和终点影响指标。通过计算平准化发电成本(LCOE)来确定所有案例的经济可行性。研究结果表明,在现有电厂中 retrofit 烟气脱硫(FGD)和碳捕集和封存(CCS)会降低 30%的效率,需要 1.2 倍以上的辅助功率,并增加热耗率。LCA 结果表明,FGD 和 CCS 共同的全球变暖潜势(GwP)为 0.614 kg CO eq. /kWh。另一方面,太阳能光伏系统的 GwP 要低得多,为 0.043 kg CO eq. /kWh。这两种情况都存在权衡,但在几乎所有类别中,太阳能光伏工厂比配备 CCS 系统的火力发电厂更加环保。此外,LCOE 结果表明,上网太阳能光伏电站的每千瓦时成本为 3.87 卢比,而配备 CCS 和 FGD 的火力发电为每千瓦时 5.33 卢比,表明太阳能在经济上是更可行的选择。为了实现净零排放,有必要对火力发电设施进行 retrofit 排放控制技术,但向可再生能源的过渡是不可避免的。