Área de Genética y Reproducción Animal, SERIDA-Deva, Gijón, Asturias, Spain.
Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae329.
Contributions to gene diversity and allelic richness were computed in a total of 2,260 domestic pig genotypes, sharing 53,626 autosomal SNPs, belonging to 98 pig subpopulations worldwide (41 Asian, 696 genotypes; 20 American, 262 genotypes; and 37 European, 686 genotypes), using 616 pig samples belonging to 5 different Cosmopolitan pig breeds as an outgroup, to ascertain if local pig subpopulation can be considered reservoirs of genetic diversity for the whole domestic pig species worldwide. Assessments were carried out for the whole dataset and separately for the American-European and Asian subsets. Effective population size was computed at the subpopulation level using molecular coancestry and linkage disequilibrium information to ensure that estimates of contributions to diversity were not affected by demographic issues. Most American and European pig subpopulations tended to have favorable contributions to both gene diversity and allelic richness. However, contributions to allelic richness were more consistent than those obtained for gene diversity, whether the computations are performed using either the whole dataset or the American-Asian subset, suggesting that allelic richness can be a key parameter to identify putative reservoirs for the species. The Asian pig subpopulations never contributed favorably to the allelic richness of the domestic pig metapopulation. Although these results can partially be explained by the highly divergent origins of the American-European and the Asian pig subpopulations, it cannot be discarded that the results obtained for the Asian subpopulations are biased due to a worse calling performance of the pig SNP arrays used for genotyping. The use of other potentially less biased sources of genotypic information is advisable to compare the Asian and American-European pig subpopulations genetic diversity.
共计算了 2260 个家猪基因型的基因多样性和等位基因丰富度,这些基因型共享 53626 个常染色体 SNPs,来自全球 98 个猪亚群(41 个亚洲,696 个基因型;20 个美洲,262 个基因型;37 个欧洲,686 个基因型),使用 616 个属于 5 个不同世界品种的猪样本作为外群,以确定当地猪亚群是否可以被视为全球家猪物种遗传多样性的储备库。评估是针对整个数据集以及美洲-欧洲和亚洲子集分别进行的。使用分子亲缘关系和连锁不平衡信息在亚群水平上计算有效种群规模,以确保多样性贡献的估计不受人口统计问题的影响。大多数美洲和欧洲猪亚群往往对基因多样性和等位基因丰富度都有有利的贡献。然而,无论是使用整个数据集还是美洲-亚洲子集进行计算,等位基因丰富度的贡献都比基因多样性的贡献更为一致,这表明等位基因丰富度可以成为识别物种潜在储备库的关键参数。亚洲猪亚群从未对家猪复合种群的等位基因丰富度做出有利贡献。尽管这些结果可以部分解释为美洲-欧洲和亚洲猪亚群起源的高度分化,但不能排除由于用于基因分型的猪 SNP 芯片的调用性能较差,导致获得的亚洲亚群结果存在偏差。建议使用其他潜在的偏差较小的基因型信息来源,以比较亚洲和美洲-欧洲猪亚群的遗传多样性。