Lucchi Patrizia, Nasuti Alice Dina, Franciosi Giovanni, Gaeta Carlo, Grandini Simone, Ludovichetti Francesco Saverio, Mazzoleni Sergio, Malvicini Giulia
Department of Neurosciences-Dentistry Section, Padova University, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Unit of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Children (Basel). 2024 Sep 25;11(10):1166. doi: 10.3390/children11101166.
The prevalence of dental caries presents a global public challenge, particularly in children. Traditional caries risk assessment tools like Cariogram are effective but often complex and resource intensive. The aim of the present study was to introduce, for the first time, a newly designed caries risk assessment (CRA) tool named Index of Caries Risk (ICR) and to evaluate its efficacy for pediatric patients. This observational study was conducted at the University Hospital of Siena (Italy), involving 55 children aged 6 to 12 years. Participants were assessed using both the newly developed ICR and the well-known Cariogram tool. The data were collected by two calibrated operators. The ICR was compared with the Cariogram tool, and a descriptive analysis and a Pearson correlation coefficient were performed. Results indicated a strong positive correlation (R = 0.88, < 0.01) between the two methods, with ICR simplifying the assessment process while maintaining efficacy. This study highlights the ICR's potential to provide a practical, cost-effective alternative for routine caries risk assessment in pediatric dentistry. Despite its limitations, this research marks a preliminary investigation of a promising new CRA tool. Further research should focus on validating the ICR in the larger and more diverse pediatric population, as well as exploring its long-term effectiveness and its application in different clinical settings.
龋齿的患病率是一个全球性的公共挑战,尤其是在儿童中。像龋病预测模型(Cariogram)这样的传统龋齿风险评估工具是有效的,但通常很复杂且资源密集。本研究的目的是首次引入一种新设计的龋齿风险评估(CRA)工具,即龋齿风险指数(ICR),并评估其对儿科患者的有效性。这项观察性研究在意大利锡耶纳大学医院进行,涉及55名6至12岁的儿童。使用新开发的ICR和著名的龋病预测模型工具对参与者进行评估。数据由两名经过校准的操作人员收集。将ICR与龋病预测模型工具进行比较,并进行描述性分析和Pearson相关系数分析。结果表明两种方法之间存在强正相关(R = 0.88,<0.01),ICR在保持有效性的同时简化了评估过程。本研究强调了ICR在儿科牙科常规龋齿风险评估中提供实用、经济高效替代方法的潜力。尽管存在局限性,但这项研究标志着对一种有前景的新CRA工具的初步调查。进一步的研究应侧重于在更大、更多样化的儿科人群中验证ICR,以及探索其长期有效性及其在不同临床环境中的应用。