• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种利用多传感器漏磁信号融合的新型缺陷量化方法。

A Novel Defect Quantification Method Utilizing Multi-Sensor Magnetic Flux Leakage Signal Fusion.

作者信息

Liu Wenlong, Ren Lemei, Tian Guansan

机构信息

School of Thermal Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250100, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2024 Oct 14;24(20):6623. doi: 10.3390/s24206623.

DOI:10.3390/s24206623
PMID:39460103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11511088/
Abstract

In the assessment of pipeline integrity using magnetic flux leakage (MFL) detection, it is crucial to quantify defects accurately and efficiently using MFL signals. However, in complex detection environments, traditional defect inversion methods exhibit low quantification accuracy and efficiency due to the complexity of their algorithms or excessive reliance on a priori knowledge and expert experience. To address these issues, this study presents a novel defect quantification method based on multi-sensor signal fusion (MSSF). The method employs a multi-sensor probe to fuse the MFL signals under multiple lift-off values, enhancing the diversity of defect information. This enables defect-opening profile recognition using the characteristic approximation approach (CAA). Subsequently, the MSSF method is based on a 3D magnetic dipole model and integrates the structural features of multi-sensor probes to develop an algorithm. This algorithm iteratively determines the defect depth at multiple data acquisition points within the defect region to obtain the maximum defect depth. The feasibility of the MSSF quantification method is validated through finite element simulation and physical experiments. The results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves accurate defect quantification while enhancing efficiency, with the number of iterations for each defect depth calculation point consistently requiring fewer than 15 iterations. For rectangular metal loss, perforation, and conical defects, quantification errors are less than 10%, meeting practical inspection requirements.

摘要

在使用漏磁(MFL)检测评估管道完整性时,利用MFL信号准确高效地量化缺陷至关重要。然而,在复杂的检测环境中,传统的缺陷反演方法由于算法复杂或过度依赖先验知识和专家经验,其量化精度和效率较低。为了解决这些问题,本研究提出了一种基于多传感器信号融合(MSSF)的新型缺陷量化方法。该方法采用多传感器探头融合多个提离值下的MFL信号,增强了缺陷信息的多样性。这使得能够使用特征近似方法(CAA)识别缺陷开口轮廓。随后,MSSF方法基于三维磁偶极子模型,并整合多传感器探头的结构特征来开发一种算法。该算法在缺陷区域内的多个数据采集点迭代确定缺陷深度,以获得最大缺陷深度。通过有限元模拟和物理实验验证了MSSF量化方法的可行性。结果表明,所提出的方法在提高效率的同时实现了准确的缺陷量化,每个缺陷深度计算点的迭代次数始终少于15次。对于矩形金属损失、穿孔和锥形缺陷,量化误差小于10%,满足实际检测要求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/faa3f08de3d4/sensors-24-06623-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/d6caae048441/sensors-24-06623-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/cbd0ec8d4b16/sensors-24-06623-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/1fe4c144463e/sensors-24-06623-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/c33fd43e9686/sensors-24-06623-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/1a05435c8e7a/sensors-24-06623-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/b440ccd389a5/sensors-24-06623-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/2805f680b1fc/sensors-24-06623-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/3269d864f71b/sensors-24-06623-g008a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/ddf6d244c890/sensors-24-06623-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/25865a11e950/sensors-24-06623-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/028fca45ae42/sensors-24-06623-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/af40c02d9c9d/sensors-24-06623-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/34177cd9a535/sensors-24-06623-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/1d2cce056eb2/sensors-24-06623-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/faa3f08de3d4/sensors-24-06623-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/d6caae048441/sensors-24-06623-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/cbd0ec8d4b16/sensors-24-06623-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/1fe4c144463e/sensors-24-06623-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/c33fd43e9686/sensors-24-06623-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/1a05435c8e7a/sensors-24-06623-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/b440ccd389a5/sensors-24-06623-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/2805f680b1fc/sensors-24-06623-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/3269d864f71b/sensors-24-06623-g008a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/ddf6d244c890/sensors-24-06623-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/25865a11e950/sensors-24-06623-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/028fca45ae42/sensors-24-06623-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/af40c02d9c9d/sensors-24-06623-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/34177cd9a535/sensors-24-06623-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/1d2cce056eb2/sensors-24-06623-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/602a/11511088/faa3f08de3d4/sensors-24-06623-g015.jpg

