Christensen Johan Frederik Mebus Meyer, Jürgens-Lahnstein Jonathan Hugo, Iljazi Afrim, Andersen Stig Ejdrup, Dahl Morten, Jürgens Gesche
Research Unit for Clinical Psychopharmacology, Mental Health Service West, Copenhagen University Hospital-Psychiatry West Region Zealand, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Oct 16;17(10):1373. doi: 10.3390/ph17101373.
QT prolongation is a potential serious adverse drug reaction, and assessing the risk of QT-prolonging drugs is routinely included in psychotropic medication reviews. However, the actual clinical benefits of such assessments are unknown. We investigate whether QT prolongation (QTc value > 480 ms) manifests in psychiatric inpatients at risk of QT prolongation as identified by assessing drug regimens. Secondly, we test the predictive value of well-known risk factors for QT prolongation.
The median patient age was 49 years (IQR 34-64) for patients treated with a median of nine drugs (IQR 6-12) and a median QT-prolonging drug sum of three daily defined dosages (IQR 1.88-4.76). We extracted 290 ECGs for patients where pharmacist-led-medication reviews (PMRs) identified an increased risk of QT prolongation and 190 ECGs for patients with no such risk, identifying 33 cases of verified QT prolongation equally distributed between groups. Unadjusted regression analysis revealed that advanced age (OR 3.27 CI 95% 1.60-6.84) and cardiovascular comorbidity (OR 3.53 CI 95% 1.71-7.29) were associated with manifest QT prolongation, while the QT-prolonging drug load was not.
We reviewed electronic health records (EHRs) of 799 psychiatric inpatients exposed to PMRs made from 1 September 2016 to 31 December 2018 in Region Zealand Denmark.
Patients at risk of QT prolongation as identified by drug reviews rarely manifests with actual QT prolongation. Non-pharmacological risk factors seem to be better predictors for identifying patients with QT prolongation.
QT间期延长是一种潜在的严重药物不良反应,在精神药物评估中常规包括对QT间期延长药物风险的评估。然而,此类评估的实际临床益处尚不清楚。我们调查通过评估用药方案确定有QT间期延长风险的精神科住院患者是否会出现QT间期延长(QTc值>480毫秒)。其次,我们测试已知QT间期延长风险因素的预测价值。
接受治疗的患者中位年龄为49岁(四分位间距34 - 64岁),中位用药数量为9种(四分位间距6 - 12种),每日规定剂量的QT间期延长药物总和中位值为3种(四分位间距1.88 - 4.76种)。我们为药剂师主导的药物评估(PMR)确定有QT间期延长风险增加的患者提取了290份心电图,为无此类风险的患者提取了190份心电图,确定33例经证实的QT间期延长病例在两组中分布均匀。未校正的回归分析显示,高龄(比值比3.27,95%置信区间1.60 - 6.84)和心血管合并症(比值比3.53,95%置信区间1.71 - 7.29)与明显的QT间期延长相关,而QT间期延长药物负荷则不然。
我们回顾了2016年9月1日至2018年12月31日在丹麦西兰岛地区接受PMR的799例精神科住院患者的电子健康记录(EHR)。
通过药物评估确定有QT间期延长风险的患者很少出现实际的QT间期延长。非药物风险因素似乎是识别QT间期延长患者的更好预测指标。