• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期乳腺癌患者诊断至治疗间隔对死亡率的影响:一项韩国全国性回顾性队列研究。

Impact of diagnosis-to-treatment interval on mortality in patients with early-stage breast cancer: a retrospective nationwide Korean cohort.

作者信息

Jeong Sung Hoon, Chun Seong Min, Lee Hyunji, Kim Miji, Leigh Ja-Ho

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Inje University, 50834, Gimhae, Republic of Korea.

National Traffic Injury Rehabilitation Research Institute, National Traffic Injury Rehabilitation Hospital, 12564, Yangpyeong, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMC Womens Health. 2025 May 22;25(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03780-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12905-025-03780-6
PMID:40405168
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12096538/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis-to-first-treatment interval (DFTI) is an important prognostic factor and a major concern for patients with breast cancer as well as their clinicians. It may be particularly important for patients with early-stage breast cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between DFTI and risk of mortality in patients with new-onset early-stage breast cancer.

METHODS

This nationwide, retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Korean National Health Insurance database and the Korea National Cancer Incidence Database (2006-2017). By using 1:5 propensity score matching, 3,625 participants with a DFTI < 60 days and 725 with a DFTI ≥ 60 days were included in the analysis. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to examine the association between the DFTI and 5-year all-cause mortality risk.

RESULTS

Compared with patients with breast cancer with a DFTI < 60 days, patients with a DFTI ≥ 60 days had a higher 5-year mortality risk (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 2.09 [1.43-3.06]). Similarly, sensitivity analysis with a 45-day threshold revealed higher mortality in patients with a DFTI ≥ 45 days (HR [95% CI], 1.49 [1.14-1.96]) than their counterparts with a DFTI < 45 days. This association was greater for patients with low household income, those who lived in rural areas, and those with a high Charlson comorbidity index.

CONCLUSIONS

A DFTI ≥ 60 days was associated with mortality risk in patients with early-stage breast cancer. These results emphasize the importance of closely monitoring the waiting times of this patients population and ensuring timely treatment.

摘要

背景

诊断至首次治疗间隔时间(DFTI)是一个重要的预后因素,也是乳腺癌患者及其临床医生主要关注的问题。对于早期乳腺癌患者而言,它可能尤为重要。本研究旨在探讨新发早期乳腺癌患者的DFTI与死亡风险之间的关联。

方法

这项全国性的回顾性队列研究利用了韩国国民健康保险数据库和韩国国家癌症发病率数据库(2006 - 2017年)中的数据。通过1:5倾向评分匹配,分析纳入了3625名DFTI<60天的参与者和725名DFTI≥60天的参与者。采用Cox比例风险回归模型来检验DFTI与5年全因死亡风险之间的关联。

结果

与DFTI<60天的乳腺癌患者相比,DFTI≥60天的患者5年死亡风险更高(风险比[95%置信区间],2.09[1.43 - 3.06])。同样,以45天为阈值的敏感性分析显示,DFTI≥45天的患者死亡率高于DFTI<45天的患者(HR[95%CI],1.49[1.14 - 1.96])。这种关联在家庭收入低、居住在农村地区以及Charlson合并症指数高的患者中更为明显。

