Lazzari Grazia, Montagna Antonietta, D'Andrea Barbara, Bianculli Antonella, Calice Giovanni, Tucciariello Raffaele, Castaldo Giovanni, Metallo Vito, De Marco Giuseppina, Benevento Ilaria
Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Research Institute of Basilicata-IRCCS-CROB, 85028 Rionero in Vulture, PZ, Italy.
Medical Physics Department-IRCCS-CROB, 85028 Rionero in Vulture, PZ, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 19;13(20):6251. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206251.
To date, in breast cancer (BC) treatment, adjuvant chemotherapy (A-CT) has preceded adjuvant radiotherapy (A-RT). In the last twenty years, the adjuvant treatment of BC has quickly evolved due to better knowledge of its molecular biology, genetic profile, and α/β ratio of 3/4 Gy for tumor and normal tissue radiosensitivity. Thus, new schedules with hypofractionated radiotherapy have been tested, and a third generation of A-CT has been introduced, raising the question of whether it is time to rethink the sequencing between these two approaches. In the last 20 years, many attempts have been made worldwide to optimize the best sequencing strategy between these two approaches in terms of sequential CT-RT and RT-CT and concomitant and sandwich modalities using drugs and schedules. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the state of the art, analyzing all the available studies to assess the sequencing between A-CT and A-RT with different generations of chemotherapy schedules. More than 8000 patients from 30 studies treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and whole breast radiotherapy who were enrolled in randomized, retrospective, and prospective studies were analyzed. Sequential, concomitant, and sandwich modalities of chemotherapy with conventional or hypofractionated RT schedules from the most important studies were included. The most used sequence was adjuvant chemotherapy followed by conventional or hypofractionated radiotherapy. In the concomitant approach, i.v. CMF has been the most important adopted schedule, while the concomitant use of anthracyclines and taxanes with conventional or hypofractionated radiotherapy has been found to be more toxic. One study analyzed the benefit in terms of reducing adjuvant treatment time with upfront hypofractionated radiotherapy and third-generation chemotherapy. At present, the best sequencing strategy has not yet been defined. This comprehensive review is a journey among the most important randomized, retrospective, and prospective studies that highlights the past, current, and novel time sequencing proposals between A-CT and A-RT to assess the state of the art and provide useful information for future adjuvant approaches in breast cancer treatment.
迄今为止,在乳腺癌(BC)治疗中,辅助化疗(A-CT)先于辅助放疗(A-RT)。在过去二十年中,由于对乳腺癌分子生物学、基因谱以及肿瘤和正常组织放射敏感性的α/β比值(3/4 Gy)有了更深入的了解,乳腺癌的辅助治疗迅速发展。因此,已对超分割放疗的新方案进行了测试,并引入了第三代A-CT,这引发了是否到了重新思考这两种治疗方法先后顺序的问题。在过去20年里,全球范围内进行了许多尝试,以优化这两种治疗方法之间的最佳先后顺序策略,包括序贯CT-RT和RT-CT以及使用药物和方案的同步和夹心模式。本文对现有技术水平进行了全面综述,分析了所有可用研究,以评估不同代化疗方案下A-CT和A-RT之间的先后顺序。分析了30项研究中8000多名接受辅助化疗和全乳放疗的患者,这些患者纳入了随机、回顾性和前瞻性研究。纳入了最重要研究中采用常规或超分割放疗方案的化疗序贯、同步和夹心模式。最常用的顺序是辅助化疗后进行常规或超分割放疗。在同步治疗方法中,静脉注射CMF一直是最重要的采用方案,而发现蒽环类药物和紫杉烷与常规或超分割放疗同步使用毒性更大。一项研究分析了 upfront 超分割放疗和第三代化疗在缩短辅助治疗时间方面的益处。目前,最佳先后顺序策略尚未确定。这一全面综述是对最重要的随机、回顾性和前瞻性研究的一次梳理,突出了A-CT和A-RT之间过去、当前和新的时间先后顺序建议,以评估现有技术水平,并为未来乳腺癌治疗的辅助方法提供有用信息。