Suppr超能文献

门诊心脏导管插入术在医院及独立机构环境中的疗效。

The efficacy of ambulatory cardiac catheterization in the hospital and free-standing setting.

作者信息

Kahn K L

出版信息

Am Heart J. 1986 Jan;111(1):152-67. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(86)90567-3.

Abstract

The optimal site for performing cardiac catheterization depends upon complications of the procedure, access to care in the event of complications, costs, quality of the catheterization studies, access to the procedure, and patient satisfaction. Performing ambulatory cardiac catheterization at or adjacent to a hospital may assume equivalent access to emergent or urgent services, equivalent quality, and improved patient satisfaction at reduced cost for low-risk patients (stable coronary symptoms, no active congestive heart failure, no significant arrhythmias, and no significant comorbid factor--bleeding diathesis, renal insufficiency, uncontrolled systolic hypertension). However, moving an outpatient catheterization from the hospital site to a free-standing unit, physically remote from a hospital, may be associated with a reduction in access to emergency care and less standardized quality assurance.

摘要

进行心导管插入术的最佳部位取决于该操作的并发症、出现并发症时获得治疗的途径、成本、心导管插入术研究的质量、进行该操作的途径以及患者满意度。对于低风险患者(稳定的冠状动脉症状、无活动性充血性心力衰竭、无显著心律失常且无显著合并症因素——出血性素质、肾功能不全、未控制的收缩期高血压),在医院或其附近进行动态心导管插入术可能意味着能同等地获得紧急或急诊服务、同等质量且能以降低的成本提高患者满意度。然而,将门诊心导管插入术从医院地点转移到远离医院的独立单元,可能会导致获得紧急护理的途径减少且质量保证的标准化程度降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验