Suppr超能文献

多变量检验在进行性核上性麻痹试验中的效率。

Efficiency of multivariate tests in trials in progressive supranuclear palsy.

机构信息

Center for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 26;14(1):25581. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76668-4.

Abstract

Measuring disease progression in clinical trials for testing novel treatments for multifaceted diseases as progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), remains challenging. In this study we assess a range of statistical approaches to compare outcomes as measured by the items of the progressive supranuclear palsy rating scale (PSPRS). We consider several statistical approaches, including sum scores, a modified PSPRS rating scale that had been recommended by FDA in a pre-IND meeting, multivariate tests, and analysis approaches based on multiple comparisons of the individual items. In addition, we propose two novel approaches which measure disease status based on Item Response Theory models. We assess the performance of these tests under various scenarios in an extensive simulation study and illustrate their use with a re-analysis of the ABBV-8E12 clinical trial. Furthermore, we discuss the impact of the FDA-recommended scoring of item scores on the power of the statistical tests. We find that classical approaches as the PSPRS sum score demonstrate moderate to high power when treatment effects are consistent across the individual items. The tests based on Item Response Theory (IRT) models yield the highest power when the simulated data are generated from an IRT model. The multiple testing based approaches have a higher power in settings where the treatment effect is limited to certain domains or items. The study demonstrates that there is no one-size-fits-all testing procedure for evaluating treatment effects using PSPRS items; the optimal method varies based on the specific effect size patterns. The efficiency of the PSPRS sum score, while generally robust and straightforward to apply, varies depending on the specific patterns of effect sizes encountered and more powerful alternatives are available in specific settings. These findings can have important implications for the design of future clinical trials in PSP and similar multifaceted diseases.

摘要

在临床试验中,针对多方面疾病(如进行性核上性麻痹 (PSP))的新型治疗方法进行疾病进展的测量仍然具有挑战性。在这项研究中,我们评估了一系列统计方法,以比较由进行性核上性麻痹评定量表 (PSPRS)的项目测量的结果。我们考虑了几种统计方法,包括总分、FDA 在预 IND 会议中推荐的修改后的 PSPRS 评分量表、多变量检验,以及基于个别项目多次比较的分析方法。此外,我们还提出了两种基于项目反应理论模型测量疾病状态的新方法。我们在广泛的模拟研究中评估了这些测试在各种情况下的性能,并通过对 ABBV-8E12 临床试验的重新分析说明了它们的使用。此外,我们还讨论了 FDA 推荐的项目评分对统计测试功效的影响。我们发现,当治疗效果在各个项目中一致时,经典方法(如 PSPRS 总分)表现出中等至高的功效。当模拟数据来自项目反应理论 (IRT) 模型时,基于 IRT 模型的测试产生了最高的功效。当治疗效果仅限于某些领域或项目时,基于多次检验的方法具有更高的功效。该研究表明,使用 PSPRS 项目评估治疗效果没有一种适合所有情况的测试程序;最佳方法因特定的效果大小模式而异。PSPRS 总分虽然通常稳健且易于应用,但效率因遇到的效果大小特定模式而异,并且在特定情况下可提供更强大的替代方法。这些发现对 PSP 和类似多方面疾病的未来临床试验设计具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94c4/11514033/a04f92236c7f/41598_2024_76668_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验