Suppr超能文献

饥饿应对经济权衡与慈善食品援助女性接受者食物不安全之间的关联。

The association between hunger-coping economic tradeoffs and food insecurity among female recipients of charitable food assistance.

机构信息

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Cizik School of Nursing, USA.

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Cizik School of Nursing, USA.

出版信息

Appetite. 2025 Jan 1;204:107733. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107733. Epub 2024 Oct 24.

Abstract

Food insecurity is an indicator of well-being in the United States. A high proportion of recipients of charitable food assistance (CFA) are women and are often in charge of specific household managerial responsibilities (e.g., childcare, transportation). Consequently, they frequently face choices between paying for food and paying for other basic need(s). This study aims to examine which hunger-coping economic tradeoffs place females with at least one dependent child in the house and females without a dependent child in the house at risk for experiencing food insecurity. Data was collected at 10 Houston-area and 10-Atlanta-area food pantries in 2022 (N = 883). Using USDA cutoff criteria, households were considered food insecure based on ≥3 affirmative responses to the 18-item Food Security Scale Module. Hunger-coping economic tradeoff experiences were based on affirmative responses to whether anyone in the household ever had to choose between food and six basic needs (i.e. childcare, medicine/medical care, utilities, rent/mortgage, transportation, education). Covariate-adjusted logistic regression models were conducted to understand the relationship between six hunger-coping economic tradeoffs and food insecurity for the entire analytic sample and stratified by whether the female participant had a child in house. Standard errors in all regression models were corrected to account for multiple observations within a pantry. Adults, on average, were 55 years old (58% food insecure; 47% Hispanic; 42% black). Four hunger-coping economic tradeoffs were related to experiencing food insecurity. Economic tradeoffs between food and a) medicine/medical care and b) transportation elevated the likelihood of food insecurity, regardless of child status. Tradeoffs between food and childcare increased the risk for experiencing food insecurity among females with a dependent child. Deciding to pay between food and utilities was related to food insecurity experiences among females without a dependent child. Increases in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits and eligibility along with programs to enhance resources related to medical care, transportation, childcare and utilities could help reduce food insecurity, especially among CFA recipients.

摘要

食品不安全是美国幸福感的一个指标。慈善食品援助(CFA)的接受者中,很大一部分是女性,她们通常负责特定的家庭管理责任(例如,儿童保育、交通)。因此,她们经常面临着在购买食物和支付其他基本需求之间做出选择。本研究旨在探讨哪些饥饿应对的经济权衡取舍会使家中有至少一名受抚养子女的女性和家中没有受抚养子女的女性面临食品不安全的风险。本研究的数据于 2022 年在休斯顿地区的 10 家和亚特兰大地区的 10 家食品分发处收集(N=883)。根据美国农业部的截止标准,如果家庭对 18 项食品安全量表模块的问题有≥3 个肯定回答,则认为该家庭食品不安全。饥饿应对的经济权衡取舍经验是基于家庭中是否有人曾经不得不在食物和六个基本需求(即儿童保育、药品/医疗保健、水电费、租金/抵押贷款、交通、教育)之间做出选择来确定的。对整个分析样本和按女性参与者家中是否有孩子进行分层,进行了协变量调整的逻辑回归模型,以了解六个饥饿应对的经济权衡取舍与食品不安全之间的关系。在所有回归模型中,都对标准误差进行了修正,以考虑到一个食品分发处内的多次观察。成年人的平均年龄为 55 岁(58%食品不安全;47%西班牙裔;42%黑人)。有四个饥饿应对的经济权衡取舍与食品不安全有关。在食物和 a)药品/医疗保健和 b)交通之间的经济权衡取舍增加了食品不安全的可能性,无论儿童状况如何。在有受抚养子女的女性中,食物和儿童保育之间的权衡取舍增加了经历食品不安全的风险。在没有受抚养子女的女性中,决定在食物和水电费之间支付费用与食品不安全经历有关。增加补充营养援助计划(SNAP)的福利和资格以及加强与医疗保健、交通、儿童保育和水电费相关的资源的项目,可以帮助减少食品不安全,特别是在 CFA 接受者中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验