Gu Xuan, Wu Di, Zhang Zilin, Peng Guo, Ni Anru, Wang Bo, Xiong Xiufan, Liu Yujie, Wang Li
Department of Social Work, School of Philosophy and Social Development, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.
Center for Animal Protection Studies, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.
Animals (Basel). 2024 Aug 7;14(16):2301. doi: 10.3390/ani14162301.
Managing community cats in urban China is a contentious and emerging issue, with debates centering on the most effective and humane approaches. This study aimed to investigate public attitudes towards community cats and various management strategies. A survey was conducted involving 5382 urban residents in China. Their attitudes towards the positive and negative roles of community cats in urban areas and their support for different management methods were examined, including trap-and-kill, taking no action, centralized management, and trap-neuter-return (TNR) and its variations. Results indicated that 63% of participants were willing to coexist with community cats, 71% opposed trap-and-kill, and 61% agreed or strongly agreed with the TNR method and its variations. Older residents or those with higher incomes were more likely to support coexistence with community cats. In contrast, younger or lower-income residents were more likely to support non-coexistence. Residents in first- or second-tier cities (e.g., Beijing, Hangzhou, and Jinan Cities in China) were more inclined to support trap-and-kill and less likely to support coexistence than their counterparts in fourth-tier cities (e.g., county-level cities in China). Moreover, those with lower education or incomes were more supportive of trap-and-kill and taking no action as the methods to manage community cats than those with relatively higher education or incomes. Those with higher incomes held more positive attitudes towards community cats and were more supportive of TNR and its variations than their counterparts with lower incomes. Males were more inclined to support trap-and-kill and taking no action and less inclined to support centralized management and TNR than females. The implications of the findings on TNR with adoption programs in urban China are discussed. These novel findings underscore the need for targeted educational campaigns to promote humane and effective management strategies, addressing public concerns and community cats' welfare. The study's insights are critical for informing policy and improving community cat management in urban China.
在中国城市中管理流浪猫是一个有争议的新问题,争论集中在最有效和人道的方法上。本研究旨在调查公众对流浪猫及各种管理策略的态度。在中国对5382名城市居民进行了一项调查。研究了他们对流浪猫在城市地区的积极和消极作用的态度,以及他们对不同管理方法的支持情况,包括捕杀、不采取行动、集中管理、诱捕绝育放归(TNR)及其变体。结果表明,63%的参与者愿意与流浪猫共存,71%的人反对捕杀,61%的人同意或强烈同意TNR方法及其变体。年龄较大或收入较高的居民更有可能支持与流浪猫共存。相比之下,年轻或低收入居民更有可能支持不共存。一线或二线城市(如中国的北京、杭州和济南)的居民比四线城市(如中国的县级市)的居民更倾向于支持捕杀,而支持共存的可能性更小。此外,与受教育程度或收入相对较高的人相比,受教育程度或收入较低的人更支持将捕杀和不采取行动作为管理流浪猫的方法。收入较高的人对流浪猫持更积极的态度,比收入较低的人更支持TNR及其变体。男性比女性更倾向于支持捕杀和不采取行动,而不太倾向于支持集中管理和TNR。讨论了这些研究结果对中国城市TNR领养计划的影响。这些新发现强调了开展有针对性的教育活动以推广人道和有效管理策略、解决公众关切和流浪猫福利问题的必要性。该研究的见解对于为中国城市的政策提供信息和改善流浪猫管理至关重要。