Suppr超能文献

姑息治疗患者的麻醉术前访谈:基于标准化患者的模拟实验。

Anesthesiological Preoperative Interview with a Palliative Care Patient: A Simulation-Based Experiment Using Standardized Patients.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.

Department of Anesthesiology, Klinik Kitzinger Land, 97318 Kitzingen, Germany.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Sep 26;60(10):1577. doi: 10.3390/medicina60101577.

Abstract

: Anesthesiologists come into contact with patients under palliative care in different clinical settings. They also routinely encounter these patients in their primary field of work, the operating room. Patients receiving palliative care who are scheduled for surgery will pose unique challenges in perioperative management, often presenting with advanced disease and with different psychosocial and ethical issues. This study aims to evaluate whether anesthesiologists without specialty training in palliative medicine will spot perioperative challenges presented by patients under palliative care and address them adequately. In this study, we simulated a preoperative anesthesiological interview using standardized patients and anesthesiologists (specialists as well as trainees). The standardized patients were asked to represent a patient under palliative care in need of surgery because of a mechanical ileus. We conducted 32 interviews, dividing the anesthesiologists into two groups. In one group, the standardized patients were instructed to address four problems, i.e., use of a port catheter for anesthesia, nausea and vomiting, pain medication, and an advance directive including a limitation of treatment (DNR-order). In the other group, these problems were also present, but were not actively addressed by the standardized patients if not asked for. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and then analyzed. In most cases, the medical problems were spontaneously identified and discussed. In only a few cases, however, was a therapy recommendation made for improved symptom control. The advance directive was spontaneously discussed by only 3 of the 32 (9%) anesthesiologists. In another 16 cases, the advance directive was discussed at the request of the standardized patients. The limitation of treatment stayed in place in all cases, and the discussion of the advance directives remained short, with an average duration of just over 5 min. In this study, the complex problems of patients under palliative care are not sufficiently taken into account in a preoperative anesthesiological interview. To improve treatment of the medical problems, therapists who have palliative medicine expertise, should be involved in the perioperative medical care, ideally as a multi-professional team. The discussion about perioperative limitations of treatment should be held beforehand, for example, as part of a structured advanced care planning discussion.

摘要

麻醉师在不同的临床环境中接触到接受姑息治疗的患者。他们也经常在手术室等主要工作领域遇到这些患者。接受姑息治疗并计划接受手术的患者在围手术期管理中会带来独特的挑战,他们通常患有晚期疾病,并存在不同的社会心理和伦理问题。本研究旨在评估没有姑息医学专业培训的麻醉师是否能够发现姑息治疗患者在围手术期面临的挑战,并充分解决这些问题。在这项研究中,我们使用标准化患者和麻醉师(专家和受训者)模拟了术前麻醉咨询。要求标准化患者代表因机械性肠梗阻而需要手术的姑息治疗患者。我们进行了 32 次访谈,将麻醉师分为两组。在一组中,标准化患者被指示解决四个问题,即麻醉用端口导管的使用、恶心和呕吐、疼痛药物和包括治疗限制(DNR 指令)的预先指示。在另一组中,如果没有主动提出,这些问题也存在,但不会由标准化患者主动解决。访谈被录音、转录,然后进行分析。在大多数情况下,医疗问题会自动被识别并讨论。然而,只有在少数情况下,才会提出改善症状控制的治疗建议。只有 32 名麻醉师中的 3 名(9%)会自动讨论预先指示。在另外 16 例中,预先指示是在标准化患者的要求下进行讨论的。在所有情况下,治疗限制都保持不变,预先指示的讨论时间很短,平均持续时间略多于 5 分钟。在这项研究中,术前麻醉咨询中没有充分考虑到姑息治疗患者的复杂问题。为了改善对医疗问题的治疗,应让具有姑息医学专业知识的治疗师参与围手术期医疗护理,理想情况下是以多专业团队的形式参与。应事先进行围手术期治疗限制的讨论,例如,作为结构化的高级护理计划讨论的一部分。

相似文献

6
Perioperative Advance Directives: Do Not Resuscitate in the Operating Room.围手术期预立医嘱:在手术室不进行心肺复苏。
Surg Clin North Am. 2019 Oct;99(5):859-865. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jul 20.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验