Yu Qian, Shi Chunzhou, Yang Ling, Lu Hao, Zhang Meng, Zou Xu, Wu Mei, Hou Bin, Gao Wenze, Wu Sheng, Ma Xiaohua, Hao Yue
State Key Discipline Laboratory of Wide Band-Gap Semiconductor Technology, School of Microelectronics, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China.
ZTE Corporation, Shenzhen 518057, China.
Micromachines (Basel). 2024 Sep 30;15(10):1220. doi: 10.3390/mi15101220.
In order to improve the off-state and breakdown characteristics of double-channel GaN HEMTs, an ultra-thin barrier layer was chosen as the second barrier layer. The strongly polarized and ultra-thin AlN sub-barrier and the InAlN sub-barrier are great candidates. In this article, the two epitaxial structures, AlGaN/GaN/AlN/GaN (sub-AlN) HEMTs and AlGaN/GaN/InAlN/GaN (sub-InAlN) HEMTs, were compared to select a more suitable sub-barrier layer. Through TEM images of the InAlN barrier layer, the segregation of In components can be seen, which decreases the mobility of the second channel. Thus, the sub-AlN HEMTs have a higher output current density and transconductance than those of the sub-InAlN HEMTs. Because the high-quality AlN barrier layer shields the gate leakage current, a 294 V breakdown voltage was achieved by the sub-AlN HEMTs, which is higher than the 121 V of the sub-InAlN HEMTs. The current gain cut-off frequency () and maximum oscillation frequency () of the sub-AlN HEMTs are higher than that of the sub-InAlN HEMTs from low to high bias voltage. The power-added efficiency (PAE) and output power density () of the sub-AlN HEMTs are 57% and 11.3 W/mm at 3.6 GHz and 50 V of drain voltage (), respectively. For the sub-InAlN HEMTs, the PAE and are 41.4% and 8.69 W/mm, because of the worse drain lag ratio. Thus, the of the sub-AlN HEMTs is higher than that of the sub-InAlN HEMTs.
为了改善双通道氮化镓高电子迁移率晶体管(GaN HEMTs)的关态和击穿特性,选择了超薄势垒层作为第二势垒层。强极化的超薄氮化铝(AlN)子势垒层和铟铝氮(InAlN)子势垒层是很好的选择。在本文中,对AlGaN/GaN/AlN/GaN(亚AlN)HEMTs和AlGaN/GaN/InAlN/GaN(亚InAlN)HEMTs这两种外延结构进行了比较,以选择更合适的子势垒层。通过InAlN势垒层的透射电子显微镜(TEM)图像,可以看到In组分的偏析,这降低了第二沟道的迁移率。因此,亚AlN HEMTs比亚InAlN HEMTs具有更高的输出电流密度和跨导。由于高质量的AlN势垒层能够屏蔽栅极漏电流,亚AlN HEMTs实现了294 V的击穿电压,高于亚InAlN HEMTs的121 V。从低到高偏置电压,亚AlN HEMTs的电流增益截止频率()和最大振荡频率()都高于亚InAlN HEMTs。在漏极电压()为3.6 GHz和50 V时,亚AlN HEMTs的功率附加效率(PAE)和输出功率密度()分别为57%和11.3 W/mm。对于亚InAlN HEMTs,由于漏极滞后比更差,PAE和分别为41.4%和8.69 W/mm。因此,亚AlN HEMTs的高于亚InAlN HEMTs。