相似文献

1
A Novel Defect Quantification Method Utilizing Multi-Sensor Magnetic Flux Leakage Signal Fusion.一种利用多传感器漏磁信号融合的新型缺陷量化方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Oct 14;24(20):6623. doi: 10.3390/s24206623.
2
Defect Width Assessment Based on the Near-Field Magnetic Flux Leakage Method.基于近场漏磁法的缺陷宽度评估
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 11;21(16):5424. doi: 10.3390/s21165424.
3
Study on the Impact of Pole Spacing on Magnetic Flux Leakage Detection under Oversaturated Magnetization.过饱和磁化下极间距对漏磁检测影响的研究
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Aug 11;24(16):5195. doi: 10.3390/s24165195.
4
Fast estimation of defect profiles from the magnetic flux leakage signal based on a multi-power affine projection algorithm.基于多幂次仿射投影算法从漏磁信号快速估计缺陷轮廓
Sensors (Basel). 2014 Sep 4;14(9):16454-66. doi: 10.3390/s140916454.
5
Magnetic Flux Leakage Sensing and Artificial Neural Network Pattern Recognition-Based Automated Damage Detection and Quantification for Wire Rope Non-Destructive Evaluation.基于磁通泄漏传感和人工神经网络模式识别的钢丝绳无损评估自动损伤检测与量化
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jan 2;18(1):109. doi: 10.3390/s18010109.
6
Evaluation of the Size of a Defect in Reinforcing Steel Using Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) Measurements.基于漏磁(MFL)测量评估钢筋缺陷的大小。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 6;23(12):5374. doi: 10.3390/s23125374.
7
Magnetic flux leakage defect size estimation method based on physics-informed neural network.基于物理信息神经网络的漏磁缺陷尺寸估计方法
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2024 Jan 8;382(2264):20220387. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2022.0387. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
8
A Review of Magnetic Flux Leakage Nondestructive Testing.漏磁通无损检测综述
Materials (Basel). 2022 Oct 20;15(20):7362. doi: 10.3390/ma15207362.
9
Mechanism of Magnetic Flux Leakage Detection Method Based on the Slotted Ferromagnetic Lift-Off Layer.基于开槽铁磁提离层的漏磁检测方法机理
Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 9;22(9):3587. doi: 10.3390/s22093587.
10
Quantitative Study on MFL Signal of Pipeline Composite Defect Based on Improved Magnetic Charge Model.基于改进磁荷模型的管道复合缺陷漏磁场信号定量研究
Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 13;21(10):3412. doi: 10.3390/s21103412.

引用本文的文献

1
Acoustic Emission-Based Pipeline Leak Detection and Size Identification Using a Customized One-Dimensional DenseNet.基于声发射的管道泄漏检测及尺寸识别:使用定制的一维密集连接网络
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Feb 12;25(4):1112. doi: 10.3390/s25041112.

本文引用的文献

1
A Review of Magnetic Flux Leakage Nondestructive Testing.漏磁通无损检测综述
Materials (Basel). 2022 Oct 20;15(20):7362. doi: 10.3390/ma15207362.
2
Defect reconstruction from magnetic flux leakage measurements employing modified cuckoo search algorithm.基于改进布谷鸟搜索算法的漏磁检测缺陷重构。
Math Biosci Eng. 2021 Feb 22;18(2):1898-1925. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021099.
3
Management and control of microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) in the oil and gas industry-Overview and a North Sea case study.石油和天然气行业中微生物影响腐蚀(MIC)的管理与控制——概述及北海案例研究。
J Biotechnol. 2017 Aug 20;256:31-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
4
Defect profile estimation from magnetic flux leakage signal via efficient managing particle swarm optimization.基于高效管理粒子群优化算法的漏磁信号缺陷轮廓估计
Sensors (Basel). 2014 Jun 12;14(6):10361-80. doi: 10.3390/s140610361.