Xu Yanhui, Chen Jiyong, Guan Mingzhu, Xiao Shoune, Yang Guangwu, Chen Dongdong
Technical Center, CRRC Datong Co., Ltd., Datong 037038, China.
State Key Laboratory of Rail Transit Vehicle System, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China.
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jul 2;18(13):3133. doi: 10.3390/ma18133133.
In the context of global environmental pollution and energy shortages, the use of lightweight designs of railway vehicles has become a key technological approach to improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions. The use of lightweight and high-strength materials such as carbon-fiber-reinforced composites to replace traditional metal vehicle structures holds great application potential. In this study, random track loads and ballast impact loads that may occur during service were considered, and a finite-element model of the electric locomotive coupling protective cover was established. The impact resistance of CFRP, GFRP, and their interlayer hybrid configurations (C/G/C and G/C/G) against structural and ballast impacts were investigated. The calculation results showed that the CFRP protective cover exhibited the best structural impact resistance (with the lowest Tsai-Wu strength failure values), but it also had the largest maximum deformation displacement (2.36 mm) under ballast impact conditions. In contrast, the GFRP protective cover had a higher Tsai-Wu strength failure value, indicating that it had worse structural impact resistance, but it had a lower maximum deformation displacement (2.20 mm) under ballast impact conditions, demonstrating superior ballast impact resistance. The impact resistances of the hybrid-layered protective covers fell between those of the CFRP and GFRP in terms of the structural impact, while their ballast-impact resistance surpassed those of single-fiber configurations.
在全球环境污染和能源短缺的背景下,铁路车辆采用轻量化设计已成为提高能源效率和减少碳排放的关键技术途径。使用碳纤维增强复合材料等轻质高强度材料取代传统金属车辆结构具有巨大的应用潜力。本研究考虑了服役期间可能出现的随机轨道载荷和道砟冲击载荷,建立了电力机车联轴器防护罩的有限元模型。研究了碳纤维增强塑料(CFRP)、玻璃纤维增强塑料(GFRP)及其层间混合构型(C/G/C和G/C/G)对结构和道砟冲击的抗冲击性能。计算结果表明,CFRP防护罩具有最佳的结构抗冲击性能(蔡-吴强度失效值最低),但在道砟冲击条件下其最大变形位移也最大(2.36mm)。相比之下,GFRP防护罩的蔡-吴强度失效值较高,表明其结构抗冲击性能较差,但在道砟冲击条件下其最大变形位移较小(2.20mm),显示出优越的道砟抗冲击性能。就结构冲击而言,混合层防护罩的抗冲击性能介于CFRP和GFRP之间,而其道砟抗冲击性能超过了单纤维构型。