• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Postoperative Opioid Administration and Prescription Practices Following Hysterectomy in Two Tertiary Care Centres: A Comparative Cohort Study between Canada and Austria.两家三级医疗中心子宫切除术后阿片类药物的使用与处方实践:加拿大与奥地利的一项比较队列研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 10;13(20):6031. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206031.
2
Laparoscopic administration of bupivacaine at the uterosacral ligaments during benign laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜下在子宫骶韧带注射布比卡因用于良性腹腔镜和机器人辅助子宫切除术:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Nov;229(5):526.e1-526.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.07.047. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
3
Evaluation of Opioid Prescribing Patterns and Use Following Hysterectomy for Benign Indication: A Prospective Cohort Study.良性指征子宫切除术后阿片类药物处方模式及使用情况评估:一项前瞻性队列研究
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2022 Mar;44(3):240-246.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.09.019. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
4
Appendectomy Pain Medication Prescribing Variation in the U.S. Military Health System.美国军事医疗体系中阑尾切除术疼痛药物处方的差异。
Mil Med. 2024 Jul 3;189(7-8):1497-1504. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad419.
5
Predictors of new persistent opioid use after benign hysterectomy in the United States.美国良性子宫切除术后新发持续性阿片类药物使用的预测因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;227(1):68.e1-68.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.02.030. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
6
Trends in patient procurement of postoperative opioids and route of hysterectomy in the United States from 2004 through 2014.2004 年至 2014 年美国患者术后阿片类药物获取情况和子宫切除术途径的趋势。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):484.e1-484.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
7
Ultrarestrictive Opioid Prescription Protocol for Pain Management After Gynecologic and Abdominal Surgery.妇科和腹部手术后疼痛管理的超限制阿片类药物处方方案。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185452. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5452.
8
Variation by default: cesarean section discharge opioid prescription patterns and outcomes in Military Health System hospitals: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study.默认情况下的变化:军事医疗系统医院剖宫产出院阿片类药物处方模式和结果:一项回顾性纵向队列研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jul 12;22(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01765-8.
9
Opioid use after laparoscopic hysterectomy: prescriptions, patient use, and a predictive calculator.腹腔镜子宫切除术后阿片类药物的使用:处方、患者使用和预测计算器。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):259.e1-259.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.022. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
10
Risk-factors for continuous long-term use of prescription opioid drugs 3 years after hysterectomy: A nationwide cohort study.子宫切除术后 3 年内持续长期使用处方类阿片类药物的风险因素:一项全国性队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Aug;99(8):1057-1063. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13826. Epub 2020 Mar 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after surgical discharge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.术后使用阿片类药物与不使用阿片类药物镇痛:随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2022 Jun 18;399(10343):2280-2293. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00582-7.
2
Predictors of Persistent Postsurgical Pain After Hysterectomy-A Prospective Cohort Study.子宫切除术后持续性手术后疼痛的预测因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Dec;28(12):2036-2046.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.05.017. Epub 2021 May 30.
3
Is Europe Facing an Emerging Opioid Crisis Comparable to the U.S.?欧洲是否面临与美国类似的新兴阿片类药物危机?
Ther Drug Monit. 2021 Feb 1;43(1):42-51. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000789.
4
The opioid crisis in North America: facts and future lessons for Europe.北美阿片类药物危机:对欧洲的事实和未来教训。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2020;52(2):139-147. doi: 10.5114/ait.2020.94756.
5
Risk-factors for continuous long-term use of prescription opioid drugs 3 years after hysterectomy: A nationwide cohort study.子宫切除术后 3 年内持续长期使用处方类阿片类药物的风险因素:一项全国性队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Aug;99(8):1057-1063. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13826. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
6
Satisfaction with Health Care Among Prescription Opioid Recipients.处方类阿片类药物使用者对医疗保健的满意度。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Jan-Feb;33(1):34-41. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.01.190090.
7
Persistent Opioid Use After Hysterectomy in the United States, 2005-2015.美国 2005-2015 年子宫切除术后持续使用阿片类药物情况。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan;135(1):123-132. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003612.
8
Are we facing an opioid crisis in Europe?我们欧洲正面临阿片类药物危机吗?
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Oct;4(10):e483-e484. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30156-2. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
9
Patient Factors Associated With Opioid Consumption in the Month Following Major Surgery.术后一个月内与阿片类药物消耗相关的患者因素。
Ann Surg. 2021 Mar 1;273(3):507-515. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003509.
10
Trends and Patterns of Geographic Variation in Opioid Prescribing Practices by State, United States, 2006-2017.2006-2017 年美国各州阿片类药物处方实践的地域差异趋势和模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190665. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0665.

