Emanuel Hina, Yadav Aravind, Eapan Julie C, Caldas-Vasquez Maria, Harris Tomika S, McBeth Katrina, Boricha Fatima, John Janice, Magana Ceballos Ivan G, Colasurdo Giuseppe N, Tellez Maria E, Reddy Tina, De Jesús-Rojas Wilfredo, Mosquera Ricardo A
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Department of Pediatrics and Basic Sciences, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce, PR 00716, USA.
Children (Basel). 2024 Sep 26;11(10):1171. doi: 10.3390/children11101171.
In-home palivizumab administration programs (PH) have shown promise in reducing RSV-associated infections. These programs may be particularly beneficial for children with medical complexity (CMC) by limiting their exposure to healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) from non-RSV-related pathogens during transportation and visits to medical facilities.
In this prospective study, 41 children with CMC less than 2 years of age were randomized by their health insurance to receive PH or in the clinic (PC) during the RSV season (October 2018-April 2019). Patients were stratified by home ventilation. The primary outcome was the total number of face-to-face encounters. Secondary outcomes were unscheduled clinic visits and hospitalizations secondary to the non-RSV LRTIs. Standard frequentist and Bayesian analyses were performed.
All demographic factors and strata were matched between PH ("" = 13, mean age 22 mo. SD ± 1), and PC ("" = 28, mean age: 18 mo. SD ± 1). There was a decrease in the number of total face-to-face encounters (adjusted for mechanical ventilation and baseline diagnosis) [(4.5 vs. 8.8), (RR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.3-2.5, = 0.001)], and hospitalizations [(0.3 vs. 1.25), (RR: 3.8, 95% CI: 1.3-11.3, = 0.016)], in the PH vs PC groups. Bayesian analysis showed a 93% probability of benefit in favor of fewer face-to-face encounters in the PH group.
This study suggests that PH administration may reduce healthcare utilization in CMC. Minimizing exposure to healthcare facilities and supporting home-based interventions are promising strategies for this population.
家庭内使用帕利珠单抗给药方案(PH)在减少呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)相关感染方面已显示出前景。这些方案对于患有复杂疾病的儿童(CMC)可能特别有益,因为在运输过程中和前往医疗机构就诊期间,可限制他们接触非RSV相关病原体引起的医疗保健相关感染(HAI)。
在这项前瞻性研究中,41名2岁以下的CMC儿童根据其健康保险情况在RSV季节(2018年10月至2019年4月)被随机分配接受PH或门诊给药(PC)。患者按家庭通气情况分层。主要结局是面对面接触的总数。次要结局是非RSV下呼吸道感染(LRTI)继发的非计划门诊就诊和住院情况。进行了标准的频率论和贝叶斯分析。
PH组(n = 1十三,平均年龄22个月,标准差±1)和PC组(n = 28,平均年龄:18个月,标准差±1)之间所有人口统计学因素和分层均匹配。PH组与PC组相比,面对面接触总数减少(根据机械通气和基线诊断进行调整)[(4.5对8.8),(相对危险度:1.8,95%可信区间:1.3 - 2.5,P = 0.001)],住院情况也减少[(0.3对1.25),(相对危险度:3.8,95%可信区间:1.3 - 11.3,P = 0.016)]。贝叶斯分析显示PH组减少面对面接触有益的概率为93%。
本研究表明,PH给药可能会降低CMC患者的医疗保健利用率。尽量减少接触医疗保健机构并支持家庭干预对这一人群是有前景的策略。