• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于遗传算法参数调整的比例积分微分二型模糊逻辑控制器的无人机轨迹跟踪

UAV Trajectory Tracking Using Proportional-Integral-Derivative-Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Controller with Genetic Algorithm Parameter Tuning.

作者信息

Moali Oumaïma, Mezghani Dhafer, Mami Abdelkader, Oussar Abdelatif, Nemra Abdelkrim

机构信息

UR-LAPER, Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis 2092, Tunisia.

School of Control and Automation, Ecole Militaire Polytechnique, EMP, Bordj El Bahri, Algiers 16111, Algeria.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2024 Oct 17;24(20):6678. doi: 10.3390/s24206678.

DOI:10.3390/s24206678
PMID:39460158
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11511504/
Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-type Quadrotors are highly nonlinear systems that are difficult to control and stabilize outdoors, especially in a windy environment. Many algorithms have been proposed to solve the problem of trajectory tracking using UAVs. However, current control systems face significant hurdles, such as parameter uncertainties, modeling errors, and challenges in windy environments. Sensitivity to parameter variations may lead to performance degradation or instability. Modeling errors arise from simplifications, causing disparities between assumed and actual behavior. Classical controls may lack adaptability to dynamic changes, necessitating adaptive strategies. Limited robustness in handling uncertainties can result in suboptimal performance. Windy environments introduce disturbances, impacting system dynamics and precision. The complexity of wind modeling demands advanced estimation and compensation strategies. Tuning challenges may necessitate frequent adjustments, posing practical limitations. Researchers have explored advanced control paradigms, including robust, adaptive, and predictive control, aiming to enhance system performance amidst uncertainties in a scientifically rigorous manner. Our approach does not require knowledge of UAVs and noise models. Furthermore, the use of the Type-2 controller makes our approach robust in the face of uncertainties. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is clear from the obtained results. In this paper, robust and optimal controllers are proposed, validated, and compared on a quadrotor navigating an outdoor environment. First, a Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC) combined with a PID is compared to a Type-1 FLC and Backstepping controller. Second, a Genetic Algorithm (GA) is proposed to provide the optimal PID-Type-2 FLC tuning. The Backstepping, PID-Type-1 FLC, and PID-Type-2 FLC with GA optimization are validated and evaluated with real scenarios in a windy environment. Deep robustness analysis, including error modeling, parameter uncertainties, and actuator faults, is considered. The obtained results clearly show the robustness of the optimal PID-Type-2 FLC compared to the Backstepping and PID-Type-1 FLC controllers. These results are confirmed by the numerical index of each controller compared to the PID-type-2 FLC, with 12% for the Backstepping controller and 51% for the PID-Type-1 FLC.