两家三级医疗中心子宫切除术后阿片类药物的使用与处方实践:加拿大与奥地利的一项比较队列研究

Postoperative Opioid Administration and Prescription Practices Following Hysterectomy in Two Tertiary Care Centres: A Comparative Cohort Study between Canada and Austria.

作者信息

Schiefer Judith, Marschalek Julian, Djuric Djurdjica, Benlolo Samantha, Shore Eliane M, Lefebvre Guylaine, Kuessel Lorenz, Worda Christof, Husslein Heinrich

机构信息

Medical University of Vienna, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Medical University of Vienna, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 10;13(20):6031. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206031.

DOI:10.3390/jcm13206031
PMID:39457981
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11508650/
Abstract

In light of the opioid epidemic, opioid-prescribing modalities for postoperative pain management have been discussed controversially and show a wide variation across geographic regions. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative pain treatment regimes. We performed a matched cohort study of women undergoing hysterectomy in Austria ( = 200) and Canada ( = 200). We aimed to compare perioperative opioid medications, converted to morphine equivalent dose (MED) and doses of non-opioid analgesic (NOA) within the first 24 h after hysterectomy, and opioid prescriptions at discharge between the two cohorts. The total MED received intraoperatively, in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and during the first 24 h after surgery, was similar in both cohorts (145.59 vs. 137.87; = 0.17). Women in the Austrian cohort received a higher MED intraoperatively compared to the Canadian cohort (117.24 vs. 79.62; < 0.001) but a lower MED in the PACU (25.96 vs. 30.42; = 0.04). The primary outcome, MED within 24 h in the postoperative ward, was markedly lower in the Austrian compared to the Canadian cohort (2.36 vs. 27.98; < 0.001). In a regression analysis, only the variables "Country" and "mode of hysterectomy" affected this outcome. A total of 98.5% in the Canadian cohort were given an opioid prescription at discharge vs. 0% in the Austrian cohort. Our analysis reveals marked differences between Austria and Canada regarding pain management practices following elective hysterectomy; the significantly higher intraoperative and significantly lower postoperative MED administration in the Austrian cohort compared to the Canadian cohort seems to be significantly affected by each country's cultural attitudes towards pain management; this may have significant public health consequences and warrants further research.

摘要

鉴于阿片类药物泛滥问题,术后疼痛管理的阿片类药物处方方式一直存在争议,且在不同地理区域差异很大。本研究的目的是比较术后疼痛治疗方案。我们对奥地利(n = 200)和加拿大(n = 200)接受子宫切除术的女性进行了一项匹配队列研究。我们旨在比较围手术期阿片类药物(换算为吗啡当量剂量[MED])以及子宫切除术后24小时内非阿片类镇痛药(NOA)的剂量,以及两个队列出院时的阿片类药物处方情况。两个队列术中、麻醉后护理单元(PACU)以及术后24小时内接受的MED总量相似(145.59 vs. 137.87;P = 0.17)。与加拿大队列相比,奥地利队列的女性术中接受的MED更高(117.24 vs. 79.62;P < 0.001),但在PACU中接受的MED更低(25.96 vs. 30.42;P = 0.04)。主要结局指标,即术后病房24小时内的MED,奥地利队列明显低于加拿大队列(2.36 vs. 27.98;P < 0.001)。在回归分析中,只有“国家”和“子宫切除方式”这两个变量影响该结局。加拿大队列中共有98.5%的患者出院时开具了阿片类药物处方,而奥地利队列这一比例为0%。我们的分析揭示了奥地利和加拿大在择期子宫切除术后疼痛管理实践方面存在显著差异;与加拿大队列相比,奥地利队列术中MED给药显著更高而术后显著更低,这似乎受到每个国家对疼痛管理的文化态度的显著影响;这可能产生重大的公共卫生后果,值得进一步研究。