Tian Aiqin, Sun Kang, Che Quanwei, Jiang Beichen, Song Xiangang, Guo Lirong, Chen Dongdong, Xiao Shoune
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.
CRRC Qingdao Sifang Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266111, China.
Materials (Basel). 2024 Oct 11;17(20):4970. doi: 10.3390/ma17204970.
The continuous increase in the operating speed of rail vehicles demands higher requirements for passive safety protection and lightweight design. This paper focuses on an energy-absorbing component (circular tubes) at the end of a train. Thin-walled carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) tubes were prepared using the filament winding process. Through a combination of sled impact tests and finite element simulations, the effects of a chamfered trigger (Tube I) and embedded trigger (Tube II) on the impact response and crashworthiness of the structure were investigated. The results showed that both triggering methods led to the progressive end failure of the tubes. Tube I exhibited a mean crush force (MCF) of 891.89 kN and specific energy absorption (SEA) of 38.69 kJ/kg. In comparison, the MCF and SEA of Tube II decreased by 21.2% and 21.9%, respectively. The reason for this reduction is that the presence of the embedded trigger in Tube II restricts the expansion of the inner plies (plies 4 to 6), thereby affecting the overall energy absorption mechanism. Based on the validated finite element model, a modeling strategy study was conducted, including the failure parameters (DFAILT/DFAILC), the friction coefficient, and the interfacial strength. It was found that the prediction results are significantly influenced by modeling methods. Specifically, as the interfacial strength decreases, the tube wall is more prone to circumferential cracking or overall buckling under axial impact.
轨道车辆运行速度的不断提高对被动安全保护和轻量化设计提出了更高的要求。本文重点研究列车端部的一种能量吸收部件(圆管)。采用纤维缠绕工艺制备了薄壁碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)管。通过雪橇冲击试验和有限元模拟相结合的方法,研究了倒角触发(管I)和嵌入式触发(管II)对结构冲击响应和耐撞性的影响。结果表明,两种触发方式均导致了管的渐进式端部失效。管I的平均压溃力(MCF)为891.89 kN,比能量吸收(SEA)为38.69 kJ/kg。相比之下,管II的MCF和SEA分别下降了21.2%和21.9%。这种降低的原因是管II中嵌入式触发装置的存在限制了内层(第4至6层)的扩展,从而影响了整体能量吸收机制。基于验证后的有限元模型,进行了建模策略研究,包括失效参数(DFAILT/DFAILC)、摩擦系数和界面强度。结果发现,预测结果受建模方法的影响很大。具体而言,随着界面强度的降低,管壁在轴向冲击下更容易发生周向开裂或整体屈曲。