摘要

无人机类型的四旋翼飞行器是高度非线性系统,在户外难以控制和稳定,尤其是在有风的环境中。已经提出了许多算法来解决使用无人机进行轨迹跟踪的问题。然而,当前的控制系统面临重大障碍,例如参数不确定性、建模误差以及有风环境中的挑战。对参数变化的敏感性可能导致性能下降或不稳定。建模误差源于简化,导致假设行为与实际行为之间存在差异。经典控制可能缺乏对动态变化的适应性,因此需要自适应策略。在处理不确定性方面的鲁棒性有限可能导致性能次优。有风的环境会引入干扰,影响系统动态和精度。风建模的复杂性需要先进的估计和补偿策略。调优挑战可能需要频繁调整,带来实际限制。研究人员探索了先进的控制范式,包括鲁棒、自适应和预测控制,旨在以科学严谨的方式在不确定性中提高系统性能。我们的方法不需要无人机和噪声模型的知识。此外,使用二阶控制器使我们的方法在面对不确定性时具有鲁棒性。从获得的结果可以清楚地看出所提出方法的有效性。在本文中,提出了鲁棒和最优控制器,并在导航户外环境的四旋翼飞行器上进行了验证和比较。首先,将二阶模糊逻辑控制器(FLC)与PID相结合,与一阶FLC和反步控制器进行比较。其次,提出了一种遗传算法(GA)来提供最优的PID - 二阶FLC调优。对反步、PID - 一阶FLC以及经过GA优化的PID - 二阶FLC在有风环境中的实际场景进行了验证和评估。考虑了包括误差建模、参数不确定性和执行器故障在内的深度鲁棒性分析。获得的结果清楚地表明,与反步和PID - 一阶FLC控制器相比,最优PID - 二阶FLC具有鲁棒性。与PID - 二阶FLC相比,每个控制器的数值指标证实了这些结果,反步控制器为12%,PID - 一阶FLC为51%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/bbcac9a3970d/sensors-24-06678-g041.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/71d12887aaa4/sensors-24-06678-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/36a7e683603d/sensors-24-06678-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/b31b7d9e2297/sensors-24-06678-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/89d6e28b91d5/sensors-24-06678-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/299646b1b568/sensors-24-06678-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/6b3f099e6423/sensors-24-06678-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/63ab4b94a88f/sensors-24-06678-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/757fabe9bd46/sensors-24-06678-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/80dfcd2ecddc/sensors-24-06678-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/60c54b41f63c/sensors-24-06678-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/a4ed33ab5b76/sensors-24-06678-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/2ab61a7b6bd0/sensors-24-06678-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/551e87b7f615/sensors-24-06678-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/9644705b9a14/sensors-24-06678-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/9ea1a2b84f52/sensors-24-06678-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/138181e84631/sensors-24-06678-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/f8d09d73882f/sensors-24-06678-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/c64f3d144498/sensors-24-06678-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/71b1691f09a8/sensors-24-06678-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/8b86eff8c413/sensors-24-06678-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/1ced07dad55f/sensors-24-06678-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/7f7acf5c0d38/sensors-24-06678-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/8a3db889511b/sensors-24-06678-g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/b0107aa96c08/sensors-24-06678-g024.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/aabcbd6487fa/sensors-24-06678-g025.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/139907ba73a2/sensors-24-06678-g026.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/4fde0b810d92/sensors-24-06678-g027.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/23beaa5e59b7/sensors-24-06678-g028.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/3eef57e20171/sensors-24-06678-g029.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/8b06279534a2/sensors-24-06678-g030.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/82fa2a4fe7b7/sensors-24-06678-g031.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/ff65936f81e0/sensors-24-06678-g032.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/af0a1598bf82/sensors-24-06678-g033.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/02b8ff4665d0/sensors-24-06678-g034.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/9ca785e14710/sensors-24-06678-g035.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/c33cf2c68b49/sensors-24-06678-g036.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/b5d89579eade/sensors-24-06678-g037.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/71055fac3bfe/sensors-24-06678-g038.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/b7d7da466c19/sensors-24-06678-g039.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/bbcac9a3970d/sensors-24-06678-g041.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/71d12887aaa4/sensors-24-06678-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/36a7e683603d/sensors-24-06678-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/b31b7d9e2297/sensors-24-06678-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/89d6e28b91d5/sensors-24-06678-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/299646b1b568/sensors-24-06678-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/6b3f099e6423/sensors-24-06678-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/63ab4b94a88f/sensors-24-06678-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/757fabe9bd46/sensors-24-06678-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/80dfcd2ecddc/sensors-24-06678-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/60c54b41f63c/sensors-24-06678-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/a4ed33ab5b76/sensors-24-06678-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/2ab61a7b6bd0/sensors-24-06678-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/551e87b7f615/sensors-24-06678-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/9644705b9a14/sensors-24-06678-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/9ea1a2b84f52/sensors-24-06678-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/138181e84631/sensors-24-06678-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/f8d09d73882f/sensors-24-06678-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/c64f3d144498/sensors-24-06678-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/71b1691f09a8/sensors-24-06678-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/8b86eff8c413/sensors-24-06678-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/1ced07dad55f/sensors-24-06678-g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/7f7acf5c0d38/sensors-24-06678-g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/8a3db889511b/sensors-24-06678-g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/b0107aa96c08/sensors-24-06678-g024.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/aabcbd6487fa/sensors-24-06678-g025.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/139907ba73a2/sensors-24-06678-g026.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/4fde0b810d92/sensors-24-06678-g027.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/23beaa5e59b7/sensors-24-06678-g028.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/3eef57e20171/sensors-24-06678-g029.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/8b06279534a2/sensors-24-06678-g030.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/82fa2a4fe7b7/sensors-24-06678-g031.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/ff65936f81e0/sensors-24-06678-g032.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/af0a1598bf82/sensors-24-06678-g033.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/02b8ff4665d0/sensors-24-06678-g034.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/9ca785e14710/sensors-24-06678-g035.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/c33cf2c68b49/sensors-24-06678-g036.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/b5d89579eade/sensors-24-06678-g037.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/71055fac3bfe/sensors-24-06678-g038.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/b7d7da466c19/sensors-24-06678-g039.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a355/11511504/bbcac9a3970d/sensors-24-06678-g041.jpg