结论

DFTI≥60天与早期乳腺癌患者的死亡风险相关。这些结果强调了密切监测该患者群体等待时间并确保及时治疗的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1ac/12096538/0b901028e1d1/12905_2025_3780_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1ac/12096538/d0a59311fb23/12905_2025_3780_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1ac/12096538/0b901028e1d1/12905_2025_3780_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1ac/12096538/d0a59311fb23/12905_2025_3780_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1ac/12096538/0b901028e1d1/12905_2025_3780_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of diagnosis-to-treatment interval on mortality in patients with early-stage breast cancer: a retrospective nationwide Korean cohort.早期乳腺癌患者诊断至治疗间隔对死亡率的影响:一项韩国全国性回顾性队列研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2025 May 22;25(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03780-6.
2
Association of treatment delay and stage with mortality in breast cancer: a nationwide cohort study in Taiwan.治疗延迟和分期与乳腺癌死亡率的关系:台湾全国队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 7;12(1):18915. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23683-y.
3
Association between chemotherapy and the risk of developing breast cancer-related lymphedema: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.化疗与患乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿风险之间的关联:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Feb 3;33(2):143. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09169-3.
4
Association of Adjuvant Hormone Therapy Timing With Overall Survival Among Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2-Negative Early Breast Cancer Without Chemotherapy.辅助激素治疗时机与未经化疗的激素受体阳性人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性早期乳腺癌患者总生存的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2145934. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.45934.
5
Time to Treatment: Measuring Quality Breast Cancer Care.治疗时间:衡量乳腺癌优质护理的指标
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3392-402. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5486-7. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
6
Relationship between insurance status and outcomes for patients with breast cancer in Missouri.密苏里州乳腺癌患者的保险状况与预后之间的关系。
Cancer. 2021 Mar 15;127(6):931-937. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33330. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
7
[Association between socioeconomic status and all-cause mortality after breast cancer surgery: nationwide retrospective cohort study].[乳腺癌手术后社会经济地位与全因死亡率之间的关联:全国性回顾性队列研究]
J Prev Med Public Health. 2010 Jul;43(4):330-40. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2010.43.4.330.
8
Breast cancer treatment modalities, treatment delays, and survival in Brunei Darussalam.文莱达鲁萨兰国的乳腺癌治疗方式、治疗延误及生存率
BMC Cancer. 2025 Mar 20;25(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13861-2.
9
Socioeconomic and Racial Disparities in Cancer Stage at Diagnosis, Tumor Size, and Clinical Outcomes in a Large Cohort of Women with Breast Cancer, 2007-2016.2007-2016 年大型乳腺癌女性队列中诊断时的癌症分期、肿瘤大小和临床结局的社会经济和种族差异。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2021 Aug;8(4):990-1001. doi: 10.1007/s40615-020-00855-y. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
10
EFFECT OF AGE AT DIAGNOSIS ON THE PROGNOSES IN FEMALE BREAST CANCER PATIENTS IN GEORGIA.诊断年龄对佐治亚州女性乳腺癌患者预后的影响。
Georgian Med News. 2018 Nov(284):27-32.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast Cancer Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Sequencing: Sequential, Concomitant, or What Else? A Comprehensive Review of the Adjuvant Combinations Journey.乳腺癌辅助放疗与化疗的顺序安排:序贯、同步,还是其他方式?辅助联合治疗历程的全面综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 19;13(20):6251. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206251.
2
Waiting Time for Breast Cancer Treatment in Korea: A Nationwide Cohort Study.韩国乳腺癌治疗的等待时间:一项全国性队列研究。
J Breast Cancer. 2023 Aug;26(4):334-343. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e26. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
3
Time interval between breast cancer diagnosis and surgery is associated with disease outcome.
乳腺癌诊断与手术之间的时间间隔与疾病结局相关。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 26;13(1):12091. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39259-3.
4
The Korea National Disability Registration System.韩国国家残疾登记系统。
Epidemiol Health. 2023;45:e2023053. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2023053. Epub 2023 May 11.
5
Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2020.韩国癌症统计数据:2020 年发病率、死亡率、生存率和患病率。
Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Apr;55(2):385-399. doi: 10.4143/crt.2023.447.
6
Immortal-time bias in older vs younger age groups: a simulation study with application to a population-based cohort of patients with colon cancer.老年与年轻年龄组之间的不朽时间偏倚:一项基于人群的结肠癌患者队列的模拟研究。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Apr;128(8):1521-1528. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02187-0. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
7
Time to surgery and survival in breast cancer.乳腺癌的手术时间与生存时间。
BMC Surg. 2022 Nov 11;22(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01835-1.
8
Association of treatment delay and stage with mortality in breast cancer: a nationwide cohort study in Taiwan.治疗延迟和分期与乳腺癌死亡率的关系:台湾全国队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 7;12(1):18915. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23683-y.
9
Psychological distress of cancer patients caused by treatment delay during the COVID-19 pandemic in China: A cross-sectional study.中国新冠肺炎疫情期间治疗延迟导致的癌症患者心理困扰:一项横断面研究。
Psychooncology. 2022 Sep;31(9):1607-1615. doi: 10.1002/pon.5946. Epub 2022 May 10.
10
Cancer-Specific Survival Outcome in Early-Stage Young Breast Cancer: Evidence From the SEER Database Analysis.早期年轻乳腺癌的癌症特异性生存结果:来自 SEER 数据库分析的证据。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 18;12:811878. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.811878. eCollection 2021.