Asquini Giacomo, Devecchi Valter, Viscuso Domenico, Bucci Rosaria, Michelotti Ambra, Liew Bernard X W, Falla Deborah
Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Italian Stomatologic Institute, Craniomandibular Physiotherapy Service, Via Pace 21, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
J Pain. 2025 Jan;26:104721. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104721. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are a common musculoskeletal condition, presenting treatment challenges due to their non-specific nature. Categorizing patients with TMDs into clusters based on neurobiological pain mechanisms could provide a promising approach to facilitate targeted treatments. This observational study (1) used a network analysis (NA) to explore the complexity of TMDs by investigating relationships among biopsychosocial variables, and (2) validated potential TMD subgroups based on mechanism-specific pain categories. One hundred and two patients with TMD were included. Biopsychosocial variables covered: general health, psychosocial features, TMD pain, and TMD characteristics. A NA evaluated the associations between variables and determined the role of each feature within the network. Hierarchical clustering was used to identify TMD subgroups. The NA revealed significant correlations primarily within the same feature domains, indicating a strong interplay between symptoms and psychological factors. Cluster analysis identified two subgroups driven by nociceptive and nociplastic pain mechanisms; the nociplastic group exhibited higher levels of anxiety, depression, pain catastrophization, central sensitization, pain duration, and more pain locations, along with poorer sleep quality, quality of life, and health status. In contrast, the nociceptive group exhibited restricted maximal mouth opening (MMO), heightened pain during TMJ palpation and mouth opening, and a greater positive response to manual therapy. Across all features, psychological factors, pain locations, and MMO primarily contributed to the separation of subgroups. By adopting a data-driven approach, these results support the significant role of considering the neurobiological basis of pain to improve patient classification. This knowledge may facilitate clinical reasoning and personalized treatments. PERSPECTIVE: This study used a network analysis to explore the complex biopsychosocial interactions present in people with TMDs, identifying important variables such as the Central Sensitization Inventory and pain-free maximal mouth opening. The findings distinguish potential nociceptive and nociplastic pain subgroups, offering important insights for targeted therapeutic strategies.
颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMDs)是一种常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,因其非特异性的性质而带来治疗挑战。根据神经生物学疼痛机制将TMD患者分类为不同群组,可能为促进针对性治疗提供一种有前景的方法。这项观察性研究:(1)使用网络分析(NA),通过调查生物心理社会变量之间的关系来探索TMDs的复杂性,以及(2)基于特定机制的疼痛类别验证潜在的TMD亚组。纳入了102例TMD患者。生物心理社会变量涵盖:一般健康状况、心理社会特征、TMD疼痛和TMD特征。NA评估了变量之间的关联,并确定了每个特征在网络中的作用。采用层次聚类来识别TMD亚组。NA揭示主要在相同特征域内存在显著相关性,表明症状与心理因素之间存在强烈的相互作用。聚类分析确定了由伤害性和神经可塑性疼痛机制驱动的两个亚组;神经可塑性亚组表现出更高水平的焦虑、抑郁、疼痛灾难化、中枢敏化、疼痛持续时间和更多的疼痛部位,以及更差的睡眠质量、生活质量和健康状况。相比之下,伤害性亚组表现出最大张口受限(MMO)、颞下颌关节触诊和张口时疼痛加剧,以及对手法治疗有更大的阳性反应。在所有特征中,心理因素、疼痛部位和MMO主要促成了亚组的分离。通过采用数据驱动的方法,这些结果支持了考虑疼痛的神经生物学基础以改善患者分类的重要作用。这些知识可能有助于临床推理和个性化治疗。观点:本研究使用网络分析来探索TMD患者中存在的复杂生物心理社会相互作用,识别了诸如中枢敏化量表和无痛最大张口等重要变量。研究结果区分了潜在的伤害性和神经可塑性疼痛亚组,为针对性治疗策略提供了重要见解。