Patton Susana R, Pierce Jessica S, Kahhan Nicole, Benson Matthew, Clements Mark A, Fox Larry A
Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health, Jacksonville, FL 32207, USA.
Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health, Orlando, FL 32827, USA.
Children (Basel). 2024 Sep 26;11(10):1169. doi: 10.3390/children11101169.
This paper reports on the initial outcomes of a new mHealth intervention to reduce diabetes distress (DD) in families of school-age children living with type 1 diabetes (T1D) entitled, 'Remedy to Diabetes Distress' (R2D2).
We randomized 34 families (mean child age = 10 ± 1.4 years; 53% male, 85% White, mean HbA1c = 7.24 ± 0.71%) to one of three delivery arms differing only by number of telehealth visits over a 10-week period: zero visits = self-guided (SG), three visits = enhanced self-guided (ESG), or eight visits = video visits (VV). All families had 24 × 7 access to digital treatment materials for 10 weeks. We examined the feasibility and acceptability of R2D2. We used the Problem Areas in Diabetes-Child (PPAIDC and PAIDC, parent and child, respectively) to examine treatment effects by time and delivery arm. We performed sensitivity analyses to characterize families who responded to R2D2.
It was feasible for families to access R2D2 mHealth content independently, though attendance at telehealth visits was variable. Parents and children reported high satisfaction scores. There were significant pre-post reductions in PPAIDC ( = 0.026) and PAIDC ( = 0.026) scores but no differences by delivery arm. There were no differences in child age, sex, race, or pre-treatment HbA1c for responders versus non-responders, though families who responded reported higher PPAID-C scores pre-treatment ( = 0.01) and tended to report shorter diabetes duration ( = 0.08).
Initial results support the acceptability and treatment effects of R2D2 regardless of the frequency of adjunctive virtual visits. Characterizing responders may help to identify families who could benefit from R2D2 in the future.
本文报告了一项新的移动健康干预措施的初步成果,该措施旨在减轻1型糖尿病(T1D)学龄儿童家庭中的糖尿病困扰(DD),名为“糖尿病困扰的补救措施”(R2D2)。
我们将34个家庭(儿童平均年龄 = 10 ± 1.4岁;53%为男性,85%为白人,平均糖化血红蛋白 = 7.24 ± 0.71%)随机分为三个实施组之一,这三个组仅在为期10周的远程医疗就诊次数上有所不同:零次就诊 = 自我引导组(SG),三次就诊 = 强化自我引导组(ESG),或八次就诊 = 视频就诊组(VV)。所有家庭在10周内均可随时获取数字治疗材料。我们研究了R2D2的可行性和可接受性。我们使用糖尿病儿童问题领域量表(分别为PPAIDC和PAIDC,用于家长和儿童)来按时间和实施组检查治疗效果。我们进行了敏感性分析,以描述对R2D2有反应的家庭特征。
家庭独立获取R2D2移动健康内容是可行的,尽管远程医疗就诊的参与情况各不相同。家长和儿童报告的满意度得分较高。PPAIDC(P = 0.026)和PAIDC(P = 0.026)得分在治疗前后有显著降低,但各实施组之间无差异。反应者与无反应者在儿童年龄、性别、种族或治疗前糖化血红蛋白方面无差异,不过有反应的家庭在治疗前报告的PPAID - C得分较高(P = 0.01),且糖尿病病程往往较短(P = 0.08)。
初步结果支持R2D2的可接受性和治疗效果,无论辅助虚拟就诊的频率如何。描述反应者特征可能有助于识别未来可能从R2D2中受益的家庭。