相似文献

1
UAV Trajectory Tracking Using Proportional-Integral-Derivative-Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Controller with Genetic Algorithm Parameter Tuning.基于遗传算法参数调整的比例积分微分二型模糊逻辑控制器的无人机轨迹跟踪
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Oct 17;24(20):6678. doi: 10.3390/s24206678.
2
Fault tolerant control for modified quadrotor via adaptive type-2 fuzzy backstepping subject to actuator faults.基于自适应型 2 模糊反推的故障容错控制在执行器故障下的改进四旋翼飞行器
ISA Trans. 2019 Dec;95:330-345. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2019.04.034. Epub 2019 May 14.
3
Design of interval type-2 fuzzy precompensated PID controller applied to two-DOF robotic manipulator with variable payload.应用于具有可变负载的两自由度机器人操纵器的区间二型模糊预补偿PID控制器设计
ISA Trans. 2019 Jun;89:169-185. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2018.12.030. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
4
Robust PID control of quadrotors with power reduction analysis.基于功率降低分析的四旋翼飞行器鲁棒PID控制
ISA Trans. 2020 Mar;98:47-62. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2019.08.045. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
5
Performance evaluation of PSO-PID and PSO-FLC for continuum robot's developed modeling and control.用于连续体机器人的已开发建模与控制的粒子群优化-比例积分微分(PSO-PID)和粒子群优化-模糊逻辑控制器(PSO-FLC)的性能评估
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 6;14(1):733. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50551-0.
6
Novel Fuzzy PID-Type Iterative Learning Control for Quadrotor UAV.四旋翼无人机的新型模糊 PID 型迭代学习控制。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Dec 21;19(1):24. doi: 10.3390/s19010024.
7
An optimal interval type-2 fuzzy logic control based closed-loop drug administration to regulate the mean arterial blood pressure.基于最优区间型 2 模糊逻辑控制的闭环给药调节平均动脉血压。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Mar;185:105167. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105167. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
8
Coot optimization algorithm-tuned neural network-enhanced PID controllers for robust trajectory tracking of three-link rigid robot manipulator.用于三连杆刚性机器人机械手鲁棒轨迹跟踪的布谷鸟优化算法调整的神经网络增强型PID控制器。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 17;10(13):e32661. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32661. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
9
Fuzzy Gain-Scheduling PID for UAV Position and Altitude Controllers.用于无人机位置和高度控制器的模糊增益调度PID
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 10;22(6):2173. doi: 10.3390/s22062173.
10
Performance Analysis of Fuzzy-PID Controller for Blood Glucose Regulation in Type-1 Diabetic Patients.1型糖尿病患者血糖调节的模糊PID控制器性能分析
J Med Syst. 2016 Dec;40(12):254. doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0602-6. Epub 2016 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Application and Optimisation of a Neural Network PID Controller for Trajectory Tracking Using UAVs.基于无人机的神经网络PID控制器在轨迹跟踪中的应用与优化
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Dec 18;24(24):8072. doi: 10.3390/s24248072.

本文引用的文献

1
Fuzzy Gain-Scheduling PID for UAV Position and Altitude Controllers.用于无人机位置和高度控制器的模糊增益调度PID
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Mar 10;22(6):2173. doi: 10.3390/s22062173.
2
Adaptive Robust Trajectory Tracking Control of Multiple Quad-Rotor UAVs with Parametric Uncertainties and Disturbances.具有参数不确定性和干扰的多四旋翼无人机自适应鲁棒轨迹跟踪控制
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 31;21(7):2401. doi: 10.3390/s21072401.
3
An Improved Genetic Algorithm for Path-Planning of Unmanned Surface Vehicle.一种用于无人水面舰艇路径规划的改进遗传算法。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jun 11;19(11):2640. doi: 10.3390/s19112640.
4
Novel Fuzzy PID-Type Iterative Learning Control for Quadrotor UAV.四旋翼无人机的新型模糊 PID 型迭代学习控制。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Dec 21;19(1):24. doi: 10.3390/s19010024.
5
Composite learning from adaptive backstepping neural network control.基于自适应反步神经网络控制的组合学习。
Neural Netw. 2017 Nov;95:134-142. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Sep 22.